Do it again: revitalizing an organization concept

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Organizational Change Management Pub Date : 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1108/jocm-03-2023-0094
Christopher Berg, J. Benders, J. A. Ingvaldsen
{"title":"Do it again: revitalizing an organization concept","authors":"Christopher Berg, J. Benders, J. A. Ingvaldsen","doi":"10.1108/jocm-03-2023-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeBy exploring the process of concept revitalization, this paper contributes to a better understanding of the intraorganizational retention of organization concepts. Concept revitalization occurs when an organization refocuses attention and resources toward a previously adopted organization concept. This paper investigates why and how organization concepts are revitalized.Design/methodology/approachThe findings are based on a case study of a Norwegian energy company's revitalization of the organization concept “lean”, whose initial implementation had been unsuccessful. The data were analyzed inductively by identifying how the concept was reframed during the second attempt and how the revitalization was justified.FindingsIn the case company, the revitalization was driven by (1) replacing the original label, (2) maintaining the original content in a slightly modified form and (3) altering the implementation mode. The changes were supported by a narrative of past shortcomings, lessons learned and a plan for future success, authored by internal experts in lean with a strong interest in ensuring positive results.Research limitations/implicationsConcept revitalization implies that there is more continuity in the application of ideas than is suggested in the literature on management fashions.Originality/valueSo far, the retention of organization concepts has only been studied at the field level. This study is the first to offer an empirically grounded understanding of intraorganizational concept revitalization.","PeriodicalId":47958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Change Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-03-2023-0094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeBy exploring the process of concept revitalization, this paper contributes to a better understanding of the intraorganizational retention of organization concepts. Concept revitalization occurs when an organization refocuses attention and resources toward a previously adopted organization concept. This paper investigates why and how organization concepts are revitalized.Design/methodology/approachThe findings are based on a case study of a Norwegian energy company's revitalization of the organization concept “lean”, whose initial implementation had been unsuccessful. The data were analyzed inductively by identifying how the concept was reframed during the second attempt and how the revitalization was justified.FindingsIn the case company, the revitalization was driven by (1) replacing the original label, (2) maintaining the original content in a slightly modified form and (3) altering the implementation mode. The changes were supported by a narrative of past shortcomings, lessons learned and a plan for future success, authored by internal experts in lean with a strong interest in ensuring positive results.Research limitations/implicationsConcept revitalization implies that there is more continuity in the application of ideas than is suggested in the literature on management fashions.Originality/valueSo far, the retention of organization concepts has only been studied at the field level. This study is the first to offer an empirically grounded understanding of intraorganizational concept revitalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
再来一次:重振组织理念
目的通过探讨组织概念更新的过程,有助于更好地理解组织概念的组织内部保留。当组织将注意力和资源重新集中到先前采用的组织概念上时,就会发生概念更新。本文探讨了组织概念复兴的原因和方式。设计/方法/方法研究结果基于对挪威一家能源公司“精益”组织概念复兴的案例研究,该公司最初的实施并不成功。通过确定在第二次尝试中如何重新定义概念以及如何证明振兴的合理性,对数据进行了归纳分析。在案例公司中,振兴的动力是:(1)更换原有的标签,(2)保持原有的内容,并在形式上稍作修改,(3)改变实施方式。这些变化得到了对过去缺点、经验教训和未来成功计划的叙述的支持,这些叙述是由内部精益专家撰写的,他们对确保积极的结果非常感兴趣。研究的局限性/意义概念复兴意味着在思想的应用中比在管理模式的文献中所建议的有更多的连续性。到目前为止,组织概念的保留只在实地层面进行了研究。本研究首次以实证为基础,对组织内概念再生进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: ■Adapting strategic planning to the need for change ■Leadership research ■Responsibility for change implementation and follow-through ■The psychology of change and its effect on the workforce ■TQM - will it work in your organization? Successful organizations respond intelligently to factors which precipitate change. Economic climates, political trends, changes in consumer demands, management policy or structure, employment levels and financial resources - all these elements are constantly at play to ensure that organizations clinging on to static structures will ultimately lose out. But change is a dynamic and alarming thing - this journal addresses how to manage it positively.
期刊最新文献
Developing and validating a scale for entrepreneurial marketing orientations: EMICO framework and its impact on business performance in startups School principals’ resistance to change: a multilevel analysis of individual factors and contextual conditions A systematic literature review on the network perspective and resource interaction: where are we now and where should we go? “I am served by a Robot!”: internal antecedents of customer acceptance of robotic hotel-service agents Unveiling organizational consciousness: a conceptual framework for nurturing thriving organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1