The Impact of Ethical and Legal Decision-Making in Neonatal Intensive Care on Psychosocial Wellbeing of the Health Care Professionals: The Overview of the HUNIC Project Study Design

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL European Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2019-12-10 DOI:10.5708/ejmh.14.2019.2.6

H. J. Feith, Zsuzsanna Soósné Kiss, János Pilling, A. Kovács, M. Szabó, M. Cuttini, I. Berbik, Gézsi András, E. Gradvohl

{"title":"The Impact of Ethical and Legal Decision-Making in Neonatal Intensive Care on Psychosocial Wellbeing of the Health Care Professionals: The Overview of the HUNIC Project Study Design","authors":"H. J. Feith, Zsuzsanna Soósné Kiss, János Pilling, A. Kovács, M. Szabó, M. Cuttini, I. Berbik, Gézsi András, E. Gradvohl","doi":"10.5708/ejmh.14.2019.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper introduces the multidisciplinary HUNIC project, which is partly based on the EURONIC study. The objective of the HUNIC study is to assess the attitude and opinion of healthcare providers in Hungarian NICUs about end-of-life decisions, the decision-making process, parental communication, to analyse the differences between HUNIC results in 2015-2016 and EURONIC results in 1996-1997, to compare the attitudes of neonatologists and neonatal nurses, and to identify factors that might affect those attitudes and opinions. A further important objective of the HUNIC study is to compare these attitudes and opinions of neonatal care providers with their personal work experience, educational background in the bioethics field, social support, work and life satisfaction, burnout, health behaviour and psychosocial health. This paper aims to present the methodology of an extensive, complex, and multidisciplinary survey (HUNIC) within the framework of the EURONIC.","PeriodicalId":42949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5708/ejmh.14.2019.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper introduces the multidisciplinary HUNIC project, which is partly based on the EURONIC study. The objective of the HUNIC study is to assess the attitude and opinion of healthcare providers in Hungarian NICUs about end-of-life decisions, the decision-making process, parental communication, to analyse the differences between HUNIC results in 2015-2016 and EURONIC results in 1996-1997, to compare the attitudes of neonatologists and neonatal nurses, and to identify factors that might affect those attitudes and opinions. A further important objective of the HUNIC study is to compare these attitudes and opinions of neonatal care providers with their personal work experience, educational background in the bioethics field, social support, work and life satisfaction, burnout, health behaviour and psychosocial health. This paper aims to present the methodology of an extensive, complex, and multidisciplinary survey (HUNIC) within the framework of the EURONIC.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

新生儿重症监护伦理和法律决策对医护人员心理社会健康的影响:HUNIC项目研究设计概述

本文介绍了多学科的HUNIC项目，该项目部分基于EURONIC研究。HUNIC研究的目的是评估匈牙利新生儿重症监护病房医疗保健提供者对临终决定、决策过程、父母沟通的态度和意见，分析2015-2016年HUNIC结果与1996-1997年EURONIC结果的差异，比较新生儿医生和新生儿护士的态度，并确定可能影响这些态度和意见的因素。HUNIC研究的另一个重要目标是将新生儿护理提供者的这些态度和意见与他们的个人工作经验、生物伦理学领域的教育背景、社会支持、工作和生活满意度、倦怠、健康行为和心理社会健康进行比较。本文旨在介绍在EURONIC框架内广泛，复杂和多学科调查(HUNIC)的方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Mental Health, an open-access, peer reviewed, interdisciplinary, professional journal concerned with mental health, personal well-being and its supporting ecosystems that acknowledge the importance of people’s interactions with their environments, established in 2006, is published on 280 pages per volume in English and German by the Semmelweis University Institute of Mental Health. The journal’s professional oversight is provided by the Editor-in-Chief and an international Editorial Board, assisted by an Advisory Board. The semiannual journal, with issues appearing in June and December, is published in Budapest. The journal aims at the dissemination of the latest scientific research on mental health and well-being in Europe. It seeks novel, integrative and comprehensive, applied as well as theoretical articles that are inspiring for professionals and practitioners with different fields of interest: social and natural sciences, humanities and different segments of mental health research and practice. The primary thematic focus of EJMH is the social-ecological antecedents of mental health and foundations of human well-being. Most specifically, the journal welcomes contributions that present high-quality, original research findings on well-being and mental health across the lifespan and in historical perspective.