Case study of different types of telemedicine diagnostic projects

T. Peng, Nan Wang, Xiao An, Tian Wei, B. Xuan, W. Feng
{"title":"Case study of different types of telemedicine diagnostic projects","authors":"T. Peng, Nan Wang, Xiao An, Tian Wei, B. Xuan, W. Feng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2020.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the similarities and differences of four telemedicine diagnostic projects, for providing evidence-based policy-making advice for the development of telemedicine diagnostic projects in China. \n \n \nMethods \nFour projects led by the government, close medical alliances, loose medical alliances and companies were selected from November 2018 to June 2019. Through semi-structured interviews with different leaders, the authors analyzed the characteristics, problems and difficulties of different projects from three dimensions of organizational system, working conditions and operational effects. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 18 people were interviewed. Projects were different from each other in leaders, connection mechanism and effectiveness, participants and timeliness as well. The projects led by the government and close medical alliances had limited local participants with strong connection, clear but limited sources of diagnostic doctors and relatively large workload. While the projects led by loose medical alliances and companies had a wide range of participants, relatively weak connection efficiency and long response time. \n \n \nConclusions \nDifferent types of telemedicine diagnostic projects have supplemented the manpower shortage of diagnosis physicians at primary medical institutions, introduced new service participants, as well as improved the medical service system. \n \n \nKey words: \nTelemedicine; Telemedicine diagnostic projects; Case study; Medical alliances","PeriodicalId":56974,"journal":{"name":"中华医院管理杂志","volume":"36 1","pages":"45-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医院管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2020.01.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the similarities and differences of four telemedicine diagnostic projects, for providing evidence-based policy-making advice for the development of telemedicine diagnostic projects in China. Methods Four projects led by the government, close medical alliances, loose medical alliances and companies were selected from November 2018 to June 2019. Through semi-structured interviews with different leaders, the authors analyzed the characteristics, problems and difficulties of different projects from three dimensions of organizational system, working conditions and operational effects. Results A total of 18 people were interviewed. Projects were different from each other in leaders, connection mechanism and effectiveness, participants and timeliness as well. The projects led by the government and close medical alliances had limited local participants with strong connection, clear but limited sources of diagnostic doctors and relatively large workload. While the projects led by loose medical alliances and companies had a wide range of participants, relatively weak connection efficiency and long response time. Conclusions Different types of telemedicine diagnostic projects have supplemented the manpower shortage of diagnosis physicians at primary medical institutions, introduced new service participants, as well as improved the medical service system. Key words: Telemedicine; Telemedicine diagnostic projects; Case study; Medical alliances
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同类型远程医疗诊断项目的案例研究
目的比较四个远程医疗诊断项目的异同,为我国远程医疗诊断的发展提供循证决策建议。方法从2018年11月至2019年6月,选取政府主导、紧密型医疗联盟、松散型医疗联盟和公司四个项目。通过对不同领导的半结构化访谈,作者从组织体系、工作条件和运作效果三个维度分析了不同项目的特点、问题和困难。结果共访谈18人。项目在领导者、连接机制和有效性、参与者和及时性方面各不相同。由政府和紧密的医疗联盟领导的项目在当地的参与者有限,他们之间有着密切的联系,诊断医生的来源明确但有限,工作量相对较大。而由松散的医疗联盟和公司领导的项目参与者广泛,连接效率相对较弱,响应时间较长。结论不同类型的远程医疗诊断项目弥补了基层医疗机构诊断医师的人力短缺,引入了新的服务参与者,完善了医疗服务体系。关键词:远程医疗;远程医疗诊断项目;案例研究;医疗联盟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9658
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Management practice for critical COVID-19 patients rescue in designated hospitals Exploration and practice: operation mode of a united medical team cooperation in designated hospitals for treating severe COVID-19 patients Pharmaceutical administration practice during prevention and treatment of COVID-19 The thinking on improving the construction of the national treatment system for major infectious diseases and the emergency response mechanism Characteristics and practice management of intensive care for patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1