Geostatistics as a tool to reduce the sampling effort in forest inventories

Myrcia Minatti, Carlos Roberto Sanquetta, Sylvio Péllico Neto, Ana Paula Dalla Corte, V. Cysneiros
{"title":"Geostatistics as a tool to reduce the sampling effort in forest inventories","authors":"Myrcia Minatti, Carlos Roberto Sanquetta, Sylvio Péllico Neto, Ana Paula Dalla Corte, V. Cysneiros","doi":"10.18188/sap.v20i2.25601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geostatistics is one of the tools applied to investigate the spatial variability of forests to reduce costs and recognize the best productivity areas for planning. This study aimed to test the performance of geostatistical techniques in reducing the sampling effort in forest inventories. For this purpose, we used the height of dominant trees as a discriminator of the homogeneous strata to obtain a better representation of the productivity within the forest stands. We carried out the study in Pinus taeda L. stands in the Center-South of Paraná, Brazil, by using plots from a forest inventory allocated with the systematic process. Then, we tested three models to determine the site curves (Schumacher, Chapman-Richards 2, and 3 coefficients) with the thirty-seventh year being the reference age. To model the spatial patterns of the dominant height, we used the ordinary kriging, and, after that, we generated the thematic maps of the site classes. Similarly, we used the indicator kriging which allowed obtaining the probabilities of high, medium, and low productivity sites. The processing of the stratified sampling, with the support of the visual interpretation of the images, allowed us to define five strata according to productivity. Results showed that ordinary kriging is effective in defining the productivity classes. Along with geostatistical techniques, it produces more homogeneous strata and reduces the errors of the forest inventory. Moreover, the best-selected model was the Chapman-Richards (3 coefficients) for the site curves. The exponential model was the best model to identify the best areas of the probability of occurrence of sites with higher productivity. The efficiency of indicative kriging generated thematic maps to delimit the likely locations of the most promising sites. Overall, geostatistics proved to be efficient concerning error when compared to simple random sampling.","PeriodicalId":30289,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Agraria Paranaensis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Agraria Paranaensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18188/sap.v20i2.25601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geostatistics is one of the tools applied to investigate the spatial variability of forests to reduce costs and recognize the best productivity areas for planning. This study aimed to test the performance of geostatistical techniques in reducing the sampling effort in forest inventories. For this purpose, we used the height of dominant trees as a discriminator of the homogeneous strata to obtain a better representation of the productivity within the forest stands. We carried out the study in Pinus taeda L. stands in the Center-South of Paraná, Brazil, by using plots from a forest inventory allocated with the systematic process. Then, we tested three models to determine the site curves (Schumacher, Chapman-Richards 2, and 3 coefficients) with the thirty-seventh year being the reference age. To model the spatial patterns of the dominant height, we used the ordinary kriging, and, after that, we generated the thematic maps of the site classes. Similarly, we used the indicator kriging which allowed obtaining the probabilities of high, medium, and low productivity sites. The processing of the stratified sampling, with the support of the visual interpretation of the images, allowed us to define five strata according to productivity. Results showed that ordinary kriging is effective in defining the productivity classes. Along with geostatistical techniques, it produces more homogeneous strata and reduces the errors of the forest inventory. Moreover, the best-selected model was the Chapman-Richards (3 coefficients) for the site curves. The exponential model was the best model to identify the best areas of the probability of occurrence of sites with higher productivity. The efficiency of indicative kriging generated thematic maps to delimit the likely locations of the most promising sites. Overall, geostatistics proved to be efficient concerning error when compared to simple random sampling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地质统计学作为减少森林清查抽样工作的工具
地质统计学是用于调查森林空间变异性的工具之一,以降低成本并确定规划的最佳生产力区域。本研究旨在检验地质统计技术在减少森林清查中抽样工作方面的性能。为此,我们使用优势树的高度作为同质层的判别因子,以便更好地代表林分内的生产力。本研究以巴西帕拉南中南部的松林为研究对象,利用系统程序分配的森林清查样地进行研究。然后,我们测试了三个模型来确定位点曲线(Schumacher, Chapman-Richards 2和3系数),以37岁为参考年龄。为了模拟主导高度的空间格局,我们使用了普通的克里格,然后,我们生成了场地类别的专题地图。同样,我们使用了克里格指标,它允许获得高、中、低生产率站点的概率。分层取样的处理,在图像视觉解释的支持下,使我们能够根据生产力定义五个层。结果表明,普通克里格法在确定生产率等级方面是有效的。与地质统计技术一起,它产生了更均匀的地层,减少了森林清查的误差。最理想的模型是场地曲线的Chapman-Richards(3个系数)模型。指数模型是确定高生产力站点出现概率的最佳区域的最佳模型。指示性克里格的效率产生了专题地图,以划定最有希望的场址的可能位置。总的来说,与简单的随机抽样相比,地质统计学证明是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spatial arrangements between rows x radish plants Intraspecific crosses and agronomic evaluation of hybrid progenies of bahiagrass Germinative potential of Ocimum basilicum L. seeds in commercial substrate and soil conditioner Fruit culture growth in Northeast Brazil and its relationship with work SÍNTESE DE PROTEÍNA MICROBIANA E BALANÇO DE NITROGÊNIO EM NOVILHAS MESTIÇAS HOLANDEZ /ZEBU ALIMENTADAS COM DUAS FONTES DE TANINOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1