Ingestion of herbal medication during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.7196/SAJOG.1615
L. Kekana, M. Sebitloane
{"title":"Ingestion of herbal medication during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes","authors":"L. Kekana, M. Sebitloane","doi":"10.7196/SAJOG.1615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Pregnant women in South Africa (SA) traditionally use herbal medicines even though the potential risk or benefit is not fully elucidated.  Objectives. To determine the prevalence of the use of herbal medicines in pregnant women in our setting, as well as explore the reasons for use.  Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted at King Edward VIII Hospital, from 1 September 2014 to 31 December 2014. Women were interviewed using a structured questionnaire during the post-delivery period, irrespective of outcome. The questionnaires enquired about women’s demographic data, social and previous obstetric history and herbal medication use during current pregnancy.  Results. Two hundred and ninety-nine women were interviewed. The prevalence of herbal medication use was 33.7% ( n =101), mainly via the oral route. Fifty-eight (57.4%) of these women used herbal medication throughout their pregnancy. Reasons given for herbal ingestion included general well-being, or to make labour easier or come sooner. There was a high rate of caesarean delivery among pregnant women who used herbal medication compared with those who did not (79.2% v. 52.8%; p =0.001). One hundred and eighteen women had meconium-stained liquor; 59% of the herbal medication users compared with 29.6% of the non-users ( p <0.001) comprised this group.The perinatal mortality rate was also higher among users ( p <0.04). There were no maternal deaths.  Conclusion. Herbal medicine was used by a third of black South African pregnant women in this study and was associated with significant adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":49579,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJOG.1615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background. Pregnant women in South Africa (SA) traditionally use herbal medicines even though the potential risk or benefit is not fully elucidated.  Objectives. To determine the prevalence of the use of herbal medicines in pregnant women in our setting, as well as explore the reasons for use.  Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted at King Edward VIII Hospital, from 1 September 2014 to 31 December 2014. Women were interviewed using a structured questionnaire during the post-delivery period, irrespective of outcome. The questionnaires enquired about women’s demographic data, social and previous obstetric history and herbal medication use during current pregnancy.  Results. Two hundred and ninety-nine women were interviewed. The prevalence of herbal medication use was 33.7% ( n =101), mainly via the oral route. Fifty-eight (57.4%) of these women used herbal medication throughout their pregnancy. Reasons given for herbal ingestion included general well-being, or to make labour easier or come sooner. There was a high rate of caesarean delivery among pregnant women who used herbal medication compared with those who did not (79.2% v. 52.8%; p =0.001). One hundred and eighteen women had meconium-stained liquor; 59% of the herbal medication users compared with 29.6% of the non-users ( p <0.001) comprised this group.The perinatal mortality rate was also higher among users ( p <0.04). There were no maternal deaths.  Conclusion. Herbal medicine was used by a third of black South African pregnant women in this study and was associated with significant adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在怀孕期间服用草药和不良的围产期结局
背景。南非(SA)的孕妇传统上使用草药,尽管潜在的风险或益处尚未完全阐明。目标。确定本地区孕妇使用草药的流行程度,并探讨使用草药的原因。方法。这项横断面研究于2014年9月1日至2014年12月31日在爱德华八世国王医院进行。无论结果如何,妇女在分娩后使用结构化问卷进行访谈。调查问卷询问了妇女的人口统计数据、社会和以前的产科史以及目前怀孕期间使用草药的情况。结果。共有299名女性接受了采访。使用草药的患病率为33.7% (n =101),主要通过口服途径。这些妇女中有58人(57.4%)在整个怀孕期间使用草药。服用草药的原因包括一般的健康,或使分娩更容易或更快。使用草药的孕妇剖宫产率高于未使用草药的孕妇(79.2% vs 52.8%;p = 0.001)。118名妇女喝了沾有粪污的酒;使用草药者占59%,而不使用草药者占29.6% (p <0.001)。服用者的围产期死亡率也较高(p <0.04)。没有产妇死亡。结论。在这项研究中,三分之一的南非黑人孕妇使用草药,这与显著的不良产科和围产期结局有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The SAJOG is a tri-annual, general specialist obstetrics and gynaecology journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. The journal carries original research articles, editorials, clinical practice, personal opinion, South Africa health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Does adding coenzyme Q10 to dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate positively impact fertility outcomes in young, poor responder infertile women undergoing antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI cycles? Prevalence and severity of depression and anxiety in infertile female patients attending an academic hospital in central South Africa Is medicine a process of scientific rigour? How to care for fetuses with prenatally diagnosed severe abnormalities Prevalence of and sociodemographic factors associated with antenatal depression among women in Limpopo Province, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1