Integrating resource oriented sanitation technologies with urban agriculture in developing countries: measuring the governance capacity of Arba Minch City, Ethiopia

IF 2.4 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Frontiers in Sustainable Cities Pub Date : 2023-08-22 DOI:10.3389/frsc.2023.1153502
Abrham Kassa Ejigu, Kumelachew Yeshitela
{"title":"Integrating resource oriented sanitation technologies with urban agriculture in developing countries: measuring the governance capacity of Arba Minch City, Ethiopia","authors":"Abrham Kassa Ejigu, Kumelachew Yeshitela","doi":"10.3389/frsc.2023.1153502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research study aims to assess the capacity of Arba Minch City to adopt resource-oriented sanitation technology and integrate it with urban agriculture. The overarching goal is to promote sustainable urban development by not only using resources efficiently but also recovering resources from urban waste streams. To measure the city's governance capacity, the study employs a Governance Capability Framework (GCF), which identifies nine conditions and three indicators for each condition across three dimensions: knowing, wanting, and enabling. The framework helps assess the city's capacity for governance throughout the integration of urban agriculture with ecological sanitation (ecosan) technology. The research employs a triangle strategy, which consists of desk research, gray and scientific literature review, and a semi-structured interview with 27 indicators. By employing these strategies, the research evaluates Arba Minch's governance capacity to implement ecological sanitation integration with urban agriculture. The findings of the study show that Arba Minch City's governance capacity to integrate ecosan with urban farming is affected by several factors. These factors include a lack of systematic monitoring and evaluation of previous projects, fragmentation of policy tools to govern the integration of the system, and a lack of adequate public sector participation. Additionally, there is no government body responsible for integrating the system, and various non-governmental organizations play a significant role in financing, organizing, and implementing the system. On the user side, the study reveals a behavioral gap in adapting to resource-oriented sanitation technology and recovered organic fertilizer. The findings suggest that long-term system management requires a strong, active, and well-trained community group capable of taking on the role and responsibility of running similar projects. Furthermore, to mitigate the policy fragmentation challenge, policy harmonization and integration among actors to negotiate, deliberate, and agree on measures to be taken are critical. In conclusion, the study suggests that similar project developers should investigate the factors that motivate users of new technology and influence their behavioral changes. Ultimately, the study recommends a more comprehensive approach to resource-oriented sanitation technology and urban agriculture integration that takes into account governance capacity and community engagement.","PeriodicalId":33686,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Cities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1153502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research study aims to assess the capacity of Arba Minch City to adopt resource-oriented sanitation technology and integrate it with urban agriculture. The overarching goal is to promote sustainable urban development by not only using resources efficiently but also recovering resources from urban waste streams. To measure the city's governance capacity, the study employs a Governance Capability Framework (GCF), which identifies nine conditions and three indicators for each condition across three dimensions: knowing, wanting, and enabling. The framework helps assess the city's capacity for governance throughout the integration of urban agriculture with ecological sanitation (ecosan) technology. The research employs a triangle strategy, which consists of desk research, gray and scientific literature review, and a semi-structured interview with 27 indicators. By employing these strategies, the research evaluates Arba Minch's governance capacity to implement ecological sanitation integration with urban agriculture. The findings of the study show that Arba Minch City's governance capacity to integrate ecosan with urban farming is affected by several factors. These factors include a lack of systematic monitoring and evaluation of previous projects, fragmentation of policy tools to govern the integration of the system, and a lack of adequate public sector participation. Additionally, there is no government body responsible for integrating the system, and various non-governmental organizations play a significant role in financing, organizing, and implementing the system. On the user side, the study reveals a behavioral gap in adapting to resource-oriented sanitation technology and recovered organic fertilizer. The findings suggest that long-term system management requires a strong, active, and well-trained community group capable of taking on the role and responsibility of running similar projects. Furthermore, to mitigate the policy fragmentation challenge, policy harmonization and integration among actors to negotiate, deliberate, and agree on measures to be taken are critical. In conclusion, the study suggests that similar project developers should investigate the factors that motivate users of new technology and influence their behavioral changes. Ultimately, the study recommends a more comprehensive approach to resource-oriented sanitation technology and urban agriculture integration that takes into account governance capacity and community engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将面向资源的卫生技术与发展中国家的城市农业相结合:衡量埃塞俄比亚阿尔巴明奇市的治理能力
本研究旨在评估阿尔巴明奇市采用资源型环卫技术并与都市农业相结合的能力。总体目标是促进可持续城市发展,不仅要有效利用资源,而且要从城市废物流中回收资源。为了衡量城市的治理能力,该研究采用了治理能力框架(GCF),该框架确定了九个条件和三个指标,涉及三个维度:知道、想要和使能。该框架有助于评估城市在整合城市农业与生态卫生(ecosan)技术过程中的治理能力。该研究采用了三角策略,包括案头研究、灰色文献和科学文献综述,以及包含27个指标的半结构化访谈。通过这些策略,研究评估了Arba Minch实施生态卫生与城市农业一体化的治理能力。研究结果表明,阿尔巴明奇市整合生态与城市农业的治理能力受到多个因素的影响。这些因素包括缺乏对以往项目的系统监测和评价,管理系统一体化的政策工具支离破碎,以及缺乏公共部门的充分参与。此外,没有政府机构负责整合该系统,各种非政府组织在该系统的融资、组织和实施方面发挥了重要作用。在用户方面,该研究揭示了在适应资源型卫生技术和回收有机肥方面的行为差距。研究结果表明,长期的系统管理需要一个强大的、积极的、训练有素的社区团体,能够承担运行类似项目的角色和责任。此外,为了减轻政策碎片化的挑战,各行为体之间的政策协调和整合至关重要,以便就将要采取的措施进行谈判、审议和达成一致。综上所述,该研究建议类似项目的开发者应该调查激励新技术用户并影响其行为变化的因素。最后,该研究建议采用一种更全面的方法来实现以资源为导向的卫生技术和城市农业一体化,同时考虑到治理能力和社区参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biodiversity and quality of urban green landscape affect mental restorativeness of residents in Multan, Pakistan The presence of polluting sites in urban contexts: an analysis of the effects on the dynamics of the residential real estate market The factors that influence the growth and performance of micro and small-scale enterprises in Dessie Town administration Diagnosing the voids of knowledge in the transformation process in managing and standardizing smart city development: the case of the government of Indonesia Do individuals' resist green home investment decisions? An empirical study from status quo bias and inertia perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1