The Effect of Device Type on Achievement: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Design

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Assessment Pub Date : 2022-03-02 DOI:10.1080/10627197.2022.2043742
david. rutkowski, Leslie Rutkowski, C. Flores
{"title":"The Effect of Device Type on Achievement: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Design","authors":"david. rutkowski, Leslie Rutkowski, C. Flores","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2022.2043742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As more states move to universal computer-based assessments, an emergent issue concerns the effect that device type might have on student results. Although, several research studies have explored device effects, most of these studies focused on the differences between tablets and desktops/laptops. In the current study, we distinguish between different types of devices to better examine the differences. Specifically, we used Indiana state assessment results from grades 3 and 8 and a propensity score weighting method to see if a student took the assessment on another device, would they have received the same score? Our findings suggest that there are significant differences by device type in both grades. In particular, iPad and Chromebook devices produced higher achievement when compared to Mac and PC devices. At the extreme, these differences amounted to close to a third of a standard deviation on the achievement scale.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"27 1","pages":"229 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2022.2043742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT As more states move to universal computer-based assessments, an emergent issue concerns the effect that device type might have on student results. Although, several research studies have explored device effects, most of these studies focused on the differences between tablets and desktops/laptops. In the current study, we distinguish between different types of devices to better examine the differences. Specifically, we used Indiana state assessment results from grades 3 and 8 and a propensity score weighting method to see if a student took the assessment on another device, would they have received the same score? Our findings suggest that there are significant differences by device type in both grades. In particular, iPad and Chromebook devices produced higher achievement when compared to Mac and PC devices. At the extreme, these differences amounted to close to a third of a standard deviation on the achievement scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设备类型对成就的影响:来自准实验设计的证据
摘要随着越来越多的州转向普遍的基于计算机的评估,一个紧急问题涉及设备类型可能对学生成绩的影响。尽管有几项研究探讨了设备的影响,但大多数研究都集中在平板电脑和台式机/笔记本电脑之间的差异上。在目前的研究中,我们区分不同类型的设备,以更好地检查差异。具体来说,我们使用了印第安纳州3年级和8年级的评估结果以及倾向得分加权方法,看看如果学生在另一台设备上进行评估,他们会得到相同的分数吗?我们的研究结果表明,两个级别的设备类型存在显著差异。特别是,与Mac和PC设备相比,iPad和Chromebook设备取得了更高的成就。在极端情况下,这些差异接近成绩表标准差的三分之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Assessment
Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
期刊最新文献
Dialect and Mathematics Performance in African American Children Who Use AAE: Insights from Explanatory IRT and Error Analysis Raising the Bar: How Revising an English Language Proficiency Assessment for Initial English Learner Classification Affects Students’ Later Academic Achievements Monitoring Rater Quality in Observational Systems: Issues Due to Unreliable Estimates of Rater Quality Improving the Precision of Classroom Observation Scores Using a Multi-Rater and Multi-Timepoint Item Response Theory Model High Stakes Assessments in Primary Schools and Teachers’ Anxiety About Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1