Tropical Forests Stand Recovery 30-year After Selectively Logged in Peninsular Malaysia

IF 0.6 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.47836/pjtas.46.3.16
Aldrich Richard, Mohamad Roslan Mohamad Kassim, Kamziah Abd. Kudus, M. Saleh
{"title":"Tropical Forests Stand Recovery 30-year After Selectively Logged in Peninsular Malaysia","authors":"Aldrich Richard, Mohamad Roslan Mohamad Kassim, Kamziah Abd. Kudus, M. Saleh","doi":"10.47836/pjtas.46.3.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analysed the 25–30 years of growth of dipterocarps forests that were logged under the Selective Management System (SMS) at three sites in Peninsular Malaysia to understand how management regimes affected forest stem density and basal area. The management regimes were (1) unlogged, (2) moderately logged forests that logged all dipterocarps ≥ 65 cm diameter at breast height (dbh) and all non-dipterocarps ≥ 60 cm dbh, and (3) intensely logged forests that logged all dipterocarps ≥ 50 cm dbh and non-dipterocarps ≥ 45 cm dbh. The intensely logged regime is similar to the SMS practices in Peninsular Malaysia. This result showed that one-year post-logging, there was no difference in the total stem density and basal area between forests logged according to the two management regimes. Forest stem density decreased over time in all management regimes, significantly greater in unlogged forests (-15.1 stems/ha/yr, confidence interval (CI): -16.9 to -13.3). This decline in stem density reflected that mortality exceeded recruitment in all management regimes. Despite the consistent decline of forest stem density, the basal area increased over time, and the rate of increase in the intensely logged forest (0.22 m2 /ha/yr, CI: 0.19 to 0.25) was significantly greater than the other management regimes. Our study showed that 30 years post-logging, the effect of selective logging remained evident. Both logged forest stem density and the basal area did not recover to that of unlogged forests, indicating the importance of enrichment planting and extending the cutting cycles beyond 30 years for the sustainability of dipterocarps forests.","PeriodicalId":19890,"journal":{"name":"Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjtas.46.3.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analysed the 25–30 years of growth of dipterocarps forests that were logged under the Selective Management System (SMS) at three sites in Peninsular Malaysia to understand how management regimes affected forest stem density and basal area. The management regimes were (1) unlogged, (2) moderately logged forests that logged all dipterocarps ≥ 65 cm diameter at breast height (dbh) and all non-dipterocarps ≥ 60 cm dbh, and (3) intensely logged forests that logged all dipterocarps ≥ 50 cm dbh and non-dipterocarps ≥ 45 cm dbh. The intensely logged regime is similar to the SMS practices in Peninsular Malaysia. This result showed that one-year post-logging, there was no difference in the total stem density and basal area between forests logged according to the two management regimes. Forest stem density decreased over time in all management regimes, significantly greater in unlogged forests (-15.1 stems/ha/yr, confidence interval (CI): -16.9 to -13.3). This decline in stem density reflected that mortality exceeded recruitment in all management regimes. Despite the consistent decline of forest stem density, the basal area increased over time, and the rate of increase in the intensely logged forest (0.22 m2 /ha/yr, CI: 0.19 to 0.25) was significantly greater than the other management regimes. Our study showed that 30 years post-logging, the effect of selective logging remained evident. Both logged forest stem density and the basal area did not recover to that of unlogged forests, indicating the importance of enrichment planting and extending the cutting cycles beyond 30 years for the sustainability of dipterocarps forests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚半岛热带森林选择性砍伐30年后的恢复情况
本文分析了马来西亚半岛三个地点在选择性管理制度(SMS)下采伐的龙掌香林25-30年的生长情况,以了解管理制度如何影响森林茎密度和基底面积。管理模式为:(1)未采伐,(2)中度采伐,采伐所有胸径≥65 cm的龙脑树和所有≥60 cm的非龙脑树,以及(3)重度采伐,采伐所有≥50 cm的龙脑树和≥45 cm的非龙脑树。这种高度记录的制度与马来西亚半岛的短信做法类似。结果表明:采伐1年后,两种管理方式采伐的林分在总茎密度和基材面积上没有差异。在所有管理制度中,森林茎密度随着时间的推移而下降,在未采伐的森林中显著增加(-15.1茎/公顷/年,置信区间(CI): -16.9至-13.3)。茎密度的下降反映了在所有管理制度中死亡率都超过了生源。尽管林干密度持续下降,但随着时间的推移,基材面积呈增加趋势,其中重度采伐林的基材面积增幅(0.22 m2 /ha/yr, CI: 0.19 ~ 0.25)显著高于其他管理模式。研究表明,在采伐30年后,选择性采伐的影响仍然明显。采伐后森林的茎密度和基材面积均未恢复到未采伐时的水平,说明丰富种植和延长采伐周期超过30年对龙心蕨林的可持续性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science
Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
64
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound and Steam Explosion Treatments on the Quantity and Molecular Size of Soluble Fibre Obtained from Un-purified and Purified Rice Bran Diversity of Wild Gingers (Zingiberaceae) in Southern Peninsular Malaysia: Panti Forest Reserve and Labis Forest Reserve Antidiabetic Activity of Bengkuang (Pachyrhizus erosus) Extracts in Diabetes Mellitus-induced Rats Performance of Climbing Perch (Anabas testudineus) and Bok Choy (Brassica chinensis) in Aquaponics Systems Using Nutrient Film Technique in Indonesian Small-scale Livestock Determination of Antioxidant Activity, Phenolic Compounds, and Toxicity of Methanolic and Ethanolic Extracts of Pink Pigmented Facultative Methylotrophs (PPFM) Bacteria Pigment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1