‘Akerman’ on-screen: Chantal Akerman behind and before the camera, and after cinema

G. Pollock
{"title":"‘Akerman’ on-screen: Chantal Akerman behind and before the camera, and after cinema","authors":"G. Pollock","doi":"10.1386/miraj_00002_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To challenge the increasing tendency to read Chantal Akerman’s oeuvre autobiographically, this article analyses two documentaries on the filmmaker. It theorizes the effects of the increasingly frequent appearance of the filmmaker on screen in such documentaries and in her own\n films by reviewing both tendencies through the classic debates about authorship. Noting and critiquing the way in which the documentary filmmakers attempt to mimic ‘Akerman’ filmmaking, the article argues that their attempts betray the codes that constitute ‘Akerman’\n cinema by reproducing the modes against which her cinema worked. ‘Akerman’ names a cinematic journey towards the formulation of an aesthetic language of space, shot, frame and temporality through which to make visible the unseen and make audible the unspoken that constituted both\n the conditions and the imperative for a cinematic intervention from a historically situated post-war, post-Shoah ‘Polish Jewish family in Brussels’. This article proposes the term filmworking (drawing on Bracha Ettinger’s post-traumatic concept of artworking) to reveal how\n Akerman queered cinema. This effect emerges only from close analysis of each instance of filmworking and not from the closed tropes of a retrospective narrative of the life of the filmmaker, who, being repeatedly interviewed, herself contributed to such extra-cinematic explanations and closures\n of her own work.","PeriodicalId":36761,"journal":{"name":"Moving Image Review and Art Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moving Image Review and Art Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/miraj_00002_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To challenge the increasing tendency to read Chantal Akerman’s oeuvre autobiographically, this article analyses two documentaries on the filmmaker. It theorizes the effects of the increasingly frequent appearance of the filmmaker on screen in such documentaries and in her own films by reviewing both tendencies through the classic debates about authorship. Noting and critiquing the way in which the documentary filmmakers attempt to mimic ‘Akerman’ filmmaking, the article argues that their attempts betray the codes that constitute ‘Akerman’ cinema by reproducing the modes against which her cinema worked. ‘Akerman’ names a cinematic journey towards the formulation of an aesthetic language of space, shot, frame and temporality through which to make visible the unseen and make audible the unspoken that constituted both the conditions and the imperative for a cinematic intervention from a historically situated post-war, post-Shoah ‘Polish Jewish family in Brussels’. This article proposes the term filmworking (drawing on Bracha Ettinger’s post-traumatic concept of artworking) to reveal how Akerman queered cinema. This effect emerges only from close analysis of each instance of filmworking and not from the closed tropes of a retrospective narrative of the life of the filmmaker, who, being repeatedly interviewed, herself contributed to such extra-cinematic explanations and closures of her own work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银幕上的“阿克曼”:尚塔尔·阿克曼在镜头前后和电影之后
为了挑战人们越来越倾向于自传体地阅读尚塔尔·阿克曼的作品,本文分析了两部关于这位电影制作人的纪录片。它通过关于作者身份的经典辩论来回顾这两种趋势,从而推断出电影制作人在这类纪录片和她自己的电影中越来越频繁地出现在银幕上的影响。文章注意到并批评了纪录片制作人试图模仿“阿克曼”电影制作的方式,认为他们的尝试通过复制她的电影所针对的模式,背叛了构成“阿克曼电影”的准则阿克曼命名了一个电影之旅,通过它来形成一种空间、镜头、框架和时间的美学语言,使看不见的东西可见,使听不见的话无声,这构成了历史上处于战后、后大屠杀时期的“布鲁塞尔的波兰犹太家庭”进行电影干预的条件和必要性。这篇文章提出了电影工作这个术语(借鉴了Bracha Ettinger的创伤后艺术工作概念),以揭示阿克曼是如何颠覆电影的。这种效果只出现在对每一个电影作品的仔细分析中,而不是来自对电影制作人生活的回顾性叙事的封闭比喻中。在反复接受采访时,她自己也为自己的作品做出了额外的电影解释和封闭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Moving Image Review and Art Journal
Moving Image Review and Art Journal Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘The length of a wave’ ([2000] 2023) The allegorical re-presentation of colonial cinema in Sammy Baloji’s Pungulume (2016) Countering colonial nostalgia and heroic masculinity in the age of accelerated climate change: The Arctic artworks of Katja Aglert and Isaac Julien Landscape and the Moving Image, Catherine Elwes (2022) Patriarchs, Nira Pereg, curated by James Clegg and Show Me the World Mister, Ayo Akingbade, curated by Carmen Juliá and Olivia Aherne
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1