Comparisons of Experimental and Simulated Velocity Fields in Membrane Module Spacers

Ravikumar Gogar, G. Vaseghi, G. Lipscomb
{"title":"Comparisons of Experimental and Simulated Velocity Fields in Membrane Module Spacers","authors":"Ravikumar Gogar, G. Vaseghi, G. Lipscomb","doi":"10.22079/JMSR.2019.101683.1242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spacers are used in spiral wound and plate and frame membrane modules to create flow channels between adjacent membrane layers and mix fluid within the flow channel. Flow through the spacer has a significant beneficial impact on mixing and resulting mass transfer rates but is accompanied by an undesirable increase in pressure drop. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is a common tool used to evaluate the effect of spacer design on fluid flow. While numerous theoretical studies are reported in the literature, confirmation of simulation results through experimental velocity field measurements is limited. Comparisons of CFD simulations with experimental velocity measurements using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) for traditional symmetric diamond and asymmetric spacer designs and a novel static mixing spacer design are presented. The results include comparisons of the two velocity components in planes parallel to the flow channel walls for the diamond and asymmetric spacer as well as the first reported comparisons of all three velocity components for the static mixing spacer. The results indicate good agreement between theory and experiment and help validate the use of CFD for spacer design.","PeriodicalId":16427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Membrane Science and Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"283-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Membrane Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22079/JMSR.2019.101683.1242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spacers are used in spiral wound and plate and frame membrane modules to create flow channels between adjacent membrane layers and mix fluid within the flow channel. Flow through the spacer has a significant beneficial impact on mixing and resulting mass transfer rates but is accompanied by an undesirable increase in pressure drop. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is a common tool used to evaluate the effect of spacer design on fluid flow. While numerous theoretical studies are reported in the literature, confirmation of simulation results through experimental velocity field measurements is limited. Comparisons of CFD simulations with experimental velocity measurements using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) for traditional symmetric diamond and asymmetric spacer designs and a novel static mixing spacer design are presented. The results include comparisons of the two velocity components in planes parallel to the flow channel walls for the diamond and asymmetric spacer as well as the first reported comparisons of all three velocity components for the static mixing spacer. The results indicate good agreement between theory and experiment and help validate the use of CFD for spacer design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膜组件间隔器中实验与模拟速度场的比较
在螺旋缠绕和板框膜模块中使用间隔片,以在相邻膜层之间创建流道,并在流道内混合流体。通过隔离器的流动对混合和由此产生的传质速率有显著的有利影响,但伴随而来的是不希望出现的压降增加。计算流体动力学(CFD)是评估隔离器设计对流体流动影响的常用工具。虽然文献中报道了大量的理论研究,但通过实验速度场测量来证实模拟结果是有限的。对传统的对称金刚石和非对称隔震设计以及一种新型的静态混合隔震设计进行了CFD模拟与实验速度测量的比较。结果包括对比了平行于流道壁面上的两种速度分量,分别用于菱形和非对称间隔器,以及首次报道的静态混合间隔器的三种速度分量的比较。结果表明理论与实验结果吻合较好,有助于验证CFD在隔震设计中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Membrane Science and Research
Journal of Membrane Science and Research Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Membrane Science and Research (JMSR) is an Open Access journal with Free of Charge publication policy, which provides a focal point for academic and industrial chemical and polymer engineers, chemists, materials scientists, and membranologists working on both membranes and membrane processes, particularly for four major sectors, including Energy, Water, Environment and Food. The journal publishes original research and reviews on membranes (organic, inorganic, liquid and etc.) and membrane processes (MF, UF, NF, RO, ED, Dialysis, MD, PV, CDI, FO, GP, VP and etc.), membrane formation/structure/performance, fouling, module/process design, and processes/applications in various areas. Primary emphasis is on structure, function, and performance of essentially non-biological membranes.
期刊最新文献
Matrimid®5218/AO-PIM-1 Blend Membranes for Gas Separation Thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane comprising Pebax®1657 and porous organic polymers (POP) for favored CO2 separation New challenges and applications of supported liquid membrane systems based on facilitated transport in liquid phase separations of metallic species Effect of multi-staging in vacuum membrane distillation on productivity and temperature polarization Gas permselectivity of hyperbranched polybenzoxazole – silica hybrid membranes treated at different thermal protocols
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1