Adoption of Good Agricultural Practice to Increase Yield and Profit of Ginger Farming in Nepal

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Horticultural Research Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.2478/johr-2021-0009
Rudra Baral, B. Kafle, D. Panday, Jiban Shrestha, D. Min
{"title":"Adoption of Good Agricultural Practice to Increase Yield and Profit of Ginger Farming in Nepal","authors":"Rudra Baral, B. Kafle, D. Panday, Jiban Shrestha, D. Min","doi":"10.2478/johr-2021-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ginger (Zingiber officinale) is one of the major high-value cash crops in Nepal. Low yield, conventional farming, and limited access to production resources such as improved cultivars, production technologies, and extension services are the existing problems of Nepali ginger farmers. In this study, we conducted community based-participatory research in Ilam district, Nepal, in 2015–2017. This research aimed to explore the appropriate ginger farming technology considering yield, income, and environment. We compared the effect of four different ginger production technologies on ginger yield and net farm income that include: i) traditional practice with mother rhizome harvest, ii) traditional practice without mother rhizome harvest, iii) good agricultural practice (GAP) with mother rhizome harvest, and iv) GAP without mother rhizome harvest. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with five replications. The yield of ginger under GAP and without mother rhizome harvest was observed 17.9 t·ha−1, which was 39.8% higher than the farmers’ existing practices and 45.5% higher than the national average. The cost of production was almost the same in all treatments; however, the GAP with mother rhizome-harvested treatment gave the highest benefit–cost ratio (1.5) along with the maximum net farm income ($2072.6·ha−1·year−1). Thus, we suggest ginger producers adopting GAP rules to obtain a higher yield and harvesting mother rhizomes earlier for obtaining maximum profit. The GAP rules will additionally protect the environment. This study also suggests policymakers and related stakeholders promoting GAP as a sustainable production technology in agriculture-based countries like Nepal.","PeriodicalId":16065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Horticultural Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Horticultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2021-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Ginger (Zingiber officinale) is one of the major high-value cash crops in Nepal. Low yield, conventional farming, and limited access to production resources such as improved cultivars, production technologies, and extension services are the existing problems of Nepali ginger farmers. In this study, we conducted community based-participatory research in Ilam district, Nepal, in 2015–2017. This research aimed to explore the appropriate ginger farming technology considering yield, income, and environment. We compared the effect of four different ginger production technologies on ginger yield and net farm income that include: i) traditional practice with mother rhizome harvest, ii) traditional practice without mother rhizome harvest, iii) good agricultural practice (GAP) with mother rhizome harvest, and iv) GAP without mother rhizome harvest. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with five replications. The yield of ginger under GAP and without mother rhizome harvest was observed 17.9 t·ha−1, which was 39.8% higher than the farmers’ existing practices and 45.5% higher than the national average. The cost of production was almost the same in all treatments; however, the GAP with mother rhizome-harvested treatment gave the highest benefit–cost ratio (1.5) along with the maximum net farm income ($2072.6·ha−1·year−1). Thus, we suggest ginger producers adopting GAP rules to obtain a higher yield and harvesting mother rhizomes earlier for obtaining maximum profit. The GAP rules will additionally protect the environment. This study also suggests policymakers and related stakeholders promoting GAP as a sustainable production technology in agriculture-based countries like Nepal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用良好农业实践提高尼泊尔生姜种植的产量和利润
生姜(Zingiber officinale)是尼泊尔主要的高价值经济作物之一。低产量、传统耕作方式以及获得改良品种、生产技术和推广服务等生产资源的机会有限是尼泊尔姜农存在的问题。在这项研究中,我们于2015-2017年在尼泊尔伊拉姆地区进行了基于社区的参与性研究。本研究旨在探索综合考虑产量、收入和环境因素的生姜适宜养殖技术。本研究比较了四种不同生姜生产工艺对生姜产量和农场净收入的影响,包括:1)传统做法有根茎收获,2)传统做法没有根茎收获,3)良好农业规范(GAP)有根茎收获,4)GAP没有根茎收获。试验采用随机完全区组设计,共5个重复。GAP下未收获母根的生姜产量为17.9 t·ha - 1,比农户现有做法高39.8%,比全国平均水平高45.5%。所有处理的生产成本几乎相同;然而,GAP与母根茎收获处理的效益成本比最高(1.5),农场净收入最高(2072.6美元·公顷- 1·年- 1)。因此,我们建议生姜生产者采用GAP规则以获得更高的产量,并尽早收获母根茎以获得最大的利润。GAP规则还将保护环境。该研究还建议政策制定者和相关利益相关者在尼泊尔等以农业为基础的国家推广GAP作为可持续生产技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Horticultural Research
Journal of Horticultural Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identification and Validation of New Reference Genes for Normalization of Gene Expression in Flower and Berry Developmental Stages of Interspecific Grape Hybrid V. vinifera (L.) × V. labrusca (L.) Gibberellic Acid Spray Modulates Fruiting, Yield, Quality, and Shelf Life of Rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum L.) Effect of the Biostimulants of Microbiological Origin on the Entomopathogenic and Plant Parasitic Nematodes from Miscanthus × Giganteus Plantations Variability of Air Temperature in Skierniewice, Poland, Over the Period 1923–2022 Effects of Silver, Gold, and Platinum Nanoparticles on Selected Nematode Trophic Groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1