{"title":"Diverging incentives for reforming China’s restrictions on digital innovations","authors":"M. Ferracane, Hosuk Lee-Makiyama","doi":"10.1108/JCEFTS-06-2017-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThis paper aims to investigate China’s policy on digital trade with the objective to highlight the rationales behind such policy. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nChina’s policy on digital trade is assessed by analysing the main regulations imposed in the country in the period from 1985 to 2016 that have an impact on digital trade. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nIt was found that there are more than 70 measures imposed today that have a negative impact on digital trade. The measures are diverse and can be justified with several policy objectives, namely, industrial policy, public order and national security, and these support China’s fiscal and state-owned enterprise structure. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThis paper analyses China’s policy on digital trade from a new perspective and provides insights on the rationales behind this policy.","PeriodicalId":44245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"259-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JCEFTS-06-2017-0016","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCEFTS-06-2017-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to investigate China’s policy on digital trade with the objective to highlight the rationales behind such policy.
Design/methodology/approach
China’s policy on digital trade is assessed by analysing the main regulations imposed in the country in the period from 1985 to 2016 that have an impact on digital trade.
Findings
It was found that there are more than 70 measures imposed today that have a negative impact on digital trade. The measures are diverse and can be justified with several policy objectives, namely, industrial policy, public order and national security, and these support China’s fiscal and state-owned enterprise structure.
Originality/value
This paper analyses China’s policy on digital trade from a new perspective and provides insights on the rationales behind this policy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies (JCEFTS) negotiates China''s unique position within the international economy, and its interaction across the globe. From a truly international perspective, the journal publishes both qualitative and quantitative research in all areas of Chinese business and foreign trade, technical economics, business environment and business strategy. JCEFTS publishes high quality research papers, viewpoints, conceptual papers, case studies, literature reviews and general views. Emphasis is placed on the publication of articles which seek to link theory with application, or critically analyse real situations in terms of Chinese economics and business in China, with the objective of identifying good practice in these areas and assisting in the development of more appropriate arrangements for addressing crucial issues of Chinese economics and business. Papers accepted for publication will be double–blind peer-reviewed to ensure academic rigour and integrity.