{"title":"Context-dependent outcome expectation contributes to experience-based\n risky choice","authors":"Zhijian He, Junyi Dai","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Previous research has demonstrated systematic discrepancies between\n description- and experience-based risky choices. This\n description-experience gap has been\n attributed to several factors such as reliance on small samples and\n differential probability weighting patterns. Because context-dependent\n outcome expectation regarding safe options might influence experience-based\n risky choices, it constitutes another potential contributor to the gap.\n Using a free-sampling paradigm and risky options with rare outcomes that\n were either attractive or unattractive relative to the frequent ones, two\n experiments examined the existence and impact of such outcome expectation in\n experience-based risky choices. Both experiments had two information\n conditions: hint information meant to eliminate outcome expectation was\n provided in one condition but not the other. Experiment 1, which indicated\n the numbers of possible outcomes regarding both safe and risky options under\n the hint condition, revealed different choice behaviors regarding risky-safe\n trials between the two information conditions, no matter whether the rare\n outcome of the risky option in such a trial (i.e., the\n local context) was attractive or\n unattractive. However, this result provided only indirect evidence for the\n role of outcome expectation because it was unclear whether the hint\n information affected only the outcome expectation and thus evaluation of\n safe options or the evaluations of both safe and risky ones. With refined\n hint information arguably removing potential impacts on the evaluation of\n risky options, Experiment 2 showed that expectation of a non-existent rare\n outcome of safe options did contribute to experience-based risky choices. In\n addition, it appeared that the rare outcomes of the risky options in other\n decision problems presented in the same experiment (i.e., the\n global context) also affected outcome\n expectation. Future research could investigate how the interaction between\n local and global contexts determines outcome expectation to deepen our\n understanding of its contribution to experience-based risky choice and the\n description-experience gap.","PeriodicalId":48045,"journal":{"name":"Judgment and Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judgment and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated systematic discrepancies between
description- and experience-based risky choices. This
description-experience gap has been
attributed to several factors such as reliance on small samples and
differential probability weighting patterns. Because context-dependent
outcome expectation regarding safe options might influence experience-based
risky choices, it constitutes another potential contributor to the gap.
Using a free-sampling paradigm and risky options with rare outcomes that
were either attractive or unattractive relative to the frequent ones, two
experiments examined the existence and impact of such outcome expectation in
experience-based risky choices. Both experiments had two information
conditions: hint information meant to eliminate outcome expectation was
provided in one condition but not the other. Experiment 1, which indicated
the numbers of possible outcomes regarding both safe and risky options under
the hint condition, revealed different choice behaviors regarding risky-safe
trials between the two information conditions, no matter whether the rare
outcome of the risky option in such a trial (i.e., the
local context) was attractive or
unattractive. However, this result provided only indirect evidence for the
role of outcome expectation because it was unclear whether the hint
information affected only the outcome expectation and thus evaluation of
safe options or the evaluations of both safe and risky ones. With refined
hint information arguably removing potential impacts on the evaluation of
risky options, Experiment 2 showed that expectation of a non-existent rare
outcome of safe options did contribute to experience-based risky choices. In
addition, it appeared that the rare outcomes of the risky options in other
decision problems presented in the same experiment (i.e., the
global context) also affected outcome
expectation. Future research could investigate how the interaction between
local and global contexts determines outcome expectation to deepen our
understanding of its contribution to experience-based risky choice and the
description-experience gap.