Context-dependent outcome expectation contributes to experience-based risky choice

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1017/s1930297500009037
Zhijian He, Junyi Dai
{"title":"Context-dependent outcome expectation contributes to experience-based\n risky choice","authors":"Zhijian He, Junyi Dai","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Previous research has demonstrated systematic discrepancies between\n description- and experience-based risky choices. This\n description-experience gap has been\n attributed to several factors such as reliance on small samples and\n differential probability weighting patterns. Because context-dependent\n outcome expectation regarding safe options might influence experience-based\n risky choices, it constitutes another potential contributor to the gap.\n Using a free-sampling paradigm and risky options with rare outcomes that\n were either attractive or unattractive relative to the frequent ones, two\n experiments examined the existence and impact of such outcome expectation in\n experience-based risky choices. Both experiments had two information\n conditions: hint information meant to eliminate outcome expectation was\n provided in one condition but not the other. Experiment 1, which indicated\n the numbers of possible outcomes regarding both safe and risky options under\n the hint condition, revealed different choice behaviors regarding risky-safe\n trials between the two information conditions, no matter whether the rare\n outcome of the risky option in such a trial (i.e., the\n local context) was attractive or\n unattractive. However, this result provided only indirect evidence for the\n role of outcome expectation because it was unclear whether the hint\n information affected only the outcome expectation and thus evaluation of\n safe options or the evaluations of both safe and risky ones. With refined\n hint information arguably removing potential impacts on the evaluation of\n risky options, Experiment 2 showed that expectation of a non-existent rare\n outcome of safe options did contribute to experience-based risky choices. In\n addition, it appeared that the rare outcomes of the risky options in other\n decision problems presented in the same experiment (i.e., the\n global context) also affected outcome\n expectation. Future research could investigate how the interaction between\n local and global contexts determines outcome expectation to deepen our\n understanding of its contribution to experience-based risky choice and the\n description-experience gap.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated systematic discrepancies between description- and experience-based risky choices. This description-experience gap has been attributed to several factors such as reliance on small samples and differential probability weighting patterns. Because context-dependent outcome expectation regarding safe options might influence experience-based risky choices, it constitutes another potential contributor to the gap. Using a free-sampling paradigm and risky options with rare outcomes that were either attractive or unattractive relative to the frequent ones, two experiments examined the existence and impact of such outcome expectation in experience-based risky choices. Both experiments had two information conditions: hint information meant to eliminate outcome expectation was provided in one condition but not the other. Experiment 1, which indicated the numbers of possible outcomes regarding both safe and risky options under the hint condition, revealed different choice behaviors regarding risky-safe trials between the two information conditions, no matter whether the rare outcome of the risky option in such a trial (i.e., the local context) was attractive or unattractive. However, this result provided only indirect evidence for the role of outcome expectation because it was unclear whether the hint information affected only the outcome expectation and thus evaluation of safe options or the evaluations of both safe and risky ones. With refined hint information arguably removing potential impacts on the evaluation of risky options, Experiment 2 showed that expectation of a non-existent rare outcome of safe options did contribute to experience-based risky choices. In addition, it appeared that the rare outcomes of the risky options in other decision problems presented in the same experiment (i.e., the global context) also affected outcome expectation. Future research could investigate how the interaction between local and global contexts determines outcome expectation to deepen our understanding of its contribution to experience-based risky choice and the description-experience gap.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情境依赖的结果预期有助于基于经验的风险选择
先前的研究已经证明了基于描述和基于经验的风险选择之间存在系统性差异。这种描述-经验差距归因于几个因素,如对小样本和微分概率加权模式的依赖。由于对安全选项的情境依赖的结果预期可能影响基于经验的风险选择,因此它构成了另一个潜在的差异因素。使用自由抽样范式和风险选择,其结果与频繁的结果相比要么有吸引力,要么没有吸引力,两个实验检验了这种结果预期在基于经验的风险选择中的存在和影响。两个实验都有两种信息条件:在一种条件下提供消除结果期望的提示信息,而在另一种条件下不提供提示信息。实验1显示了提示条件下安全选项和风险选项的可能结果数量,揭示了两种信息条件下风险-安全选项的不同选择行为,无论该试验中风险选项的罕见结果(即局部情境)是吸引还是不吸引。然而,该结果仅为结果预期的作用提供了间接证据,因为尚不清楚提示信息是否仅影响结果预期,从而影响对安全选项的评估,还是同时影响对安全和风险选项的评估。由于精炼的提示信息可以消除对风险选项评估的潜在影响,实验2表明,对安全选项不存在的罕见结果的预期确实有助于基于经验的风险选择。此外,在同一实验中出现的其他决策问题(即全局背景)中,风险选项的罕见结果似乎也会影响结果预期。未来的研究可以调查本地和全球背景之间的相互作用如何决定结果期望,以加深我们对其对基于经验的风险选择和描述-经验差距的贡献的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families. Does Resilience Mediate the Relationship Between Negative Self-Image and Psychological Distress in Middle-Aged and Older Gay and Bisexual Men? Intergenerational Relations and Well-being Among Older Middle Eastern/Arab American Immigrants During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Caregiving Appraisals and Emotional Valence: Moderating Effects of Activity Participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1