Can Scharpf be proved wrong? Modelling the EU into a competitive social market economy for the next generation

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW European Law Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-13 DOI:10.1111/eulj.12406
Amandine Crespy
{"title":"Can Scharpf be proved wrong? Modelling the EU into a competitive social market economy for the next generation","authors":"Amandine Crespy","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Criticism of the EU’s social deficit has become more vivid than ever following the socially regressive handling of the 2008–10 financial and debt crisis. In 2010, Fritz Scharpf famously argued that the EU ‘cannot be a social market economy’ owing to its institutional architecture, legal features, and collective action issues. The COVID-19 pandemic has nevertheless led to a new agenda combining investment, social concerns, the green transition and more fiscal solidarity. However, a lot remains to be done, it is argued, to bridge the social gap. A three-pronged model is outlined to conceive of the EU’s role in enhancing national, inter-national and transnational social cohesion. The paper furthermore points to where the EU’s action must be intensified to make significant progress on the way to a competitive and social market economy. In many respects, the hard political battles remain to be fought.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"26 5-6","pages":"319-330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Criticism of the EU’s social deficit has become more vivid than ever following the socially regressive handling of the 2008–10 financial and debt crisis. In 2010, Fritz Scharpf famously argued that the EU ‘cannot be a social market economy’ owing to its institutional architecture, legal features, and collective action issues. The COVID-19 pandemic has nevertheless led to a new agenda combining investment, social concerns, the green transition and more fiscal solidarity. However, a lot remains to be done, it is argued, to bridge the social gap. A three-pronged model is outlined to conceive of the EU’s role in enhancing national, inter-national and transnational social cohesion. The paper furthermore points to where the EU’s action must be intensified to make significant progress on the way to a competitive and social market economy. In many respects, the hard political battles remain to be fought.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夏普夫是错的吗?为下一代把欧盟塑造成一个有竞争力的社会市场经济
在2008-10年金融和债务危机的社会倒退处理之后,对欧盟社会赤字的批评变得比以往任何时候都更加生动。2010年,弗里茨·夏普夫(Fritz Scharpf)提出了一个著名的观点,即由于欧盟的制度架构、法律特征和集体行动问题,欧盟“不可能成为社会市场经济”。然而,2019冠状病毒病大流行引发了一项新的议程,该议程结合了投资、社会关切、绿色转型和更大的财政团结。然而,有人认为,要弥合社会差距还有很多工作要做。本文概述了一个三管齐下的模式,以设想欧盟在加强国家、国际和跨国社会凝聚力方面的作用。该文件进一步指出,欧盟必须加强哪些方面的行动,才能在通往竞争和社会市场经济的道路上取得重大进展。在许多方面,艰难的政治斗争仍有待进行。©2022 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The European Law Journal represents an authoritative new approach to the study of European Law, developed specifically to express and develop the study and understanding of European law in its social, cultural, political and economic context. It has a highly reputed board of editors. The journal fills a major gap in the current literature on all issues of European law, and is essential reading for anyone studying or practising EU law and its diverse impact on the environment, national legal systems, local government, economic organizations, and European citizens. As well as focusing on the European Union, the journal also examines the national legal systems of countries in Western, Central and Eastern Europe and relations between Europe and other parts of the world, particularly the United States, Japan, China, India, Mercosur and developing countries. The journal is published in English but is dedicated to publishing native language articles and has a dedicated translation fund available for this purpose. It is a refereed journal.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Hungary's attacks on human dignity: Article 2 TEU and the foundations of democracy in the European Union The politics of integration in retrospect and the supranational mega-politics of governance and design in prospect: A roadmap Strategic foresight as a beacon for the new EU industrial policy Dare scholars look to the future? Academia and strategic foresight for the European Union's foreign policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1