The Identity of “Joseon Film”: Between Colonial Cinema and National Cinema

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES KOREA JOURNAL Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.25024/kj.2019.59.4.16
Chung Chonghwa
{"title":"The Identity of “Joseon Film”: Between Colonial Cinema and National Cinema","authors":"Chung Chonghwa","doi":"10.25024/kj.2019.59.4.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inspired by the idea that Korean films during the colonial and post-liberation periods (1919–1948) constantly question the boundaries of Korean national cinema, this article suggests that those films produced during the periods be designated as “Joseon film” (Joseon yeonghwa) and aims to examine the backdrops and potential effects of the nomenclature. In doing so, this paper reexamines the boundaries of Korean film history. At the center of this discourse are ten Joseon films the Korea Film Archive has rediscovered over the past decade, of which this article focuses on three Tuition (1940), Angels on the Streets (1941), and Seagull (1948); all discovered at overseas film archives. These three films constantly evoke and prompt questions on the conceptual definition of Korean film, even though they have been included in the historiography of early Korean cinema and been preserved materially in the Korean Film Archive. Tuition and Angels on the Streets, dating from the Japanese colonial period, and Seagull, dating from the post-liberation period. I examine their production and distribution on the boundaries between Joseon and Korean cinema and between colonial and nation-state cinema. Although the former two films aimed at becoming imperial Japan’s state (Gukka) films, they came to be categorized as Joseon (Minjok, ethnic) cinema by imperial Japan since the colonial realities reflected in the film were problematic to mainland Japan. The nationbuilding propaganda film Seagull, which was produced and distributed in 1948, had to start negotiating with the state to become South Korean film. It could not be legitimated as a South Korean film as it was filmed, since the print was confiscated by the authorities due to the actors who defected to North Korea. Reviewing the designations of and the boundaries between Joseon and Korean cinema, this article takes a critical approach to Korean film historiography of the Japanese colonial and post-liberation periods in Korea.","PeriodicalId":44424,"journal":{"name":"KOREA JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KOREA JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2019.59.4.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Inspired by the idea that Korean films during the colonial and post-liberation periods (1919–1948) constantly question the boundaries of Korean national cinema, this article suggests that those films produced during the periods be designated as “Joseon film” (Joseon yeonghwa) and aims to examine the backdrops and potential effects of the nomenclature. In doing so, this paper reexamines the boundaries of Korean film history. At the center of this discourse are ten Joseon films the Korea Film Archive has rediscovered over the past decade, of which this article focuses on three Tuition (1940), Angels on the Streets (1941), and Seagull (1948); all discovered at overseas film archives. These three films constantly evoke and prompt questions on the conceptual definition of Korean film, even though they have been included in the historiography of early Korean cinema and been preserved materially in the Korean Film Archive. Tuition and Angels on the Streets, dating from the Japanese colonial period, and Seagull, dating from the post-liberation period. I examine their production and distribution on the boundaries between Joseon and Korean cinema and between colonial and nation-state cinema. Although the former two films aimed at becoming imperial Japan’s state (Gukka) films, they came to be categorized as Joseon (Minjok, ethnic) cinema by imperial Japan since the colonial realities reflected in the film were problematic to mainland Japan. The nationbuilding propaganda film Seagull, which was produced and distributed in 1948, had to start negotiating with the state to become South Korean film. It could not be legitimated as a South Korean film as it was filmed, since the print was confiscated by the authorities due to the actors who defected to North Korea. Reviewing the designations of and the boundaries between Joseon and Korean cinema, this article takes a critical approach to Korean film historiography of the Japanese colonial and post-liberation periods in Korea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“朝鲜电影”的身份:在殖民地电影与国家电影之间
受殖民地和解放后时期(1919–1948)韩国电影不断质疑韩国国家电影界限的想法启发,本文建议将这些时期制作的电影命名为“朝鲜电影”(朝鲜电影),并旨在研究命名的背景和潜在影响。在此过程中,本文重新审视了韩国电影史的界限。这场讨论的中心是韩国电影档案馆在过去十年中重新发现的十部朝鲜电影,其中本文重点关注三部《学费》(1940年)、《街头天使》(1941年)和《海鸥》(1948年);都是在海外电影档案馆发现的。这三部电影不断引发人们对韩国电影概念定义的质疑,尽管它们已被纳入韩国早期电影的史学,并在韩国电影档案馆中得到了实质性的保存。《街上的学费和天使》,可追溯到日本殖民时期,《海鸥》,可回溯到解放后时期。我以朝鲜电影和韩国电影以及殖民地电影和民族国家电影之间的界限来审视它们的制作和发行。尽管前两部电影旨在成为日本帝国的国家电影,但由于电影中反映的殖民现实对日本大陆来说是有问题的,它们被日本帝国归类为朝鲜电影。1948年制作和发行的建国宣传片《海鸥》不得不开始与国家谈判,成为韩国电影。这部电影在拍摄过程中无法被合法化为韩国电影,因为由于叛逃到朝鲜的演员,印刷品被当局没收。本文通过考察朝鲜电影与韩国电影的名称和界限,对日本殖民时期和解放后的韩国电影史学进行了批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
KOREA JOURNAL
KOREA JOURNAL ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Korea Journal (ISSN 0023-3900) was founded as an English journal in 1961 with the ultimate aim of globally promoting all facets of Korean Studies. It appeared as a monthly until 1990, then became a quarterly publication and, more importantly, made a concentrated effort to become an academic journal. In the beginning, the Korea Journal primarily focused on the introduction of traditional Korean culture to the world, but has recently shifted its focus by becoming a medium for intellectual dialogue and exchange between Korean and foreign scholars in the field of Korean Studies. The Journal includes articles, debates, book reviews and book notes.
期刊最新文献
Future Public Conflicts That Aging Will Bring in Korea: A Comparative Analysis of Korea and Japan Protestantisms and the Design of South Korea “You Can’t Help But Love Them”: BTS, Transcultural Fandom, and Affective Identities Hallyu and Film Adaptation: Maids of Decolonization in Park Chan-wook’s The Handmaiden Beyond Continuity: The Defiance of Ordinary Citizens and the 2016 Candlelight Protests in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1