Limitations of acoustic monitoring at wind turbines to evaluate fatality risk of bats

IF 4.3 2区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY Mammal Review Pub Date : 2021-03-24 DOI:10.1111/mam.12248
Christian C. Voigt, Danilo Russo, Volker Runkel, Holger R. Goerlitz
{"title":"Limitations of acoustic monitoring at wind turbines to evaluate fatality risk of bats","authors":"Christian C. Voigt,&nbsp;Danilo Russo,&nbsp;Volker Runkel,&nbsp;Holger R. Goerlitz","doi":"10.1111/mam.12248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wind turbines (WTs) frequently kill bats worldwide. During environmental impact assessments, consultant ecologists often use automated ultrasonic detectors (AUDs) to estimate the activity and identity of bats in the zone of highest mortality risk at WTs in order to formulate mitigation schemes, such as increased curtailment speeds to prevent casualties. While acknowledging the potential of acoustic monitoring, we evaluate the limitations of AUDs for monitoring bats at WTs and highlight directions for future research. We show that geometric attenuation and atmospheric attenuation of ultrasonic echolocation calls, in conjunction with limited sensitivity of ultrasonic microphones, severely constrain detection distances of bats at WTs. Taking into account the acoustic shadow produced by the nacelle, AUDs cover only approximately 23% of the risk zone for a bat calling at 20 kHz and 4% for a bat calling at 40 kHz, assuming a 60 m blade length. This percentage will further decrease with increasing blade lengths in modern WTs. Additionally, the directionality of echolocation calls and the dynamic flight behaviour of bats constrain the detectability of bats. If a call can be detected, the low interspecific and high intraspecific variation of echolocation call characteristics may impair species identification, limiting the power to predict population-level effects of fatalities. We conclude that technical, physical, and biological factors severely constrain acoustic monitoring in its current form. We suggest the use of several AUDs, installed at complementary sites at WTs, and the testing of other techniques, such as radar, cameras, and thermal imaging, to inform stakeholders on the mortality risk of bats at WTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49893,"journal":{"name":"Mammal Review","volume":"51 4","pages":"559-570"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/mam.12248","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mammal Review","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mam.12248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Wind turbines (WTs) frequently kill bats worldwide. During environmental impact assessments, consultant ecologists often use automated ultrasonic detectors (AUDs) to estimate the activity and identity of bats in the zone of highest mortality risk at WTs in order to formulate mitigation schemes, such as increased curtailment speeds to prevent casualties. While acknowledging the potential of acoustic monitoring, we evaluate the limitations of AUDs for monitoring bats at WTs and highlight directions for future research. We show that geometric attenuation and atmospheric attenuation of ultrasonic echolocation calls, in conjunction with limited sensitivity of ultrasonic microphones, severely constrain detection distances of bats at WTs. Taking into account the acoustic shadow produced by the nacelle, AUDs cover only approximately 23% of the risk zone for a bat calling at 20 kHz and 4% for a bat calling at 40 kHz, assuming a 60 m blade length. This percentage will further decrease with increasing blade lengths in modern WTs. Additionally, the directionality of echolocation calls and the dynamic flight behaviour of bats constrain the detectability of bats. If a call can be detected, the low interspecific and high intraspecific variation of echolocation call characteristics may impair species identification, limiting the power to predict population-level effects of fatalities. We conclude that technical, physical, and biological factors severely constrain acoustic monitoring in its current form. We suggest the use of several AUDs, installed at complementary sites at WTs, and the testing of other techniques, such as radar, cameras, and thermal imaging, to inform stakeholders on the mortality risk of bats at WTs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风力涡轮机声学监测评估蝙蝠死亡风险的局限性
风力涡轮机(WTs)经常杀死世界各地的蝙蝠。在环境影响评估期间,顾问生态学家经常使用自动超声波探测器(AUDs)来估计野生动植物保护区死亡风险最高区域内蝙蝠的活动和身份,以便制定缓解方案,例如提高削减速度以防止人员伤亡。在承认声学监测潜力的同时,我们评估了aud在WTs监测蝙蝠的局限性,并强调了未来研究的方向。我们发现超声波回声定位呼叫的几何衰减和大气衰减,加上超声波麦克风的有限灵敏度,严重限制了蝙蝠在WTs的探测距离。考虑到短舱产生的声学阴影,假设叶片长度为60米,对于在20 kHz频率鸣叫的蝙蝠,AUDs仅覆盖约23%的风险区域,对于在40 kHz频率鸣叫的蝙蝠,AUDs仅覆盖4%的风险区域。在现代wt中,这一比例将随着叶片长度的增加而进一步降低。此外,回声定位呼叫的方向性和蝙蝠的动态飞行行为限制了蝙蝠的可探测性。如果一种叫声可以被检测到,回声定位叫声特征的低种间和高种内变化可能会损害物种识别,限制预测种群水平死亡效应的能力。我们的结论是,技术、物理和生物因素严重限制了目前形式的声学监测。我们建议使用几个aud,安装在野生动物保护区的互补地点,并测试其他技术,如雷达、摄像机和热成像,以告知利益相关者野生动物保护区蝙蝠的死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Modeling Method of Miniaturized Nonlinear All-Optical Diffraction Deep Neural Network Based on 10.6 μm Wavelength
IF 1 4区 物理与天体物理激光与光电子学进展Pub Date : 2021-04-16 DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0820001
孙一宸 Sun Yichen, 董明利 Dong Mingli, 于明鑫 Yu Mingxin, 夏嘉斌 Xia Jiabin, 张. Z. Xu, 白雨晨 Bai Yuchen, 鹿利单 Lu Lidan, 祝连庆 Zhu Lianqing
An improved all-optical diffractive deep neural network with less parameters for gesture recognition
IF 2.6 4区 计算机科学Journal of Visual Communication and Image RepresentationPub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2022.103688
Yuanguo Zhou , Shan Shui , Yijun Cai , Chengying Chen , Yingshi Chen , Reza Abdi-Ghaleh
All-optical convolutional neural network with on-chip integrable optical average pooling for image classification
IF 1.7 1区 化学Accounts of Chemical ResearchPub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1364/ao.524502
Xiaofeng Shao, Jingyi Su, Minghao Lu, Wen Cao, Yuqing Lu, Jin Wang
来源期刊
Mammal Review
Mammal Review 生物-动物学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mammal Review is the official scientific periodical of the Mammal Society, and covers all aspects of mammalian biology and ecology, including behavioural ecology, biogeography, conservation, ecology, ethology, evolution, genetics, human ecology, management, morphology, and taxonomy. We publish Reviews drawing together information from various sources in the public domain for a new synthesis or analysis of mammalian biology; Predictive Reviews using quantitative models to provide insights into mammalian biology; Perspectives presenting original views on any aspect of mammalian biology; Comments in response to papers published in Mammal Review; and Short Communications describing new findings or methods in mammalian biology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Holocene biogeography of the southwestern European white-toothed shrew (Crocidura iculisma, Eulipotyphla) through its fossil record Use of lure sticks for non-invasive genetic sampling of European wildcat populations: lessons learnt and hints for future insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1