J. C. Fernández-Caballero, Alberto A. Hernández-Luna, D. Sobek, R. Ramírez-Mendoza
{"title":"Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method for the problem statement in set-based design","authors":"J. C. Fernández-Caballero, Alberto A. Hernández-Luna, D. Sobek, R. Ramírez-Mendoza","doi":"10.1177/03064190231181339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Given-Find-Solution (GFS) method is a widely used procedure to systematically understand “what the problem is” in engineering problems. Nevertheless, the GFS method does not provide a clear guide on how to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference for design problems. Addressing this issue is crucial since the designer usually requires making assumptions to be able to propose functional solutions. The Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method and roadmap are here proposed to systematically state a design problem and requirements using fuzzy desirability functions to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference. The GFIS method lists the parameters, variables, specifications, restrictions, and preferences to facilitate the decision-making process. A comparative study was conducted with undergraduate students from Tecnológico de Monterrey enrolled in the course Design Methodologies. The students solved a band brake design problem before and after applying the GFIS method, and their performance was compared. The results showed a significant improvement in their decision-making ability, their capability to find feasible solutions, and the time required to make a design proposal.","PeriodicalId":39952,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190231181339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Given-Find-Solution (GFS) method is a widely used procedure to systematically understand “what the problem is” in engineering problems. Nevertheless, the GFS method does not provide a clear guide on how to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference for design problems. Addressing this issue is crucial since the designer usually requires making assumptions to be able to propose functional solutions. The Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method and roadmap are here proposed to systematically state a design problem and requirements using fuzzy desirability functions to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference. The GFIS method lists the parameters, variables, specifications, restrictions, and preferences to facilitate the decision-making process. A comparative study was conducted with undergraduate students from Tecnológico de Monterrey enrolled in the course Design Methodologies. The students solved a band brake design problem before and after applying the GFIS method, and their performance was compared. The results showed a significant improvement in their decision-making ability, their capability to find feasible solutions, and the time required to make a design proposal.
给定求解(GFS)方法是一种广泛使用的程序,用于系统地理解工程问题中的“问题是什么”。然而,GFS方法并没有就如何处理设计问题的不确定性、可行性和偏好提供明确的指导。解决这个问题至关重要,因为设计者通常需要做出假设才能提出功能解决方案。本文提出了Given Find In Order To Subjected To(GFIS)方法和路线图,使用模糊期望函数来处理不确定性、可行性和偏好,系统地陈述设计问题和需求。GFIS方法列出了参数、变量、规范、限制和偏好,以便于决策过程。对蒙特雷技术学院参加设计方法学课程的本科生进行了比较研究。学生们在应用GFIS方法前后解决了一个带式制动器的设计问题,并对他们的性能进行了比较。结果表明,他们的决策能力、寻找可行解决方案的能力以及提出设计方案所需的时间都有了显著提高。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education is aimed at teachers and trainers of mechanical engineering students in higher education and focuses on the discussion of the principles and practices of training professional, technical and mechanical engineers and those in related fields. It encourages articles about new experimental methods, and laboratory techniques, and includes book reviews and highlights of recent articles in this field.