{"title":"The History of the Formation of Silhak in Modern Korea: A Preliminary Research","authors":"K. Noh","doi":"10.1353/seo.2023.a902142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the historical trajectory of the construction of historical knowledge about Korean silhak. It focuses on the formation of modern notions of silhak and the invention of modern knowledge about silhak scholars. The following four points need to be taken into account in considering the formation of silhak in modern Korea. First, the relationship between the Way and the Instrument in traditional Confucian scholarship. Second, institution and civilization, as expressed in the phrases of gyeongse chiyong (administration and practical usage) and iyong husaeng (profitable usage benefiting the people). Third, growing interest in the historical importance of Jeong Yakyong’s scholarship. Fourth, consistent interest in the value of practicality (sil). This article concludes by identifying avenues for further advances in the study of the history of Korean silhak, to expand our understanding of the interrelationship between the modern consciousness of silhak and the historical knowledge of silhak scholars.","PeriodicalId":41678,"journal":{"name":"Seoul Journal of Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seoul Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/seo.2023.a902142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:This article examines the historical trajectory of the construction of historical knowledge about Korean silhak. It focuses on the formation of modern notions of silhak and the invention of modern knowledge about silhak scholars. The following four points need to be taken into account in considering the formation of silhak in modern Korea. First, the relationship between the Way and the Instrument in traditional Confucian scholarship. Second, institution and civilization, as expressed in the phrases of gyeongse chiyong (administration and practical usage) and iyong husaeng (profitable usage benefiting the people). Third, growing interest in the historical importance of Jeong Yakyong’s scholarship. Fourth, consistent interest in the value of practicality (sil). This article concludes by identifying avenues for further advances in the study of the history of Korean silhak, to expand our understanding of the interrelationship between the modern consciousness of silhak and the historical knowledge of silhak scholars.
期刊介绍:
Published twice a year under the auspices of the Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies at Seoul National University, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies (SJKS) publishes original, state of the field research on Korea''s past and present. A peer-refereed journal, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies is distributed to institutions and scholars both internationally and domestically. Work published by SJKS comprise in-depth research on established topics as well as new areas of concern, including transnational studies, that reconfigure scholarship devoted to Korean culture, history, literature, religion, and the arts. Unique features of this journal include the explicit aim of providing an English language forum to shape the field of Korean studies both in and outside of Korea. In addition to articles that represent state of the field research, the Seoul Journal of Korean Studies publishes an extensive "Book Notes" section that places particular emphasis on introducing the very best in Korean language scholarship to scholars around the world.