No Trace Anywhere of Life, Perhaps: Autology and Hauntology in Imagination Dead Imagine

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM JOURNAL OF BECKETT STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.3366/jobs.2022.0372
F. Vozel
{"title":"No Trace Anywhere of Life, Perhaps: Autology and Hauntology in Imagination Dead Imagine","authors":"F. Vozel","doi":"10.3366/jobs.2022.0372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay interprets Imagination Dead Imagine as the product of Beckett’s own autology, in Arnold Geulincx’s sense of the term. The Cartesian occasionalist advanced that self-inspection culminates with the revelation of human beings’ fundamental ignorance and impotence. I suggest that the short text borrows Geulingian themes and imagery to offer a dazzling vision – from the point of view of eternity – of the radical atomization and opacity of the human condition. Furthermore, I explore how Beckett generates a specifically Geulingian commentary on a debate that obsessed him throughout his life: the problem of the subject-object relation and the self-to-self relation in artistic representation. Finally, I propose to read the paradoxical imperative ‘imagination dead imagine’ as a Geulingian axiom in its own right, that is, as an inescapable obligation whose fulfilment is quasi-impossible.","PeriodicalId":41421,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BECKETT STUDIES","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BECKETT STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/jobs.2022.0372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay interprets Imagination Dead Imagine as the product of Beckett’s own autology, in Arnold Geulincx’s sense of the term. The Cartesian occasionalist advanced that self-inspection culminates with the revelation of human beings’ fundamental ignorance and impotence. I suggest that the short text borrows Geulingian themes and imagery to offer a dazzling vision – from the point of view of eternity – of the radical atomization and opacity of the human condition. Furthermore, I explore how Beckett generates a specifically Geulingian commentary on a debate that obsessed him throughout his life: the problem of the subject-object relation and the self-to-self relation in artistic representation. Finally, I propose to read the paradoxical imperative ‘imagination dead imagine’ as a Geulingian axiom in its own right, that is, as an inescapable obligation whose fulfilment is quasi-impossible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
也许生命的任何地方都没有痕迹:想象中的自体学和古生物学死亡想象
本文将《想象》与《想象》解读为贝克特自述的产物,即阿诺德·格林克斯对自述的理解。笛卡儿偶然性论者提出,自我反省的高潮是揭示人类根本的无知和无能。我认为这篇短文借用了葛林的主题和意象,从永恒的角度提供了一种令人眼花缭乱的愿景,即人类状况的彻底原子化和不透明。此外,我还探讨了贝克特是如何对一个困扰他一生的争论——艺术表现中的主客体关系和自我对自我关系——产生一种特殊的葛林式评论的。最后,我建议将矛盾的命令“想象死亡想象”作为其本身权利的葛林公理来解读,也就是说,作为一种不可逃避的义务,其实现几乎是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Waiting with Beckett in the Anthropocene. ‘to hesitate to die to death’: Reading Augustine and the After-life in Echo’s Bones Samuel Beckett and Technology, ed. Galina Kiryushina, Einat Adar and Mark Nixon Notes on Contributors A ‘Classic’ Revisited: May B, Compagnie Maguy Marin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1