An Interdisciplinary Human-Environmental Examination of Effects Consistent with the Anthropocene in the Lower Illinois River Valley

IF 0.4 Q1 Arts and Humanities Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-09-02 DOI:10.1080/01461109.2017.1375067
Carol E. Colaninno, J. Chick, Terrance J. Martin, A. M. Painter, K. B. Brown, Curtis T. Dopson, Ariana O. Enzerink, S. Goesmann, Tom Higgins, Nigel Q. Knutzen, Erin N. Laute, Paula M. Long, Paige L. Ottenfeld, Abigail T. Uehling, L. Ward
{"title":"An Interdisciplinary Human-Environmental Examination of Effects Consistent with the Anthropocene in the Lower Illinois River Valley","authors":"Carol E. Colaninno, J. Chick, Terrance J. Martin, A. M. Painter, K. B. Brown, Curtis T. Dopson, Ariana O. Enzerink, S. Goesmann, Tom Higgins, Nigel Q. Knutzen, Erin N. Laute, Paula M. Long, Paige L. Ottenfeld, Abigail T. Uehling, L. Ward","doi":"10.1080/01461109.2017.1375067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Using archaeological and ecological data of animal communities, and fish communities in particular, we test for evidence consistent with the Anthropocene in the lower Illinois River valley across millennia. Environmental impacts by preindustrialized peoples may be minor compared to current alterations; however, this hypothesis is untested and should be assessed. Using the relative abundance of fish taxa, we tested for differences among archaeological and modern time periods, taking advantage of published zooarchaeological data sets and newly analyzed data. Collections from all archaeological time periods differed significantly from modern collections, but the relative abundance of fishes did not differ significantly among archaeological time periods. Sociopolitical context, material culture, plant-based subsistence patterns, and the use of animal classes shifted temporally, but these differences did not extend to the relative abundance of fish families. Our results suggest that dominating human influences on fish communities did not occur prior to the Late Woodland period in the lower Illinois River.","PeriodicalId":43225,"journal":{"name":"Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01461109.2017.1375067","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01461109.2017.1375067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using archaeological and ecological data of animal communities, and fish communities in particular, we test for evidence consistent with the Anthropocene in the lower Illinois River valley across millennia. Environmental impacts by preindustrialized peoples may be minor compared to current alterations; however, this hypothesis is untested and should be assessed. Using the relative abundance of fish taxa, we tested for differences among archaeological and modern time periods, taking advantage of published zooarchaeological data sets and newly analyzed data. Collections from all archaeological time periods differed significantly from modern collections, but the relative abundance of fishes did not differ significantly among archaeological time periods. Sociopolitical context, material culture, plant-based subsistence patterns, and the use of animal classes shifted temporally, but these differences did not extend to the relative abundance of fish families. Our results suggest that dominating human influences on fish communities did not occur prior to the Late Woodland period in the lower Illinois River.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下伊利诺伊河流域与人类世一致的跨学科人类-环境影响研究
利用动物群落,特别是鱼类群落的考古和生态数据,我们在伊利诺斯河下游河谷测试了与人类世一致的证据,这些证据跨越了千年。与目前的变化相比,前工业化人民对环境的影响可能很小;然而,这一假设未经检验,应该进行评估。利用鱼类类群的相对丰度,我们利用已发表的动物考古数据集和新分析的数据,测试了考古和现代时期的差异。所有考古时期的标本与现代标本差异显著,但不同考古时期的鱼类相对丰度差异不显著。社会政治背景、物质文化、以植物为基础的生存模式和动物类别的使用都发生了暂时的变化,但这些差异并没有延伸到鱼类的相对丰度。我们的研究结果表明,在伊利诺斯河下游的林地后期之前,人类对鱼类群落的主导影响并没有发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Other Large Bifaces: Late Mississippian Woodworking Tools from Southwestern Indiana The Hodges Site (12MG564) and the Emergence of the Oliver Phase in the White River Valley, Indiana Recognizing Copper Tool Assemblages at Middle Woodland Havana Habitation Sites: Observations on Raw Material Sources, Assemblage Content, and Tool Fabrication Maritime Least Cost Path Analysis: Archaic Travel Routes in the Upper Great Lakes The Precontact Archaeology of the Michigan State University Campus and the Campus Archaeology Program (CAP)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1