Combining Worlds: A Mixed Method for Understanding Learning Spaces

IF 3.8 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Qualitative Methods Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/16094069231173781
Luke McCrone, Martyn Kingsbury
{"title":"Combining Worlds: A Mixed Method for Understanding Learning Spaces","authors":"Luke McCrone, Martyn Kingsbury","doi":"10.1177/16094069231173781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding student interaction in learning spaces is an ongoing challenge. The move away from didactic lecture delivery towards more active and hybrid learning renders this challenge ever more difficult. Researching pedagogic use of informal learning space, which is not formally timetabled or controlled, is always challenging because it is interacted with only transiently by both students and teachers. This paper introduces a mixed methods, phenomenological approach used in recent research to investigate campus learning spaces in face-to-face learning contexts. The full mixed methods approach combined space occupancy monitoring data with naturalistic ethnographic observation, field interviews and, where appropriate, more formal in-depth interviews to provide an effective way of understanding student and teacher engagement with learning spaces. Convergent use of these qualitative and quantitative methods yielded data which informed the application of subsequent methods, and the investment of researcher, pedagogic and infrastructural resource. In this paper we argue that as learning outside of formal teaching spaces increases, these mixed methods enable better, more efficient monitoring of pedagogic use of informal learning spaces. The mixed method can be adapted depending on the question being addressed and has the potential to inform resource allocation and investment into pedagogic and infrastructural change.","PeriodicalId":48220,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231173781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding student interaction in learning spaces is an ongoing challenge. The move away from didactic lecture delivery towards more active and hybrid learning renders this challenge ever more difficult. Researching pedagogic use of informal learning space, which is not formally timetabled or controlled, is always challenging because it is interacted with only transiently by both students and teachers. This paper introduces a mixed methods, phenomenological approach used in recent research to investigate campus learning spaces in face-to-face learning contexts. The full mixed methods approach combined space occupancy monitoring data with naturalistic ethnographic observation, field interviews and, where appropriate, more formal in-depth interviews to provide an effective way of understanding student and teacher engagement with learning spaces. Convergent use of these qualitative and quantitative methods yielded data which informed the application of subsequent methods, and the investment of researcher, pedagogic and infrastructural resource. In this paper we argue that as learning outside of formal teaching spaces increases, these mixed methods enable better, more efficient monitoring of pedagogic use of informal learning spaces. The mixed method can be adapted depending on the question being addressed and has the potential to inform resource allocation and investment into pedagogic and infrastructural change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合世界:理解学习空间的混合方法
理解学生在学习空间中的互动是一个持续的挑战。从说教式的授课转向更加主动和混合的学习,使这一挑战变得更加困难。非正式学习空间没有正式的时间表或控制,研究非正式学习空间的教学使用总是具有挑战性的,因为学生和教师只是短暂地与之互动。本文介绍了一种混合方法,现象学方法在最近的研究中用于调查面对面学习情境下的校园学习空间。完全混合方法将空间占用监测数据与自然的民族志观察、实地访谈以及适当时更正式的深度访谈相结合,以提供一种有效的方式来了解学生和教师对学习空间的参与。这些定性和定量方法的融合使用产生了数据,这些数据为后续方法的应用提供了信息,并为研究人员、教学人员和基础设施资源的投资提供了信息。在本文中,我们认为,随着正规教学空间之外学习的增加,这些混合方法可以更好、更有效地监测非正规学习空间的教学使用。混合方法可以根据所处理的问题进行调整,并有可能为资源分配和对教学和基础设施改革的投资提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
International Journal of Qualitative Methods SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Highlights Impact Factor: 5.4 Ranked 5/110 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary – SSCI Indexed In: Clarivate Analytics: Social Science Citation Index, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Scopus Launched In: 2002 Publication is subject to payment of an article processing charge (APC) Submit here International Journal of Qualitative Methods (IJQM) is a peer-reviewed open access journal which focuses on methodological advances, innovations, and insights in qualitative or mixed methods studies. Please see the Aims and Scope tab for further information.
期刊最新文献
Applying Realist Retroduction to EHR-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool Development. Which Quotations to Use?: Guidance on Selecting and Reporting Quotations in Qualitative Research. "We Have a Ways to Go, but I Think You've Taken the Steps to Get Us There": Engaging Community Partners in Qualitative Analysis Using the RADaR Technique. Risk Environments of Permanent Supportive Housing for Formerly Incarcerated People with Serious Mental Illnesses: A Protocol for a Novel Mixed Methods Feasibility Study. Updating and Advancing Member-Checking Methods: Use of Video and Asynchronous Technology to Optimize Participant Engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1