Storm Surges Versus Shore Erosion: 21 Years (2000–2020) of Observations on the Świna Gate Sandbar (Southern Baltic Coast)

IF 1 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Quaestiones Geographicae Pub Date : 2022-07-09 DOI:10.2478/quageo-2022-0023
T. Łabuz
{"title":"Storm Surges Versus Shore Erosion: 21 Years (2000–2020) of Observations on the Świna Gate Sandbar (Southern Baltic Coast)","authors":"T. Łabuz","doi":"10.2478/quageo-2022-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Based on observations spanning 21 years (2000–2020), the article studies the effects of storm surges on the shore of the Świna Gate Sandbar in the southern part of the Pomeranian Bay (southern Baltic Sea). Impacts of selected maximum storm surges in each year were assessed with respect to morphological data collected on the beach and the foredune. The data included parameters of beach-dune erosion as measured along a beach transect before and after each surge. Differences and trends in the shore erosion were related to the sea level (SL), duration of a storm surge [highest storm sea level (HSL) > 1 m], wind-wave sector and wave run-up. The relationships were explored using a simple correlation analysis. The most serious erosion was observed during the heaviest surges [HSL > 1.3 m above the mean sea level (AMSL)], with a wave run-up higher than 3.2 m AMSL. Such surges occurred at about 2-year intervals. The average SL during a surge was 1.2 m AMSL, with a run-up of 2.6 m AMSL. The beach and the lower part of the shore, below that level, were eroded each year. The heaviest surges resulted in an average 5.2 m and 7.0 m dune retreat on the high-beach-accumulative shore and on the low-beach-erosive shore, respectively. The dune was not eroded when the beach height exceeded the wave run-up. The heaviest surges eroded away 12–14 m3 of the beach sand volume. The shore erosion was found to be related to the storm surge duration, the maximum SL, the run-up and the beach height prior to the surge.","PeriodicalId":46433,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Geographicae","volume":"41 1","pages":"5 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Geographicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2022-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Based on observations spanning 21 years (2000–2020), the article studies the effects of storm surges on the shore of the Świna Gate Sandbar in the southern part of the Pomeranian Bay (southern Baltic Sea). Impacts of selected maximum storm surges in each year were assessed with respect to morphological data collected on the beach and the foredune. The data included parameters of beach-dune erosion as measured along a beach transect before and after each surge. Differences and trends in the shore erosion were related to the sea level (SL), duration of a storm surge [highest storm sea level (HSL) > 1 m], wind-wave sector and wave run-up. The relationships were explored using a simple correlation analysis. The most serious erosion was observed during the heaviest surges [HSL > 1.3 m above the mean sea level (AMSL)], with a wave run-up higher than 3.2 m AMSL. Such surges occurred at about 2-year intervals. The average SL during a surge was 1.2 m AMSL, with a run-up of 2.6 m AMSL. The beach and the lower part of the shore, below that level, were eroded each year. The heaviest surges resulted in an average 5.2 m and 7.0 m dune retreat on the high-beach-accumulative shore and on the low-beach-erosive shore, respectively. The dune was not eroded when the beach height exceeded the wave run-up. The heaviest surges eroded away 12–14 m3 of the beach sand volume. The shore erosion was found to be related to the storm surge duration, the maximum SL, the run-up and the beach height prior to the surge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风暴潮与海岸侵蚀:Świna门沙洲(波罗的海南部海岸)21年(2000-2020年)观测
摘要基于2000-2020年21年的观测资料,研究了风暴潮对波罗的海南部波美拉尼亚湾南部Świna Gate沙洲海岸的影响。根据在海滩和前丘收集的形态数据,评估了每年选定的最大风暴潮的影响。这些数据包括每次浪涌前后沿海滩样带测量的海滩-沙丘侵蚀参数。海岸侵蚀的差异和趋势与海平面(SL)、风暴潮持续时间[最高风暴潮海平面(HSL) >.1 m]、风浪扇形和浪高有关。通过简单的相关分析探讨了两者之间的关系。在浪高最高时[HSL >高于平均海平面1.3 m],浪高超过平均海平面3.2 m时,侵蚀最为严重。这种激增大约每两年发生一次。峰值期间的平均长度为1.2米,峰值为2.6米。海滩和低于这个水平面的海岸下部每年都受到侵蚀。浪涌最大时,高滩积岸和低滩侵蚀岸的沙丘退缩量分别为5.2 m和7.0 m。当滩高超过浪高时,沙丘未被侵蚀。最大的浪涌侵蚀了12-14立方米的海滩沙体积。发现海岸侵蚀与风暴潮持续时间、最大SL、风暴潮前的爬高和海滩高度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Quaestiones Geographicae was established in 1974 as an annual journal of the Institute of Geography, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland. Its founder and first editor was Professor Stefan Kozarski. Initially the scope of the journal covered issues in both physical and socio-economic geography; since 1982, exclusively physical geography. In 2006 there appeared the idea of a return to the original conception of the journal, although in a somewhat modified organisational form. Quaestiones Geographicae publishes research results of wide interest in the following fields: •physical geography, •economic and human geography, •spatial management and planning,
期刊最新文献
Landscape in Change – Place in Uncertainty. A Case Study of Detachment Management of Giant Cell Tumor of the Hyoid bone- A rare Clinical Entity with Review of Literature. Gender-Specific Preferences Regarding Urban Green Areas The Role of a Green Economy in Revitalising Shrinking Cities: Comparative Case Studies in France and Mexico Studying at Higher Education Institutions in Poland as Seen by Students with Disabilities in the Context of the Geographical Model of Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1