Other considerations: Perspective and obligations of our societies and governmental organizations

Bret T. Petersen MD
{"title":"Other considerations: Perspective and obligations of our societies and governmental organizations","authors":"Bret T. Petersen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.tgie.2019.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Recurrent episodes of transmitted infection during gastrointestinal endoscopy have resulted in heightened visibility of the various organizations providing education, guidance, and regulatory oversight for </span>endoscopes<span> and the practice of endoscopy. They include the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state health departments, accrediting organizations, and national medical societies representing practitioners and nurses. The Food and Drug Administration is responsible for ensuring the safety of manufacturer's products, without constraining the availability of critical medical services, such as gastrointestinal endoscopy. Their ongoing oversight of postmarket surveillance studies, and the results of such studies, will significantly influence the expectations for reprocessing in years to come. As a nonregulatory body, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention primarily provides investigational expertise pertaining to infectious outbreaks and guidance to the medical industry regarding best practices, with input from the medical experts in their Hospital Infection Control and Professional Advisory Committee. National societies of nurses, reprocessing professionals, and physicians all provide education and guidance to the field, each with viewpoints ostensibly protective of patients and their membership. The Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, which publishes standards detailing the proper production quality for medical instruments and the procedures in which they are used, is in the midst of rewriting their guidance for reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopes. Despite reservations about process, Advancement of Medical Instrumentation deliberations emphasize the original guidance of the Spaulding Criteria for sterilization of semicritical devices, including endoscopes, when feasible and practicable. This is likely the future state for reprocessing in gastrointestinal endoscopy.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":43887,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tgie.2019.04.007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096288319300312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recurrent episodes of transmitted infection during gastrointestinal endoscopy have resulted in heightened visibility of the various organizations providing education, guidance, and regulatory oversight for endoscopes and the practice of endoscopy. They include the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state health departments, accrediting organizations, and national medical societies representing practitioners and nurses. The Food and Drug Administration is responsible for ensuring the safety of manufacturer's products, without constraining the availability of critical medical services, such as gastrointestinal endoscopy. Their ongoing oversight of postmarket surveillance studies, and the results of such studies, will significantly influence the expectations for reprocessing in years to come. As a nonregulatory body, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention primarily provides investigational expertise pertaining to infectious outbreaks and guidance to the medical industry regarding best practices, with input from the medical experts in their Hospital Infection Control and Professional Advisory Committee. National societies of nurses, reprocessing professionals, and physicians all provide education and guidance to the field, each with viewpoints ostensibly protective of patients and their membership. The Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, which publishes standards detailing the proper production quality for medical instruments and the procedures in which they are used, is in the midst of rewriting their guidance for reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopes. Despite reservations about process, Advancement of Medical Instrumentation deliberations emphasize the original guidance of the Spaulding Criteria for sterilization of semicritical devices, including endoscopes, when feasible and practicable. This is likely the future state for reprocessing in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
其他考虑因素:我们的社会和政府组织的观点和义务
胃肠道内窥镜检查期间传播性感染的反复发作导致各种组织为内窥镜检查和内窥镜检查实践提供教育、指导和监管监督。它们包括食品和药物管理局、疾病控制和预防中心、州卫生部门、认证组织以及代表从业人员和护士的国家医学协会。食品和药物管理局负责确保制造商产品的安全,但不限制关键医疗服务的可用性,如胃肠道内窥镜检查。它们对上市后监督研究的持续监督以及这些研究的结果将对今后几年对再处理的期望产生重大影响。作为一个非监管机构,疾病控制和预防中心主要提供与传染病爆发有关的调查专业知识,并在其医院感染控制和专业咨询委员会的医学专家的投入下,为医疗行业提供有关最佳做法的指导。由护士、再加工专业人员和医生组成的国家协会都为该领域提供教育和指导,每个协会表面上都有保护患者及其会员的观点。医疗器械促进协会(Association for The Advancement of Medical instruments)出版了详细说明医疗器械的适当生产质量及其使用程序的标准,目前正在重写其对胃肠道内窥镜再加工的指导。尽管对流程有所保留,但《医疗器械进展》的审议强调了在可行和可行的情况下,对包括内窥镜在内的半关键设备进行灭菌的斯波尔丁标准的原始指导。这可能是胃肠道内窥镜再处理的未来状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The purpose of each issue of Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is to provide a comprehensive, current overview of a clinical condition or surgical procedure in gastrointestinal endoscopy, combining the effectiveness of an atlas with the timeliness of a journal. Each issue places a vigorous emphasis on diagnosis, rationale for and against a procedure, actual technique, management, and prevention of complications. The journal features abundant illustrations, line drawings and color artwork to guide readers through even the most complicated procedure.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Optimizing flexible endoscope reprocessing Endoscope-associated infections: A brief summary of the current state and views toward the future Other considerations: Perspective and obligations of our societies and governmental organizations Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes: Scientific rationales and patient safety implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1