Women and the squander cycle in food waste in the United Kingdom: An ecofeminist and feminist economic analysis

Q4 Social Sciences Socijalna Ekologija Pub Date : 2021-08-07 DOI:10.17234/SOCEKOL.30.2.3
M. Topić, Audra Diers Lawson, S. Kelsey
{"title":"Women and the squander cycle in food waste in the United Kingdom: An ecofeminist and feminist economic analysis","authors":"M. Topić, Audra Diers Lawson, S. Kelsey","doi":"10.17234/SOCEKOL.30.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the interconnections between gender, class, food security, sustainable food waste, and values. We link feminist economics and ecofeminism in the context of grocery shopping in the United Kingdom. As an environmental and economic issue, food waste is emerging as a global threat, with developed nations grossly contributing to the squander cycle of resources. Such contextualization allows us to both explore the feminist economics perspective, as well as examine routine decision-making by placing it within the larger value system, and connecting it with the sustainability and environmental protection debates. Data were collected on a purchased Smart Survey sample of a UK-wide population, using an approximately 20-minute online questionnaire. A data set of 792 complete responses was included in the analysis. The findings present a dual narrative on grocery shopping. Reduced-priced shopping is often evaluated by women as socially responsible and environmentally friendly. However, women from lower socioeconomic backgrounds demonstrate a resentment towards price-reduced shopping and evaluate it negatively. We argue that these different attitudes reflect relative perceptions of agency and control, which the data suggest are connected to the propensity for food waste and a worsening of the squander cycle.","PeriodicalId":35175,"journal":{"name":"Socijalna Ekologija","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socijalna Ekologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17234/SOCEKOL.30.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the interconnections between gender, class, food security, sustainable food waste, and values. We link feminist economics and ecofeminism in the context of grocery shopping in the United Kingdom. As an environmental and economic issue, food waste is emerging as a global threat, with developed nations grossly contributing to the squander cycle of resources. Such contextualization allows us to both explore the feminist economics perspective, as well as examine routine decision-making by placing it within the larger value system, and connecting it with the sustainability and environmental protection debates. Data were collected on a purchased Smart Survey sample of a UK-wide population, using an approximately 20-minute online questionnaire. A data set of 792 complete responses was included in the analysis. The findings present a dual narrative on grocery shopping. Reduced-priced shopping is often evaluated by women as socially responsible and environmentally friendly. However, women from lower socioeconomic backgrounds demonstrate a resentment towards price-reduced shopping and evaluate it negatively. We argue that these different attitudes reflect relative perceptions of agency and control, which the data suggest are connected to the propensity for food waste and a worsening of the squander cycle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国妇女与食物浪费的浪费循环:生态女性主义和女性主义经济学分析
本文探讨了性别、阶级、粮食安全、可持续粮食浪费和价值观之间的相互联系。我们将女权主义经济学和生态女权主义在英国的杂货店购物的背景下联系起来。作为一个环境和经济问题,食物浪费正在成为一个全球性的威胁,发达国家对资源的浪费循环做出了重大贡献。这样的语境化使我们既可以探索女权主义经济学的视角,也可以通过将常规决策置于更大的价值体系中,并将其与可持续性和环境保护辩论联系起来,来检查常规决策。数据是在英国范围内购买的智能调查样本中收集的,使用大约20分钟的在线问卷。792个完整回复的数据集被纳入分析。调查结果呈现出对杂货店购物的双重叙述。降价购物通常被女性评价为对社会负责和对环境友好。然而,社会经济背景较低的女性对降价购物表现出不满,并对其进行负面评价。我们认为,这些不同的态度反映了对代理和控制的相对看法,数据表明,这与食物浪费的倾向和浪费循环的恶化有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Socijalna Ekologija
Socijalna Ekologija Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Poljoprivrednici sutrašnjice: transformativna snaga kratkih opskrbnih lanaca Geoekološko vrednovanje reljefa Parka prirode Hutovo blato Komuniciranje na Facebooku o obrazovanju za održivi razvoj: primjer odabranih UN fondova i programa u Bosni i Hercegovini Javno mnijenje punoljetnih građana Republike Hrvatske prema pristupima djeci s teškoćama u razvoju Socijalne inovacije u području održivog razvoja u Hrvatskoj
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1