An interactive qualitative analysis of academics’ views of a competency-based undergraduate qualification in risk management

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Qualitative Research in financial Markets Pub Date : 2023-01-25 DOI:10.1108/qrfm-03-2022-0039
J. Marx, Cecilia Jacoba de Swardt
{"title":"An interactive qualitative analysis of academics’ views of a competency-based undergraduate qualification in risk management","authors":"J. Marx, Cecilia Jacoba de Swardt","doi":"10.1108/qrfm-03-2022-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this research was first to determine the competencies mandatory of risk managers, and second, to consider the implications of such competencies in determining modules appropriate for inclusion in any prospective undergraduate qualification with specialisation in risk management.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA qualitative research approach was followed, involving academics teaching risk management in a focus group and making use of interactive qualitative analysis (IQA).\n\n\nFindings\nThe competencies identified were business management skills, financial knowledge, an understanding of the risk management process, governance and compliance, people management and technical skills. These will be explained in greater detail in the paper.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe implications for teaching are that an undergraduate curriculum in risk management will have to combine majors such as business management, financial management, risk management, industrial psychology and communication. These majors need to be complemented by modules in governance and compliance management, as well as information and communication technology.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe implication for practice is that risk management professionals and members of the Institute of Risk Management of South Africa need to avail themselves to serve on an advisory board of academic departments offering risk management qualifications. Risk management is a developing science and requires inputs about research and the curriculation of qualifications.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe implication for public policy is that the South African Qualifications Authority and the Council for Higher Education should reconsider their requirements for designators (specialised qualifications). The implications for research are that IQA provides clarity on the knowledge and skills required to develop a competency-based qualification in risk management. Further research should benchmark qualifications and propose a curriculum for a bachelor’s degree in risk management.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe use of IQA is a novel way of ensuring rigour and objectivity in arriving at a description of the required knowledge, skills, values and attributes of risk managers. This paper will assist in the compilation of a new curriculum for an undergraduate qualification in risk management; thus, ensuring such qualification will provide a competency-based qualification that will meet the needs of the profession.\n","PeriodicalId":45060,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in financial Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-03-2022-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this research was first to determine the competencies mandatory of risk managers, and second, to consider the implications of such competencies in determining modules appropriate for inclusion in any prospective undergraduate qualification with specialisation in risk management. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative research approach was followed, involving academics teaching risk management in a focus group and making use of interactive qualitative analysis (IQA). Findings The competencies identified were business management skills, financial knowledge, an understanding of the risk management process, governance and compliance, people management and technical skills. These will be explained in greater detail in the paper. Research limitations/implications The implications for teaching are that an undergraduate curriculum in risk management will have to combine majors such as business management, financial management, risk management, industrial psychology and communication. These majors need to be complemented by modules in governance and compliance management, as well as information and communication technology. Practical implications The implication for practice is that risk management professionals and members of the Institute of Risk Management of South Africa need to avail themselves to serve on an advisory board of academic departments offering risk management qualifications. Risk management is a developing science and requires inputs about research and the curriculation of qualifications. Social implications The implication for public policy is that the South African Qualifications Authority and the Council for Higher Education should reconsider their requirements for designators (specialised qualifications). The implications for research are that IQA provides clarity on the knowledge and skills required to develop a competency-based qualification in risk management. Further research should benchmark qualifications and propose a curriculum for a bachelor’s degree in risk management. Originality/value The use of IQA is a novel way of ensuring rigour and objectivity in arriving at a description of the required knowledge, skills, values and attributes of risk managers. This paper will assist in the compilation of a new curriculum for an undergraduate qualification in risk management; thus, ensuring such qualification will provide a competency-based qualification that will meet the needs of the profession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术界对基于能力的风险管理本科生资格的看法的互动定性分析
目的本研究的目的首先是确定风险管理人员的强制性能力,其次是在确定适合纳入任何未来的风险管理专业本科生资格的模块时考虑这些能力的影响。设计/方法论/方法采用了定性研究方法,包括学者在焦点小组中教授风险管理,并使用交互式定性分析(IQA)。发现确定的能力包括业务管理技能、财务知识、对风险管理流程的理解、治理和合规、人员管理和技术技能。这些将在本文中进行更详细的解释。研究局限性/含义对教学的影响是,风险管理本科课程必须结合商业管理、财务管理、风险管理、工业心理学和传播学等专业。这些专业需要辅以治理和合规管理以及信息和通信技术模块。实际含义对实践的含义是,风险管理专业人员和南非风险管理研究所的成员需要在提供风险管理资格的学术部门的咨询委员会中任职。风险管理是一门发展中的科学,需要有关研究和资格课程的投入。社会影响对公共政策的影响是,南非资格认证局和高等教育委员会应重新考虑其对指定人员(专业资格)的要求。研究的意义在于,IQA明确了在风险管理中发展基于能力的资格所需的知识和技能。进一步的研究应该以资格为基准,并提出风险管理学士学位的课程。独创性/价值IQA的使用是一种新颖的方式,可以确保对风险经理所需知识、技能、价值观和属性的描述的严谨性和客观性。这篇论文将有助于编制风险管理本科生资格证书的新课程;因此,确保这种资格将提供一种基于能力的资格,以满足职业需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research in Financial Markets is the only peer-reviewed journal dedicated to exploring the rapidly-growing area of research activity in finance that uses qualitative methods. Building on a long pedigree of finance research, the journal publishes international and innovative analyses and novel insights into financial markets worldwide
期刊最新文献
Internal Shariah audit change: an identification of specific Islamic legal maxim in Islamic banking institution Role of policyholders’ beliefs in life insurance lapses: a model building approach Exploring the potential impact of big data on the collection of sufficient, appropriate audit evidence: insights from auditors in the UAE Determinants inhibiting digital payment system adoption: an Indian perspective Debt advice in Europe: a search of the good practices to fight over-indebtedness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1