Analyzing the approach and treatment applied by Endocrinology- and Metabology-expert physicians to patients living with excess weight

José Victor Fecuri Lopardi, Samuel Henriques Tenório Seco, Lucas Monteiro de Oliveira, D. Guedes Andrade Ezequiel, Fernando Antônio Basile Colugnati, Lize Vargas Ferreira, Alberto Da Silva Dias Filho, Christianne Toledo de Souza Leal
{"title":"Analyzing the approach and treatment applied by Endocrinology- and Metabology-expert physicians to patients living with excess weight","authors":"José Victor Fecuri Lopardi, Samuel Henriques Tenório Seco, Lucas Monteiro de Oliveira, D. Guedes Andrade Ezequiel, Fernando Antônio Basile Colugnati, Lize Vargas Ferreira, Alberto Da Silva Dias Filho, Christianne Toledo de Souza Leal","doi":"10.34019/1982-8047.2022.v48.36234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Body weight increase is a contemporary trend that leads to health issues in the world’s population. Social stigma associated with this patient profile has negative repercussions, mainly in physician-patient interactions, which can result in weight gain and in increased mortality rates. Thus, the management of this worldwide disease requires a better understanding of its multiple aspects, as recommended by international guidelines.  Purpose: The aim of the current study was to analyze some aspects of the therapeutic approach adopted by Endocrinology and Metabology-expert physicians to treat patients living with excess weight, based on information available in current guidelines. Methodology: Observational, cross-sectional study conducted with convenience sample deriving from the scientific update group “EndoNews”, which is hosted in online platform. Data were collected through structured questionnaire completed by 246 participants. Similar responses were grouped and subjected to Chi-square tests, at 5% Alpha. Results: 72% of physicians reported to have additional difficulties to treat this patient profile (PWD). PWD reports were mostly associated with work environments described as ill-equipped (p-value = 0.009), with the Northern and Northeastern macroregions (p-Value = 0.012), with weak belief in long-term therapeutic success (p-value = 0.004) and with approach self-reported as less encouraging (p-value = 0.001). Other variables presenting statistical significance were also reported. Conclusion: It was possible drawing different profiles for physicians with (PWD) and without difficulty (PND) to treat patients living with excess weight. Factors, such as region of practice and ill-equipped infrastructure, were predictive of such a difficulty. Moreover, certain factors used to analyze participants’ agreement with guidelines have shown that PWD diverged more often from the recommended information. Therefore, reflections on language, strategies and infrastructural preparedness to serve these patients were suggested, aiming at subsequent changes in physicians’ attitude towards their treatment.","PeriodicalId":34488,"journal":{"name":"HU Revista","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HU Revista","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-8047.2022.v48.36234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Body weight increase is a contemporary trend that leads to health issues in the world’s population. Social stigma associated with this patient profile has negative repercussions, mainly in physician-patient interactions, which can result in weight gain and in increased mortality rates. Thus, the management of this worldwide disease requires a better understanding of its multiple aspects, as recommended by international guidelines.  Purpose: The aim of the current study was to analyze some aspects of the therapeutic approach adopted by Endocrinology and Metabology-expert physicians to treat patients living with excess weight, based on information available in current guidelines. Methodology: Observational, cross-sectional study conducted with convenience sample deriving from the scientific update group “EndoNews”, which is hosted in online platform. Data were collected through structured questionnaire completed by 246 participants. Similar responses were grouped and subjected to Chi-square tests, at 5% Alpha. Results: 72% of physicians reported to have additional difficulties to treat this patient profile (PWD). PWD reports were mostly associated with work environments described as ill-equipped (p-value = 0.009), with the Northern and Northeastern macroregions (p-Value = 0.012), with weak belief in long-term therapeutic success (p-value = 0.004) and with approach self-reported as less encouraging (p-value = 0.001). Other variables presenting statistical significance were also reported. Conclusion: It was possible drawing different profiles for physicians with (PWD) and without difficulty (PND) to treat patients living with excess weight. Factors, such as region of practice and ill-equipped infrastructure, were predictive of such a difficulty. Moreover, certain factors used to analyze participants’ agreement with guidelines have shown that PWD diverged more often from the recommended information. Therefore, reflections on language, strategies and infrastructural preparedness to serve these patients were suggested, aiming at subsequent changes in physicians’ attitude towards their treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内分泌学和代谢学专家医师对超重患者的治疗方法分析
引言:体重增加是导致世界人口健康问题的当代趋势。与这种患者状况相关的社会污名具有负面影响,主要是在医患互动中,这可能导致体重增加和死亡率增加。因此,按照国际指南的建议,管理这种世界性疾病需要更好地了解其多个方面。目的:本研究的目的是根据当前指南中提供的信息,分析内分泌和代谢专家医生治疗超重患者所采用的治疗方法的某些方面。方法:使用来自在线平台上托管的科学更新小组“EndoNews”的方便样本进行观察性横断面研究。数据是通过246名参与者完成的结构化问卷收集的。将类似的反应分组,并在5%Alpha下进行卡方检验。结果:72%的医生报告说,在治疗这种患者档案(PWD)方面有额外的困难。PWD报告主要与设备不良的工作环境(p值=0.009)、北部和东北部大区(p值0.012)、对长期治疗成功的信心不足(p值0.004)和自我报告不太令人鼓舞的方法(p值0.001)有关。还报告了其他具有统计学意义的变量。结论:对于患有(PWD)和无困难(PND)的医生治疗超重患者,可以绘制不同的图谱。实践地区和设备简陋的基础设施等因素预示着这种困难。此外,用于分析参与者对指南的一致性的某些因素表明,PWD更经常偏离推荐信息。因此,建议对为这些患者服务的语言、策略和基础设施准备进行反思,以期随后改变医生对他们治疗的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Aspectos clínicos e diagnósticos, qualidade de vida, utilidade, adesão terapêutica e custos para angioedema hereditário associado à deficiência de C1-esterase Avaliação da eficácia e segurança de pegaspargase, em comparação à L-asparaginase, e sua viabilidade econômica no tratamento de leucemia linfoblástica aguda Suporte básico de vida para estudantes de escolas públicas e privadas durante a pandemia do SARS-CoV-2 Vírus Epstein-Barr associado ao Linfoma de Hodgkin clássico: um estudo de casos Associação do risco nutricional com parâmetros clínicos e nutricionais de pacientes internados em um hospital universitário
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1