{"title":"Security, Conflict Management, and Peacebuilding: Formal Education in Intrastate Political Agreements, 1989–2016","authors":"Giuditta Fontana","doi":"10.17763/1943-5045-93.2.173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this mixed methods analysis of a dataset she developed, Giuditta Fontana explores how formal intrastate peace processes have addressed reforms of for mal education since the end of the Cold War. Looking at the frequency of reforms of formal education, the con text for their inclusion, and the framing of their aims, she finds that intrastate political agreements circumscribe the peace building potential of education because they rarely include education as a component, their geopolitical context and broader content are not clearly associated with the inclusion of education reforms, and education reforms are primarily framed as contributing to security and conflict management rather than long-term peace building. With fundamental implications for scholarship and policy, this article shows that peace agreements’ focus on the promotion of negative peace rather than more ambitious positive peace is an obstacle to realizing the peacebuilding potential of education in conflict-affected contexts.","PeriodicalId":48207,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Educational Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-93.2.173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this mixed methods analysis of a dataset she developed, Giuditta Fontana explores how formal intrastate peace processes have addressed reforms of for mal education since the end of the Cold War. Looking at the frequency of reforms of formal education, the con text for their inclusion, and the framing of their aims, she finds that intrastate political agreements circumscribe the peace building potential of education because they rarely include education as a component, their geopolitical context and broader content are not clearly associated with the inclusion of education reforms, and education reforms are primarily framed as contributing to security and conflict management rather than long-term peace building. With fundamental implications for scholarship and policy, this article shows that peace agreements’ focus on the promotion of negative peace rather than more ambitious positive peace is an obstacle to realizing the peacebuilding potential of education in conflict-affected contexts.
期刊介绍:
The Harvard Educational Review (HER) accepts contributions from researchers, scholars, policy makers, practitioners, teachers, students, and informed observers in education and related fields. In addition to original reports of research and theory, HER welcomes articles that reflect on teaching and practice in educational settings in the United States and abroad.