Heritage Industry, or Lithuanian Notions of the Manor in the 21st Century

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.15388/lis.2022.50.7
Salvijus Kulevičius
{"title":"Heritage Industry, or Lithuanian Notions of the Manor in the 21st Century","authors":"Salvijus Kulevičius","doi":"10.15388/lis.2022.50.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, the notion of a manor was basically unequivocal in the Lithuanian society – it was related to Polish influence (which means it is not ours, Lithuanian). This was the result of political and cultural conflicts between the two nations, a struggle for the power of expression of great narratives and historical memory. The manor with its history and heritage was depicted in negative or at least gloomy colors. Such notions dominated in the consciousness of Lithuanians almost during the whole 20th century. In the second half of the 1980s, the first seeds of alternative or novel notions of the manor emerged in Lithuania. In about 2000, the business discourse appropriated manor culture to create their own notion as developers of products and services for consumers. This paper presents the genesis of this notion, its peculiarities, expressions, and interactions with Lithuanian identity and historical memory.One of the conclusions of the research is that around 2010, a fundamental turning point occurred in the concept and notion of Lithuanian manors, as they came to be associated with native Lithuanian culture and identity – associated, yet not unconditionally accepted. The new role of the manor presents an interesting phenomenon. Manor culture is perceived as attractive because of its different, exotic, and unknown culture.","PeriodicalId":33054,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/lis.2022.50.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For decades, the notion of a manor was basically unequivocal in the Lithuanian society – it was related to Polish influence (which means it is not ours, Lithuanian). This was the result of political and cultural conflicts between the two nations, a struggle for the power of expression of great narratives and historical memory. The manor with its history and heritage was depicted in negative or at least gloomy colors. Such notions dominated in the consciousness of Lithuanians almost during the whole 20th century. In the second half of the 1980s, the first seeds of alternative or novel notions of the manor emerged in Lithuania. In about 2000, the business discourse appropriated manor culture to create their own notion as developers of products and services for consumers. This paper presents the genesis of this notion, its peculiarities, expressions, and interactions with Lithuanian identity and historical memory.One of the conclusions of the research is that around 2010, a fundamental turning point occurred in the concept and notion of Lithuanian manors, as they came to be associated with native Lithuanian culture and identity – associated, yet not unconditionally accepted. The new role of the manor presents an interesting phenomenon. Manor culture is perceived as attractive because of its different, exotic, and unknown culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗产产业,或21世纪立陶宛庄园观念
几十年来,庄园的概念在立陶宛社会中基本上是明确的——它与波兰的影响有关(立陶宛人,这意味着它不是我们的)。这是两国之间政治和文化冲突的结果,是为了争夺伟大叙事和历史记忆的表达力量。庄园及其历史和遗产被描绘成负面的或至少是悲观的色彩。这种观念几乎在整个20世纪都在立陶宛人的意识中占据主导地位。20世纪80年代后半叶,立陶宛出现了庄园另类或新颖概念的第一批种子。大约在2000年,商业话语利用庄园文化创造了自己的概念,即为消费者开发产品和服务。本文介绍了这一概念的起源、特点、表达方式以及与立陶宛人身份和历史记忆的互动。该研究的结论之一是,在2010年左右,立陶宛庄园的概念和概念出现了一个根本性的转折点,因为它们与立陶宛本土文化和身份联系在一起——相关但并非无条件接受。庄园的新角色呈现了一个有趣的现象。庄园文化因其与众不同、充满异国情调和不为人知的文化而被视为具有吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Kada Lietuvoje atsirado nedarbas? The Summer Seminar of Vilnius Symposium in the Faculty of History The National Symbols of Lithuania: the inherited or "invented" Traditions The Book about Constituent Assembly of Lithuania - ,,Steigiamajam Seimui - 90" - Rec.: Steigiamajam Seimui - 90 / sud. S. Kaubrys, A. Vyšniauskas (Lietuvos valstybingumo paveldas. T. l), Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2011. 251 p. The use of the Ruthenian Languague in Ecclesiastical Books and its Relations to the Religious Identities in the Ruthenian Lands of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the 14 - 18th Centuries: the Protestant and Uniat Traditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1