Sampling performance of bait traps in high Andean fruit-feeding butterflies

IF 0.9 Q4 ECOLOGY Neotropical Biodiversity Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23766808.2021.2004802
C. F. Álvarez, Alejandra Clavijo-Giraldo, Sandra Inés Uribe, T. Pyrcz, C. A. Iserhard, André Victor Lucci Freitas, M. Marín
{"title":"Sampling performance of bait traps in high Andean fruit-feeding butterflies","authors":"C. F. Álvarez, Alejandra Clavijo-Giraldo, Sandra Inés Uribe, T. Pyrcz, C. A. Iserhard, André Victor Lucci Freitas, M. Marín","doi":"10.1080/23766808.2021.2004802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Studies on model organisms such as butterflies are useful tools for conservation decision-making. However, in tropical ecosystems with an intrinsic high diversity a full understanding of biotic communities is difficult to obtain. Bait trap samplings have traditionally been used for community appraisals related to ecological and conservation issues. Nonetheless, in the Andes Mountains, there is little knowledge related to the effectiveness of bait traps for butterfly sampling. In this study, we tested the success of fermented fruits and rotten fish baits for butterfly sampling in four land-cover types (páramo, cloud forests, mixed, and pasture) in the upper Rio Chico basin of the northern Central Cordillera of the Colombian Andes. A butterfly survey was conducted between 2011 and 2014, in an elevation range of 2650 to 3300 masl, within a total of 132 field days. Three sampling units for each land cover were established with four standard Van Someren-Rydon traps (VSR) per sampling unit. Traps were baited alternatively with fermented fruits and carrion (rotten fish). All 57 recorded species were captured using rotten fish, while approximately 65% (37 species) were collected from fermented fruit. Moreover, species richness was higher in all sampled land covers using rotten fish bait, but the dominant species in the land covers differed between baits. The rotten fish bait proved to be highly effective for butterfly sampling in páramo and cloud forest, although the combination of traps baited with fermented banana and rotten fish, allowed the collection of data suitable for comparison among all studied land cover.","PeriodicalId":36863,"journal":{"name":"Neotropical Biodiversity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neotropical Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2021.2004802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Studies on model organisms such as butterflies are useful tools for conservation decision-making. However, in tropical ecosystems with an intrinsic high diversity a full understanding of biotic communities is difficult to obtain. Bait trap samplings have traditionally been used for community appraisals related to ecological and conservation issues. Nonetheless, in the Andes Mountains, there is little knowledge related to the effectiveness of bait traps for butterfly sampling. In this study, we tested the success of fermented fruits and rotten fish baits for butterfly sampling in four land-cover types (páramo, cloud forests, mixed, and pasture) in the upper Rio Chico basin of the northern Central Cordillera of the Colombian Andes. A butterfly survey was conducted between 2011 and 2014, in an elevation range of 2650 to 3300 masl, within a total of 132 field days. Three sampling units for each land cover were established with four standard Van Someren-Rydon traps (VSR) per sampling unit. Traps were baited alternatively with fermented fruits and carrion (rotten fish). All 57 recorded species were captured using rotten fish, while approximately 65% (37 species) were collected from fermented fruit. Moreover, species richness was higher in all sampled land covers using rotten fish bait, but the dominant species in the land covers differed between baits. The rotten fish bait proved to be highly effective for butterfly sampling in páramo and cloud forest, although the combination of traps baited with fermented banana and rotten fish, allowed the collection of data suitable for comparison among all studied land cover.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高安第斯山脉食果蝴蝶诱饵器取样性能
蝴蝶等模式生物的研究是保护决策的有效工具。然而,在具有内在高度多样性的热带生态系统中,很难获得对生物群落的充分了解。传统上,诱捕饵器取样用于与生态和保护问题有关的社区评估。然而,在安第斯山脉,关于蝴蝶取样的诱饵陷阱的有效性的知识很少。在这项研究中,我们测试了发酵水果和腐烂鱼饵在四种土地覆盖类型(páramo、云雾林、混合和牧场)中蝴蝶取样的成功率。2011年至2014年期间,在海拔2650至3300米的范围内进行了蝴蝶调查,共进行了132天的野外调查。为每个土地覆盖建立了3个采样单元,每个采样单元使用4个标准Van Someren-Rydon陷阱(VSR)。诱捕器交替使用发酵水果和腐肉(腐烂的鱼)作为诱饵。所有记录的57种均采用腐鱼捕获,而发酵水果捕获约65%(37种)。腐鱼饵料对不同饵料土地覆被的物种丰富度影响较大,但不同饵料土地覆被的优势物种存在差异。在páramo和云雾森林中,腐烂的鱼饵被证明是非常有效的蝴蝶采样方法,尽管用发酵香蕉和腐烂的鱼作为诱饵的陷阱组合,可以收集到适合于所有研究土地覆盖之间比较的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neotropical Biodiversity
Neotropical Biodiversity Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Caracterización de poblaciones de especies endémicas en bosque tropical seco semideciduo. Parque Nacional Machalilla, Manabí, Ecuador Morphoanatomical leaf traits of herbaceous species raised in a cronosequence of naturally regenerated areas of tropical deciduous forest Hospederos y patrones de prevalencia de parásitos aviares Philornis (Diptera: muscidae) en la costa de Ecuador Vulnerability of elevation-restricted endemic birds of the Cordillera de Talamanca (Costa Rica and Panama) to climate change Reproductive events of birds from Southern Ecuador
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1