‘At the end of the course, where is their progression’? The paradox of progression for former so-called not in education, employment, and training youth

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Power and Education Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1177/17577438231200350
Carlene Cornish
{"title":"‘At the end of the course, where is their progression’? The paradox of progression for former so-called not in education, employment, and training youth","authors":"Carlene Cornish","doi":"10.1177/17577438231200350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is often presumed that when students complete a particular entry course at college, the acquisition of that qualification should grant access to the next, higher level of study. There is a dearth of academic research on the actual progression outcomes for so-called not in education, employment, and training (NEET) and disengaged youth, enrolled on an employability course. Purportedly, the employability qualifications should enable students to progress towards higher levels of study, but do they? Adopting a case study approach, research was conducted with seven tutors and 26 students enrolled on the 2013 and 2014 Level 1 Achieving Skills Course, an employability course delivered at The Site, a FE college in the East Region. The college’s database was also accessed to review success and progression outcomes. Highlighting discrepancy and controversy, key findings revealed that most participants were unable to progress onto higher level courses at The Site. Instead, they were recorded as either NEET or destination unknown. This paper reveals key factors impeding progression and the reification of NEET identities on this course. It calls for political debate and a sharper inspection into the quality of re-engagement provisions for so-called NEET and disengaged youth.","PeriodicalId":37109,"journal":{"name":"Power and Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438231200350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is often presumed that when students complete a particular entry course at college, the acquisition of that qualification should grant access to the next, higher level of study. There is a dearth of academic research on the actual progression outcomes for so-called not in education, employment, and training (NEET) and disengaged youth, enrolled on an employability course. Purportedly, the employability qualifications should enable students to progress towards higher levels of study, but do they? Adopting a case study approach, research was conducted with seven tutors and 26 students enrolled on the 2013 and 2014 Level 1 Achieving Skills Course, an employability course delivered at The Site, a FE college in the East Region. The college’s database was also accessed to review success and progression outcomes. Highlighting discrepancy and controversy, key findings revealed that most participants were unable to progress onto higher level courses at The Site. Instead, they were recorded as either NEET or destination unknown. This paper reveals key factors impeding progression and the reification of NEET identities on this course. It calls for political debate and a sharper inspection into the quality of re-engagement provisions for so-called NEET and disengaged youth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“课程结束时,他们的进步在哪里?”?前所谓非教育、就业和培训青年的进步悖论
人们通常认为,当学生在大学完成一门特定的入门课程时,获得该资格应该可以进入下一个更高水平的学习。缺乏关于所谓的非教育、就业和培训(NEET)和参加就业能力课程的空闲青年的实际进步结果的学术研究。有意地说,就业资格应该使学生能够向更高的学习水平迈进,但他们是这样吗?采用案例研究的方法,对7名导师和26名参加2013年和2014年1级成就技能课程的学生进行了研究,这是一门在东部地区FE学院the Site开设的就业能力课程。该学院的数据库也被访问,以审查成功和进步的结果。主要调查结果显示,大多数参与者无法在网站上学习更高水平的课程,这突出了差异和争议。相反,它们被记录为NEET或目的地未知。本文揭示了阻碍NEET身份在该课程中发展和具体化的关键因素。它呼吁进行政治辩论,并对所谓的NEET和脱离社会的青年的重新参与条款的质量进行更深入的检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Power and Education
Power and Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Navigating classroom challenges and curriculum changes: A qualitative study of an English Teacher’s journey in the Indonesian education system Exploring the mediating role of teacher expectation on whole class participation The role of music in supporting young children’s holistic learning and wellbeing in the context of Froebel’s mother songs Debates in digital pedagogy within prisons Epistemic injustice and unwellness in the classroom: Creating knowledge like we matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1