Twenty Reasons Why Cross-Curricular Citizenship Education Might Struggle to Take Flight in Secondary Schools: An Autoethnographic Review

Q4 Social Sciences Curriculum and Teaching Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.7459/ct/37.1.02
P. Brett
{"title":"Twenty Reasons Why Cross-Curricular Citizenship Education Might Struggle to Take Flight in Secondary Schools: An Autoethnographic Review","authors":"P. Brett","doi":"10.7459/ct/37.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper combines an autoethnographic approach with a literature review of general and discipline-specific research linked to the theme of cross-curricular citizenship education (“CE”) from the 1990s to the present. It identifies 20 reasons why cross-curricular CE struggles\n to take flight in secondary schools. These reasons are organized into four categories: structural, epistemological, attitudinal and pedagogical. While the focus is mainly upon citizenship education in England (and, to a lesser extent, in Australia), the paper suggests that the barriers identified\n exist in most nations.","PeriodicalId":35186,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum and Teaching","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/37.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper combines an autoethnographic approach with a literature review of general and discipline-specific research linked to the theme of cross-curricular citizenship education (“CE”) from the 1990s to the present. It identifies 20 reasons why cross-curricular CE struggles to take flight in secondary schools. These reasons are organized into four categories: structural, epistemological, attitudinal and pedagogical. While the focus is mainly upon citizenship education in England (and, to a lesser extent, in Australia), the paper suggests that the barriers identified exist in most nations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨学科公民教育在中学难以起飞的20个原因:一篇民族志综述
本文将民族志方法与文献综述相结合,回顾了从20世纪90年代到现在与跨课程公民教育(“CE”)主题相关的一般和学科研究。它确定了跨课程CE在中学难以逃学的20个原因。这些原因可分为四类:结构原因、认识原因、态度原因和教学原因。虽然重点主要放在英国(以及澳大利亚)的公民教育上,但该论文表明,大多数国家都存在已发现的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum and Teaching
Curriculum and Teaching Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Curriculum and Teaching, first published in 1985, is an established, refereed international journal publishing original research from throughout the world which deals with major up-to-date issues and trends in curriculum theory and practice. The journal uses a balanced and comparative perspective to consider curriculum design and development, evaluation, curriculum models, comparative studies in curriculum, innovation and policy, planning, and educational administration. The journal’s object is to advance the study and development of curriculum and teaching, with a view to improving teaching and pedagogy. Curriculum and Teaching provides an impartial forum for scholars throughout the world, working in the area of curriculum studies. Curriculum and Teaching is double blind peer reviewed. The journal has no publication fees.
期刊最新文献
Combined Teaching Strategies as an Attitude Changing Tool Towards Inclusive Education Quality Education in Schools Outcomes-Based Teaching and Learning Assessment Instrument for Teachers in Higher Education Curriculum Management in Higher Education: An Analysis Using the Four Frames Model Student Performance in Different Modes of Online and In-person Assessments and Impact on Academic Integrity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1