Research issues of the top 100 cited articles on information literacy in higher education published from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2022-11-26 DOI:10.14742/ajet.7695
C. Chen, Ningning Wang, Kai-Yu Tang, Y. Tu
{"title":"Research issues of the top 100 cited articles on information literacy in higher education published from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis","authors":"C. Chen, Ningning Wang, Kai-Yu Tang, Y. Tu","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information literacy is a core research topic in the field of library and information science. The developmental context of this field can be examined through a long-term retrospective analysis of relevant literature. This study explored the research trends and potential research issues in the top 100 most frequently cited articles on information literacy in higher education published from 2011 to 2020. In addition to a systematic review, this study employed bibliometric methods, including co-citation network analysis, to identify four main research streams in the field of information literacy in higher education: (a) the relationships among students’ information literacy beliefs, competencies, attitudes and behaviour; (b) teachers’, librarians’ and students’ perspectives on information literacy; (c) the relationship between students’ information literacy and epistemic beliefs; and (d) the web search behaviour of digital natives. Accordingly, potential directions for future research and practitioner notes related to information literacy in higher education are proposed herein as a reference for researchers, teachers and policymakers.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nFor administrators of higher educational institutions, understanding the challenges of new digital technologies and providing training to develop information literacy skills are crucial.\nFor teachers, designing teaching materials and pedagogy based on the latest information literacy standards and framework is useful.\nCollaboration with professionals from different disciplines is also useful for teachers to integrate information literacy into subject learning activities to cultivate the information literacy competencies of students.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Information literacy is a core research topic in the field of library and information science. The developmental context of this field can be examined through a long-term retrospective analysis of relevant literature. This study explored the research trends and potential research issues in the top 100 most frequently cited articles on information literacy in higher education published from 2011 to 2020. In addition to a systematic review, this study employed bibliometric methods, including co-citation network analysis, to identify four main research streams in the field of information literacy in higher education: (a) the relationships among students’ information literacy beliefs, competencies, attitudes and behaviour; (b) teachers’, librarians’ and students’ perspectives on information literacy; (c) the relationship between students’ information literacy and epistemic beliefs; and (d) the web search behaviour of digital natives. Accordingly, potential directions for future research and practitioner notes related to information literacy in higher education are proposed herein as a reference for researchers, teachers and policymakers. Implications for practice or policy: For administrators of higher educational institutions, understanding the challenges of new digital technologies and providing training to develop information literacy skills are crucial. For teachers, designing teaching materials and pedagogy based on the latest information literacy standards and framework is useful. Collaboration with professionals from different disciplines is also useful for teachers to integrate information literacy into subject learning activities to cultivate the information literacy competencies of students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2011 - 2020年高等教育信息素养被引前100篇论文研究问题:系统综述与共被引网络分析
信息素养是图书馆情报学领域的一个核心研究课题。这一领域的发展背景可以通过对相关文献的长期回顾性分析来检验。本研究探讨了2011 - 2020年发表的高等教育信息素养被引频次前100篇论文的研究趋势和潜在研究问题。除了系统回顾外,本研究还采用文献计量学方法,包括共被引网络分析,确定了高等教育信息素养领域的四个主要研究方向:(a)学生信息素养信念、能力、态度和行为之间的关系;(b)教师、图书馆员和学生对信息素养的看法;(c)学生信息素养与认知信念的关系;(d)数字原生代的网络搜索行为。据此,本文提出了高等教育信息素养相关的未来研究方向和实践者注意事项,供研究者、教师和政策制定者参考。对实践或政策的影响:对于高等教育机构的管理者来说,理解新数字技术的挑战并提供培训以发展信息素养技能至关重要。对于教师来说,根据最新的信息素养标准和框架来设计教材和教学方法是有用的。与不同学科的专业人士合作也有助于教师将信息素养融入学科学习活动,培养学生的信息素养能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Academics' perceptions of ChatGPT-generated written outputs: A practical application of Turing’s Imitation Game Effects of a ChatGPT-based flipped learning guiding approach on learners’ courseware project performances and perceptions University teachers’ well-being in ICT-enhanced teaching: The roles of teacher self-efficacy and teaching support Digital transformation in engineering education: Exploring the potential of AI-assisted learning Investigation of student experiences with ChatGPT-supported online learning applications in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1