Queer times in Moonlight

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION New Review of Film and Television Studies Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/17400309.2023.2206391
M. Stekl
{"title":"Queer times in Moonlight","authors":"M. Stekl","doi":"10.1080/17400309.2023.2206391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The time is out of joint in Moonlight (2016). While Barry Jenkins’ film appears to divide Chiron’s life into three chronological periods, each stage both repeats and anticipates something of the others, on the levels of both form and content – from the recurrence of heteronormative, antiBlack violence throughout Chiron’s life to the reprisal of the police-like flashes of light that cinematographically periodize his story, this narrative is (un)structured by repetition. This essay asks how Moonlight’s reiterative temporality might intervene in the ‘temporal turn’ in queer studies. By emphasizing the structuring repetition of antiBlackness, I want to complicate the utopian aspirations of queer futurism, in the vein of José Esteban Muñoz, as well as the psychoanalytic elision of race that defines queer anti-futurism, or the ‘anti-social thesis’, after Lee Edelman. What is the (non)place of Blackness in romances of queer futurity? In romances of queer negativity? In conversation with prior queer and Black scholarship on Moonlight, I argue that the film stages Blackness as a disruption to both straight and queer temporalities as we know them. Ultimately, I suggest that the film posits a third way out of the futurism/anti-futurism deadlock in queer studies: the iterability that (de)constructs Black(ness)’s narrative gestures toward an absolute open(ended)ness which is unrealizable as futurity and which is inextricable from the endlessly reiterated antiBlack, antiqueer violence of the modern world.","PeriodicalId":43549,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"338 - 362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2023.2206391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The time is out of joint in Moonlight (2016). While Barry Jenkins’ film appears to divide Chiron’s life into three chronological periods, each stage both repeats and anticipates something of the others, on the levels of both form and content – from the recurrence of heteronormative, antiBlack violence throughout Chiron’s life to the reprisal of the police-like flashes of light that cinematographically periodize his story, this narrative is (un)structured by repetition. This essay asks how Moonlight’s reiterative temporality might intervene in the ‘temporal turn’ in queer studies. By emphasizing the structuring repetition of antiBlackness, I want to complicate the utopian aspirations of queer futurism, in the vein of José Esteban Muñoz, as well as the psychoanalytic elision of race that defines queer anti-futurism, or the ‘anti-social thesis’, after Lee Edelman. What is the (non)place of Blackness in romances of queer futurity? In romances of queer negativity? In conversation with prior queer and Black scholarship on Moonlight, I argue that the film stages Blackness as a disruption to both straight and queer temporalities as we know them. Ultimately, I suggest that the film posits a third way out of the futurism/anti-futurism deadlock in queer studies: the iterability that (de)constructs Black(ness)’s narrative gestures toward an absolute open(ended)ness which is unrealizable as futurity and which is inextricable from the endlessly reiterated antiBlack, antiqueer violence of the modern world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
月光下的酷儿时光
《月光男孩》(2016)讲述了一个时间错位的故事。巴里·詹金斯(Barry Jenkins)的电影似乎将凯龙的生活分成了三个时间顺序,每个阶段在形式和内容上都重复和期待着其他阶段的一些事情——从贯穿凯龙一生的异性恋规范、反黑人暴力的反复出现,到像警察一样的闪光的报复,这些闪光在电影中分期化了他的故事,这种叙事(非)由重复构成。本文探讨了《月光男孩》的重复性时间性如何介入酷儿研究中的“时间转向”。通过强调反黑人的结构重复,我想把酷儿未来主义的乌托邦愿望复杂化,在jos Esteban Muñoz的脉络中,以及在李·埃德尔曼(Lee Edelman)之后定义酷儿反未来主义或“反社会论题”的精神分析中对种族的忽略。黑人在关于酷儿未来的浪漫小说中的(非)地位是什么?在酷儿的消极浪漫中?在与之前关于《月光男孩》的酷儿和黑人学者的谈话中,我认为这部电影将黑人作为对我们所知道的异性恋和酷儿暂时性的破坏。最后,我认为这部电影为酷儿研究中未来主义/反未来主义的僵局提供了第三条出路:建构黑人(本质)的叙事姿态的可迭代性,指向一种绝对开放(结束)的本质,这种本质作为未来是无法实现的,它与现代世界不断重申的反黑人、反酷儿暴力密不可分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
The Australian film revival: 1970s, 1980s, and beyond Transformational ethics of film: thinking the cinemakeover in the film-philosophy debate A note of introduction Starmaker: David O. Selznick and the production of stars in the Hollywood studio system Mediating the elemental: an immaterialist ethics for ecomaterialist media theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1