‘If we Can’t Have a Conversation with our Past, then What will be Our Future?’: HIV/AIDS, Queer Generationalism, and Utopian Performatives in Matthew Lopez’s The Inheritance

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE ENGLISH Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1093/english/efaa014
L. Hann
{"title":"‘If we Can’t Have a Conversation with our Past, then What will be Our Future?’: HIV/AIDS, Queer Generationalism, and Utopian Performatives in Matthew Lopez’s The Inheritance","authors":"L. Hann","doi":"10.1093/english/efaa014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As the HIV/AIDS epidemic approaches its fifth decade, and emerging generations of queer-identified youth experience and conceptualize the virus in new ways, questions surrounding the memorialization and historicization of queer history have arisen within the arts. In the domain of theatre in particular, as mainstream revivals of crisis-era plays such as Larry Kramer’s The Normal Heart (1985) and Tony Kushner’s Angels in America (1991) proliferate, criticisms have arisen that such revivals feed into a narrative of the so-called ‘AIDS nostalgia’, pushing the idea that HIV/AIDS is a thing of the past and ignoring the ways in which the virus continues to shape individual social and sexual experiences. Recently, however, new plays such as Jonathan Harvey’s Canary (2010), the GHP Collective’s The Gay Heritage Project (2013), and Matthew Lopez’s The Inheritance (2018) have explicitly addressed this issue, conceptualizing a revised queer politics of HIV/AIDS that transcends Angels’ famous call for ‘The Great Work’ to begin. This article explores how The Inheritance in particular problematizes ‘AIDS nostalgia’ and configures novel approaches to the politics of HIV/AIDS in the twenty-first century. Alongside scholarship within the field of queer utopian studies such as José Estaban Muñoz’s Cruising Utopia (2009) and Jill Dolan’s Utopia in Performance (2005), it analyses the ways in which Lopez’s play employs utopian performatives to move towards a new politics of queer heritage.","PeriodicalId":42863,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/english/efaa014","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efaa014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the HIV/AIDS epidemic approaches its fifth decade, and emerging generations of queer-identified youth experience and conceptualize the virus in new ways, questions surrounding the memorialization and historicization of queer history have arisen within the arts. In the domain of theatre in particular, as mainstream revivals of crisis-era plays such as Larry Kramer’s The Normal Heart (1985) and Tony Kushner’s Angels in America (1991) proliferate, criticisms have arisen that such revivals feed into a narrative of the so-called ‘AIDS nostalgia’, pushing the idea that HIV/AIDS is a thing of the past and ignoring the ways in which the virus continues to shape individual social and sexual experiences. Recently, however, new plays such as Jonathan Harvey’s Canary (2010), the GHP Collective’s The Gay Heritage Project (2013), and Matthew Lopez’s The Inheritance (2018) have explicitly addressed this issue, conceptualizing a revised queer politics of HIV/AIDS that transcends Angels’ famous call for ‘The Great Work’ to begin. This article explores how The Inheritance in particular problematizes ‘AIDS nostalgia’ and configures novel approaches to the politics of HIV/AIDS in the twenty-first century. Alongside scholarship within the field of queer utopian studies such as José Estaban Muñoz’s Cruising Utopia (2009) and Jill Dolan’s Utopia in Performance (2005), it analyses the ways in which Lopez’s play employs utopian performatives to move towards a new politics of queer heritage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“如果我们不能与过去对话,那么我们的未来将是什么?”:马修·洛佩兹的《遗产》中的艾滋病毒/艾滋病、酷儿世代主义和乌托邦行为
随着艾滋病毒/艾滋病流行病进入第五个十年,新一代的酷儿青年以新的方式体验和概念化病毒,围绕酷儿历史的纪念和历史化的问题在艺术中出现了。特别是在戏剧领域,随着危机时期戏剧的主流复兴,如拉里·克莱默的《平心静气》(1985)和托尼·库什纳的《美国天使》(1991)的激增,批评人士认为,这种复兴助长了所谓的“艾滋病怀旧”的叙述,推动了艾滋病毒/艾滋病是过去的事情的想法,忽视了病毒继续塑造个人社会和性经历的方式。然而,最近,诸如乔纳森·哈维的《金丝雀》(2010年)、GHP集体的《同性恋遗产项目》(2013年)和马修·洛佩兹的《遗产》(2018年)等新剧明确地解决了这个问题,将HIV/AIDS的修订酷儿政治概念化,超越了天使对“伟大工作”开始的著名呼吁。本文特别探讨了《遗产》如何将“艾滋病怀旧”问题化,并为21世纪的艾滋病毒/艾滋病政治配置了新的方法。除了酷儿乌托邦研究领域的学术研究,如jos·埃斯丹Muñoz的《巡航乌托邦》(2009)和吉尔·多兰的《表演中的乌托邦》(2005),它还分析了洛佩兹的戏剧如何运用乌托邦表演来走向酷儿遗产的新政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ENGLISH
ENGLISH LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: English is an internationally known journal of literary criticism, published on behalf of The English Association. Each issue contains essays on major works of English literature or on topics of general literary interest, aimed at readers within universities and colleges and presented in a lively and engaging style. There is a substantial review section, in which reviewers have space to situate a book within the context of recent developments in its field, and present a detailed argument. English is unusual among academic journals in publishing original poetry. This policy embodies the view that the critical and creative functions, often so widely separated in the teaching of English, can co-exist and cross-fertilise each other.
期刊最新文献
Silence in the Classroom: reflections on teaching poetry in UK secondary schools and universities ‘All These Unimportant Details’: John Ashbery at home Leftover liquids and the moisture of mourning: the oozes of Ocean Vuong’s oeuvre A manifesto for communication studies Becoming less silent readers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1