Analytical Method Development and Validation for Determination of Assay of Antibacterial Drugs Besifloxacin Hydrochloride and Phenoxyethanol in Gel Formulation

Neelam Pawar, Pradeep Kundu, N. Minocha, Asha Poonia
{"title":"Analytical Method Development and Validation for\nDetermination of Assay of Antibacterial Drugs Besifloxacin Hydrochloride and Phenoxyethanol in Gel Formulation","authors":"Neelam Pawar, Pradeep Kundu, N. Minocha, Asha Poonia","doi":"10.2174/2211352521666230331111623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe present work aims to develop an analytical method and validate it to determine the assay of an antibacterial dug-in gel formulation.\n\n\n\nBackground: Analytical Method Validation is a process involving confirmation studies that procedure/ method/ system/ analyst provides precise and reproducible outcome recognized by research laboratory studies that the performance features of the technique follows the necessities required for the analytical applications.\n\n\n\nAnalytical Method Validation is a process involving confirmation studies that procedure/ method/ system/ analyst provides precise and reproducible outcomes recognized by research laboratory studies that the performance features of the technique follow the necessities required for the analytical applications.\n\n\n\nAnalytical Method Validation is a process involving confirmation studies that procedure/ method/ system/ analyst provides precise and reproducible outcomes recognized by research laboratory studies that the performance features of the technique follow the necessities required for the analytical applications.\n\n\n\nObjective: To improve the conditions and parameters which should be followed in the development and validation by developing a new sensitive and accurate RP-HPLC method. Validating the proposed newly developed methods per the analytical parameters mentioned in the IP, USP, BP and ICH guidelines.\n\n\n\nHPLC method was validated to indicate that the analytical procedure used is suitable for intended use by using various parameters like specificity, linearity, LOD, LOQ, precision, accuracy, range, robustness, stability in analytical solution and system suitability.\n\n\n\nHPLC method was validated to indicate that the analytical procedure used is suitable for intended use by using various parameters like specificity, linearity, LOD, LOQ, precision, accuracy, range, robustness, stability in analytical solution and system suitability.\n\n\n\nThe standard retention times for the Drug Besifloxacin were 7.781 min, and the sample was 7.731, respectively. The area of standard besifloxacin was 1828547, and the sample area was 1825315. The assay of the sample was 98%. The retention times for the drug Phenoxyethanol standard were found to be 2.010 min, and the sample was at 2.004, respectively. The Area of standard Phenoxyethanol was 438025, and the sample area was 438103. The assay of the sample was 97.04%. The RSD for 5 replicate injections for each peak is 0.33% in system suitability. In specificity, peaks of Diluent, Placebo & Impurities are not interfering with the Besifloxacin peaks. Peaks of Besifloxacin were found to be pure. Degradation products were found to be well separated from the besifloxacin peak. The peak purity factor was NLT 0.9995. In the precision study, the System Precision RSD of the Retention time for Besifloxacin obtained from six replicate injections was 0.33%. The RSD of the Area of Besifloxacin obtained from six replicate injections is 0.46%. Method precision RSD was calculated on 6 determinations assay value of Drug besifloxacin is 0.56%. The RSD calculated on 6 determinations for the assay value of the Drug besifloxacin is 0.50%. In Intermediate precision, RSD was calculated on 6 determinations for the assay value of the Drug besifloxacin is 0.50%. The RSD calculated on 12 determinations (Method precision & Intermediate precision) for assay value is 0.50%. Stability in the analytical solution for the standard and sample, the area difference of besifloxacin peak was within ±2.0% from initial Linearity. The correlation coefficient & regression coefficient (R square) should be not less than 0.995 for Besifloxacin Correlation Coefficient is 0.998 Regression coefficient is 1.000. The % intercept should be within ±5.0% of the response at 100% level Precision at 50% & 150% levels; the RSD is 0.01%. Precision at 50% & 200% level: the RSD was found to be NMT 2.0%. Accuracy means % recovery at each level found to be between 98 to 101 % of the drug besifloxacin. RSD on 9 (3 levels X 3) determinations is 1.2, following the NMT 2% range criteria. A correlation was 1.0% for the accuracy and linearity parameters.\n\n\n\nThe % recovery is between 98% to 101%, and the % RSD for all recovery values is 1.41% which is within limits. The HPLC method optimized the conditions to obtain an adequate separation of eluted compounds.\n\n\n\nThe % recovery is between 98% to 101%, and the % RSD for all recovery values is 1.41% which is within limits. The HPLC method optimized the conditions to obtain an adequate separation of eluted compounds.\n","PeriodicalId":7951,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Infective Agents","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Infective Agents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2211352521666230331111623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work aims to develop an analytical method and validate it to determine the assay of an antibacterial dug-in gel formulation. Background: Analytical Method Validation is a process involving confirmation studies that procedure/ method/ system/ analyst provides precise and reproducible outcome recognized by research laboratory studies that the performance features of the technique follows the necessities required for the analytical applications. Analytical Method Validation is a process involving confirmation studies that procedure/ method/ system/ analyst provides precise and reproducible outcomes recognized by research laboratory studies that the performance features of the technique follow the necessities required for the analytical applications. Analytical Method Validation is a process involving confirmation studies that procedure/ method/ system/ analyst provides precise and reproducible outcomes recognized by research laboratory studies that the performance features of the technique follow the necessities required for the analytical applications. Objective: To improve the conditions and parameters which should be followed in the development and validation by developing a new sensitive and accurate RP-HPLC method. Validating the proposed newly developed methods per the analytical parameters mentioned in the IP, USP, BP and ICH guidelines. HPLC method was validated to indicate that the analytical procedure used is suitable for intended use by using various parameters like specificity, linearity, LOD, LOQ, precision, accuracy, range, robustness, stability in analytical solution and system suitability. HPLC method was validated to indicate that the analytical procedure used is suitable for intended use by using various parameters like specificity, linearity, LOD, LOQ, precision, accuracy, range, robustness, stability in analytical solution and system suitability. The standard retention times for the Drug Besifloxacin were 7.781 min, and the sample was 7.731, respectively. The area of standard besifloxacin was 1828547, and the sample area was 1825315. The assay of the sample was 98%. The retention times for the drug Phenoxyethanol standard were found to be 2.010 min, and the sample was at 2.004, respectively. The Area of standard Phenoxyethanol was 438025, and the sample area was 438103. The assay of the sample was 97.04%. The RSD for 5 replicate injections for each peak is 0.33% in system suitability. In specificity, peaks of Diluent, Placebo & Impurities are not interfering with the Besifloxacin peaks. Peaks of Besifloxacin were found to be pure. Degradation products were found to be well separated from the besifloxacin peak. The peak purity factor was NLT 0.9995. In the precision study, the System Precision RSD of the Retention time for Besifloxacin obtained from six replicate injections was 0.33%. The RSD of the Area of Besifloxacin obtained from six replicate injections is 0.46%. Method precision RSD was calculated on 6 determinations assay value of Drug besifloxacin is 0.56%. The RSD calculated on 6 determinations for the assay value of the Drug besifloxacin is 0.50%. In Intermediate precision, RSD was calculated on 6 determinations for the assay value of the Drug besifloxacin is 0.50%. The RSD calculated on 12 determinations (Method precision & Intermediate precision) for assay value is 0.50%. Stability in the analytical solution for the standard and sample, the area difference of besifloxacin peak was within ±2.0% from initial Linearity. The correlation coefficient & regression coefficient (R square) should be not less than 0.995 for Besifloxacin Correlation Coefficient is 0.998 Regression coefficient is 1.000. The % intercept should be within ±5.0% of the response at 100% level Precision at 50% & 150% levels; the RSD is 0.01%. Precision at 50% & 200% level: the RSD was found to be NMT 2.0%. Accuracy means % recovery at each level found to be between 98 to 101 % of the drug besifloxacin. RSD on 9 (3 levels X 3) determinations is 1.2, following the NMT 2% range criteria. A correlation was 1.0% for the accuracy and linearity parameters. The % recovery is between 98% to 101%, and the % RSD for all recovery values is 1.41% which is within limits. The HPLC method optimized the conditions to obtain an adequate separation of eluted compounds. The % recovery is between 98% to 101%, and the % RSD for all recovery values is 1.41% which is within limits. The HPLC method optimized the conditions to obtain an adequate separation of eluted compounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测定凝胶制剂中抗菌药物盐酸贝西沙星和苯氧乙醇含量的分析方法的建立和验证
本工作旨在开发一种分析方法,并对其进行验证,以确定抗菌挖孔凝胶制剂的含量。背景:分析方法验证是一个涉及确认研究的过程,程序/方法/系统/分析员提供了研究实验室研究认可的精确和可重复的结果,即该技术的性能特征符合分析应用所需的必要性。分析方法验证是一个涉及确认研究的过程,程序/方法/系统/分析员提供了研究实验室研究认可的精确和可重复的结果,即技术的性能特征符合分析应用所需的必要性。分析方法验证是一个涉及确认研究的过程,程序/方法/系统/分析员提供了研究实验室研究认可的精确和可重复的结果,即技术的性能特征符合分析应用所需的必要性。目的:建立一种灵敏、准确的反相高效液相色谱新方法,改进开发和验证时应遵循的条件和参数。根据IP、USP、BP和ICH指南中提到的分析参数验证拟议的新开发方法。通过使用各种参数,如特异性、线性、LOD、LOQ、精密度、准确度、范围、稳健性、分析溶液稳定性和系统适用性,对HPLC方法进行了验证,表明所使用的分析程序适用于预期用途。通过使用各种参数,如特异性、线性、LOD、LOQ、精密度、准确度、范围、稳健性、分析溶液稳定性和系统适用性,对HPLC方法进行了验证,表明所使用的分析程序适用于预期用途。药物贝西沙星的标准保留时间分别为7.781分钟和7.731分钟。贝西沙星标准品面积为1828547,样品面积为1825315。样品的含量测定为98%。发现药物苯氧乙醇标准品的保留时间分别为2.010分钟和2.004。标准苯氧乙醇的面积为438025,样品面积为438103。样品的含量测定为97.04%。在系统适用性方面,5次重复注射的每个峰的RSD为0.33%。在特异性方面,稀释剂、安慰剂和杂质的峰值不会干扰贝西沙星的峰值。贝西沙星的峰被发现是纯的。降解产物与贝西沙星峰分离良好。峰纯度因子为0.9995。在精密度研究中,6次重复注射贝西沙星保留时间的系统精密度RSD为0.33%,6次重复注射液贝西沙星面积的RSD为0.46%中精密度:本品测定值经6次测定计算,相对标准偏差为0.50%。测定值经12次测定计算(方法精密度和中精密度),相对标准差为0.50%,在标准品和样品分析液中的稳定性较好,贝西沙星峰面积差与初始线性度相差在±2.0%以内。贝西沙星的相关系数和回归系数(R平方)应不小于0.995。相关系数为0.998。回归系数为1.000。%截距应在100%水平下响应的±5.0%范围内50%和150%水平下的精度;在50%和200%水平上的精密度:发现RSD为NMT 2.0%。准确度是指在药物贝西沙星的98至101%之间的每个水平上的回收率%。9次(3个水平X 3次)测定的RSD为1.2,符合NMT 2%的范围标准。准确度和线性参数的相关性为1.0%。回收率在98%至101%之间,所有回收值的%RSD为1.41%,在限值内。HPLC方法优化了条件以获得洗脱化合物的充分分离。回收率在98%至101%之间,所有回收值的%RSD为1.41%,在限值内。HPLC方法优化了条件以获得洗脱化合物的充分分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anti-Infective Agents
Anti-Infective Agents Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Anti-Infective Agents publishes original research articles, full-length/mini reviews, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues on all the latest and outstanding developments on the medicinal chemistry, biology, pharmacology and use of anti-infective and anti-parasitic agents. The scope of the journal covers all pre-clinical and clinical research on antimicrobials, antibacterials, antiviral, antifungal, and antiparasitic agents. Anti-Infective Agents is an essential journal for all infectious disease researchers in industry, academia and the health services.
期刊最新文献
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Antidandruff Shampoo Herbal Antibiotics: A Review of Traditional Medicinal Plants with Antibacterial Properties and Their Potential for Future Treatment In silico Screening of Plectranthus amboinicus and Hyptis suaveolens Phyto-chemicals: Novel Repellents Targeting Odorant Binding Proteins of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus From Plants to Pills: Malaria Treatment Advancements in India Evaluation of the Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Hydrosol Extract and Essential Oil Derived from the Aerial Parts of Salvia argentea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1