After the posts: thinking with theory in environmental education research

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australian Journal of Environmental Education Pub Date : 2022-06-20 DOI:10.1017/aee.2022.25
Annette Gough, N. Gough
{"title":"After the posts: thinking with theory in environmental education research","authors":"Annette Gough, N. Gough","doi":"10.1017/aee.2022.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this essay, we argue that postqualitative inquiry is not a useful descriptor for environmental education research and that it is time to consider what comes after the posts. We argue that thinking with theory as a process methodology in the onto-epistemological framings of our research is more generative and opens up opportunities for this research being interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary/cross-disciplinary, intersectional, ecofeminist/more-than-humanist, indigenous, participatory, experimental and transgressive.","PeriodicalId":44842,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2022.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this essay, we argue that postqualitative inquiry is not a useful descriptor for environmental education research and that it is time to consider what comes after the posts. We argue that thinking with theory as a process methodology in the onto-epistemological framings of our research is more generative and opens up opportunities for this research being interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary/cross-disciplinary, intersectional, ecofeminist/more-than-humanist, indigenous, participatory, experimental and transgressive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后岗位:用理论思考环境教育研究
摘要在这篇文章中,我们认为质后探究对于环境教育研究来说不是一个有用的描述,现在是时候考虑质后探究之后的内容了。我们认为,在我们研究的认识论框架中,将理论作为一种过程方法论进行思考更具创造性,并为这项研究提供了跨学科/跨学科/交叉学科、交叉性、生态女权主义/而非人文主义、本土性、参与性、实验性和越轨性的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Environmental Education
Australian Journal of Environmental Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: An internationally refereed journal which publishes papers and reports on all aspects of environmental education. It presents information and argument which stimulates debate about educational strategies that enhance the kinds of awareness, understanding and actions which will promote environmental and social justice.
期刊最新文献
Decolonising Australian Gold Rush Narratives with Critical Geopolitics “It’s the Only World We’ve Got.” Children’s Responses to Chris Jordan’s Images about SDG 14: Life Below Water Towards an Indigenous-Informed Multispecies Collaboratory Energising the Energy Literacy Debate for Environmental Education: Exploring Citizens’ Interest Levels, Knowledge Gaps and Individual Differences Caring Enough to Counter Extinction: The Work of Volunteer Bat Carers and Educators in Tropical Queensland, Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1