Negotiating change for gender equality: identifying leverages, overcoming barriers

IF 0.5 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES Investigaciones Feministas Pub Date : 2021-06-18 DOI:10.5209/infe.72319
Marcela Linková, Lut Mergaert
{"title":"Negotiating change for gender equality: identifying leverages, overcoming barriers","authors":"Marcela Linková, Lut Mergaert","doi":"10.5209/infe.72319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Institutional change through gender equality plans is today the dominant approach to promoting gender equality in higher education and research. Building on our experiences as “technical support partners” in several EU-funded projects, we reflect on how change is negotiated in a variety of contexts. Objectives. Theoretically, using Feminist Institutionalism and the Science and Technology Studies concept of the trading zone, our objective is to analyse institutional negotiations among various, differently positioned actors with diverse backgrounds, value systems and negotiating power. From a practice-oriented perspective, our aim is to demonstrate typical challenges, suggest pathways towards solutions, and identify specific negotiation skills which underscore the capacity-building needs of change agents. Methodology. For our analysis, we have selected eight information-rich case studies through purposive theory-based sampling, illustrating the different transactions in the trading zones, based on our prior knowledge of the circumstances. The methods we draw on are primarily participant observation and textual analysis of project documents. Results. The selected theoretical combination allows us to identify leverages, ways to overcome barriers and the required skills and competences. Specifically, we underscore the use of participatory and co-creation techniques, strategic framing, spotting and using windows of opportunity, and wide mobilisation of stakeholders. We highlight key features of the change process, including its processual and incremental nature, the need for constant negotiation and the capacity-building needs of change agents. Contribution. With this analysis, we contribute, firstly, to the understanding of organisational change by identifying concrete barriers and opportunities as well as considering the ways in which a shared representation of gender equality is developed. The second, theoretical contribution lies in combining Feminist Institutionalism and the concept of the trading zone, which allows us to bring to productive dialogue issues of power, processuality and the need to address both material and discursive enactments of change processes.","PeriodicalId":43469,"journal":{"name":"Investigaciones Feministas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigaciones Feministas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.72319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. Institutional change through gender equality plans is today the dominant approach to promoting gender equality in higher education and research. Building on our experiences as “technical support partners” in several EU-funded projects, we reflect on how change is negotiated in a variety of contexts. Objectives. Theoretically, using Feminist Institutionalism and the Science and Technology Studies concept of the trading zone, our objective is to analyse institutional negotiations among various, differently positioned actors with diverse backgrounds, value systems and negotiating power. From a practice-oriented perspective, our aim is to demonstrate typical challenges, suggest pathways towards solutions, and identify specific negotiation skills which underscore the capacity-building needs of change agents. Methodology. For our analysis, we have selected eight information-rich case studies through purposive theory-based sampling, illustrating the different transactions in the trading zones, based on our prior knowledge of the circumstances. The methods we draw on are primarily participant observation and textual analysis of project documents. Results. The selected theoretical combination allows us to identify leverages, ways to overcome barriers and the required skills and competences. Specifically, we underscore the use of participatory and co-creation techniques, strategic framing, spotting and using windows of opportunity, and wide mobilisation of stakeholders. We highlight key features of the change process, including its processual and incremental nature, the need for constant negotiation and the capacity-building needs of change agents. Contribution. With this analysis, we contribute, firstly, to the understanding of organisational change by identifying concrete barriers and opportunities as well as considering the ways in which a shared representation of gender equality is developed. The second, theoretical contribution lies in combining Feminist Institutionalism and the concept of the trading zone, which allows us to bring to productive dialogue issues of power, processuality and the need to address both material and discursive enactments of change processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谈判性别平等变革:确定杠杆,克服障碍
介绍通过性别平等计划进行体制改革是当今促进高等教育和研究中性别平等的主要方法。基于我们在几个欧盟资助项目中作为“技术支持合作伙伴”的经验,我们反思了如何在各种情况下谈判变革。目标。从理论上讲,利用女权主义制度主义和贸易区的科学技术研究概念,我们的目标是分析具有不同背景、价值体系和谈判能力的不同地位的行为者之间的制度谈判。从注重实践的角度来看,我们的目标是展示典型的挑战,提出解决方案的途径,并确定强调变革推动者能力建设需求的具体谈判技能。方法论为了进行分析,我们通过有目的的基于理论的抽样选择了八个信息丰富的案例研究,根据我们对情况的先验知识,说明了交易区内的不同交易。我们采用的方法主要是参与者观察和项目文件的文本分析。后果选定的理论组合使我们能够确定杠杆作用、克服障碍的方法以及所需的技能和能力。具体而言,我们强调使用参与和共同创造技术、战略框架、发现和利用机会之窗,以及广泛动员利益相关者。我们强调了变革进程的主要特点,包括其过程性和渐进性、不断谈判的必要性以及变革推动者的能力建设需求。捐款通过这一分析,我们首先有助于通过识别具体的障碍和机会,以及考虑如何发展性别平等的共同代表性,来理解组织变革。第二,理论上的贡献在于将女权主义制度主义与贸易区概念相结合,这使我们能够就权力、过程性以及解决变革过程的物质和话语制定的必要性等问题进行富有成效的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investigaciones Feministas
Investigaciones Feministas WOMENS STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Zoe Zenghelis y la representación gráfica del proyecto turístico Desafíos para las científicas en contexto de vulnerabilidad: corresponsabilidad y productividad académica La imagen de la mujer en la Trilogía Roja de Zhang Yimou: silencio y resistencia en las estructuras patriarcales chinas Desigualdad de género en el mercado laboral en España en tiempos de crisis sanitaria global Sanna Marin y una nueva forma de hacer comunicación política a través de Instagram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1