{"title":"Trialability and Purposefulness: Their Role Towards Google Classroom Acceptance Following Educational Policy","authors":"S. Oluyinka, Maria N. Cusipag","doi":"10.18267/j.aip.154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the COVID-19 pandemic experiences of Filipino students, the face-to-face mode of instruction in the classroom has been phased out in exchange for online learning platforms such as Google Classroom (GCR) among some K-12 learners. As advised by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), most colleges and universities had to try available learning management systems;hence, this research study aimed to investigate the role of trialability and purposefulness towards GCR acceptance among tertiary institutions following the CHED educational policy. The researchers came up with eight hypotheses, which suggested that purposefulness may influence educational policy and acceptance of GCR. Trialability of GCR may influence educational policy and technical access. One thousand sixty-six (1066) respondents from six public higher institutions of learning were given online questionnaire;however, only 913 users were considered for the structural equation modelling and indirect effect of the suggested factors in this study. Using SmartPLS 3.0, the findings revealed that except for the hypothesis on institutional willingness (p< 0.054), all the hypotheses were highly supported at the level of significance p < 0.00 to p< 0.005. Thus, this study proves that GCR is an appropriate platform for colleges and universities. Trialability and purposefulness are two great factors that contributed to the acceptance and adoption of GCR in higher institutions of learning. Future researchers are therefore encouraged to replicate this study and validate the findings since the use of GCR is relatively new among Filipino teachers and learners. © 2021 by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":36592,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Pragensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Pragensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
三元性和目的性:教育政策对谷歌课堂接受的作用
鉴于菲律宾学生在2019冠状病毒病大流行中的经历,课堂上面对面的教学模式已被逐步淘汰,取而代之的是一些K-12学生的谷歌课堂(GCR)等在线学习平台。根据高等教育委员会(CHED)的建议,大多数学院和大学必须尝试现有的学习管理系统;因此,本研究旨在调查在高等教育委员会教育政策实施后,高等教育机构接受GCR的可试探性和目的性的作用。研究人员提出了八个假设,这表明目的性可能会影响教育政策和对GCR的接受程度。GCR的可试性可能影响教育政策和技术获取。我们对来自六所公立高等院校的1666名(1066名)受访者进行了在线问卷调查,然而,本研究仅考虑了913名用户进行结构方程建模和建议因素的间接影响。使用SmartPLS 3.0,结果显示,除制度意愿假说(p< 0.054)外,其余假说在显著性水平p< 0.00 ~ p< 0.005上得到高度支持。因此,本研究证明GCR是一个适合高校的平台。可试性和目的性是高等院校接受和采用GCR的两个重要因素。因此,鼓励未来的研究人员重复这项研究并验证研究结果,因为GCR在菲律宾教师和学习者中使用相对较新。©作者2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。