Measuring functional outcomes in schizophrenia in an increasingly digital world

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research-Cognition Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.scog.2022.100248
Anja Searle , Luke Allen , Millie Lowther , Jack Cotter , Jennifer H. Barnett
{"title":"Measuring functional outcomes in schizophrenia in an increasingly digital world","authors":"Anja Searle ,&nbsp;Luke Allen ,&nbsp;Millie Lowther ,&nbsp;Jack Cotter ,&nbsp;Jennifer H. Barnett","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2022.100248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With an unmet clinical need for effective interventions for cognitive and negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia, measures of functional status (often a co-primary endpoint) remain key clinical trial outcomes. This review aims to give an overview of the different types of functional assessments commonly used in clinical trials and research involving patients with schizophrenia and highlight pertinent challenges surrounding the use of these as reliable, sensitive, and specific assessments in intervention trials. We provide examples of commonly used functional measures and highlight emerging real-time digital assessment tools. Informant- and clinician-rated functional outcome measures and functional capacity assessments are valid, commonly used measures of functional status that try to overcome the need for often overly ambitious and insensitive ‘real world’ milestones. The wide range of scientific and practical challenges associated with these different tools leave room for the development of improved functional outcome measures for use in clinical trials. In particular, many existing measures fail to capture small, but meaningful, functional changes that may occur over the course of typically short intervention trials. Adding passive digital data collection and short active real-time digital assessments whilst patients go about their day offers the opportunity to build a more fine-grained picture of functional improvements that, if thoughtfully developed and carefully applied, could provide the sensitivity needed to accurately evaluate functional status in intervention studies, aiding the development of desperately needed treatments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001322000130/pdfft?md5=37f890d32a92cb34bfda066b2db23a57&pid=1-s2.0-S2215001322000130-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001322000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With an unmet clinical need for effective interventions for cognitive and negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia, measures of functional status (often a co-primary endpoint) remain key clinical trial outcomes. This review aims to give an overview of the different types of functional assessments commonly used in clinical trials and research involving patients with schizophrenia and highlight pertinent challenges surrounding the use of these as reliable, sensitive, and specific assessments in intervention trials. We provide examples of commonly used functional measures and highlight emerging real-time digital assessment tools. Informant- and clinician-rated functional outcome measures and functional capacity assessments are valid, commonly used measures of functional status that try to overcome the need for often overly ambitious and insensitive ‘real world’ milestones. The wide range of scientific and practical challenges associated with these different tools leave room for the development of improved functional outcome measures for use in clinical trials. In particular, many existing measures fail to capture small, but meaningful, functional changes that may occur over the course of typically short intervention trials. Adding passive digital data collection and short active real-time digital assessments whilst patients go about their day offers the opportunity to build a more fine-grained picture of functional improvements that, if thoughtfully developed and carefully applied, could provide the sensitivity needed to accurately evaluate functional status in intervention studies, aiding the development of desperately needed treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在日益数字化的世界中衡量精神分裂症的功能结果
由于对精神分裂症患者的认知和阴性症状进行有效干预的临床需求尚未得到满足,功能状态的测量(通常是共同主要终点)仍然是关键的临床试验结果。本综述旨在概述在涉及精神分裂症患者的临床试验和研究中常用的不同类型的功能评估,并强调在干预试验中使用这些作为可靠、敏感和特异性评估的相关挑战。我们提供了常用功能度量的示例,并重点介绍了新兴的实时数字评估工具。信息提供者和临床医生评价的功能结果测量和功能能力评估是有效的,通常用于功能状态的测量,试图克服通常过于雄心勃勃和不敏感的“现实世界”里程碑的需要。与这些不同工具相关的广泛的科学和实践挑战为开发用于临床试验的改进功能结果测量留下了空间。特别是,许多现有的措施未能捕捉到在典型的短期干预试验过程中可能发生的微小但有意义的功能变化。在患者日常生活中增加被动的数字数据收集和简短的主动实时数字评估,为构建更精细的功能改善图像提供了机会,如果经过深思熟虑的开发和仔细应用,可以提供在干预研究中准确评估功能状态所需的灵敏度,帮助开发迫切需要的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
Cognitive functioning and functional ability in women with schizophrenia and homelessness Humor processing and its relationship with clinical features in patients with first-episode schizophrenia Through the lens of schizophrenia: Recognizing negative facial expressions and family patterns Transcranial direct current stimulation and its effect on cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia: An updated review Advances in the ecological validity of research on social cognition in schizophrenia: A systematic review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1