Measurement of Ability in Adaptive Learning and Assessment Systems when Learners Use On-Demand Hints

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL Applied Psychological Measurement Pub Date : 2022-04-18 DOI:10.1177/01466216221084208
M. Bolsinova, Benjamin E. Deonovic, Meirav Arieli-Attali, Burr Settles, Masato Hagiwara, G. Maris
{"title":"Measurement of Ability in Adaptive Learning and Assessment Systems when Learners Use On-Demand Hints","authors":"M. Bolsinova, Benjamin E. Deonovic, Meirav Arieli-Attali, Burr Settles, Masato Hagiwara, G. Maris","doi":"10.1177/01466216221084208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adaptive learning and assessment systems support learners in acquiring knowledge and skills in a particular domain. The learners’ progress is monitored through them solving items matching their level and aiming at specific learning goals. Scaffolding and providing learners with hints are powerful tools in helping the learning process. One way of introducing hints is to make hint use the choice of the student. When the learner is certain of their response, they answer without hints, but if the learner is not certain or does not know how to approach the item they can request a hint. We develop measurement models for applications where such on-demand hints are available. Such models take into account that hint use may be informative of ability, but at the same time may be influenced by other individual characteristics. Two modeling strategies are considered: (1) The measurement model is based on a scoring rule for ability which includes both response accuracy and hint use. (2) The choice to use hints and response accuracy conditional on this choice are modeled jointly using Item Response Tree models. The properties of different models and their implications are discussed. An application to data from Duolingo, an adaptive language learning system, is presented. Here, the best model is the scoring-rule-based model with full credit for correct responses without hints, partial credit for correct responses with hints, and no credit for all incorrect responses. The second dimension in the model accounts for the individual differences in the tendency to use hints.","PeriodicalId":48300,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychological Measurement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychological Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216221084208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Adaptive learning and assessment systems support learners in acquiring knowledge and skills in a particular domain. The learners’ progress is monitored through them solving items matching their level and aiming at specific learning goals. Scaffolding and providing learners with hints are powerful tools in helping the learning process. One way of introducing hints is to make hint use the choice of the student. When the learner is certain of their response, they answer without hints, but if the learner is not certain or does not know how to approach the item they can request a hint. We develop measurement models for applications where such on-demand hints are available. Such models take into account that hint use may be informative of ability, but at the same time may be influenced by other individual characteristics. Two modeling strategies are considered: (1) The measurement model is based on a scoring rule for ability which includes both response accuracy and hint use. (2) The choice to use hints and response accuracy conditional on this choice are modeled jointly using Item Response Tree models. The properties of different models and their implications are discussed. An application to data from Duolingo, an adaptive language learning system, is presented. Here, the best model is the scoring-rule-based model with full credit for correct responses without hints, partial credit for correct responses with hints, and no credit for all incorrect responses. The second dimension in the model accounts for the individual differences in the tendency to use hints.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当学习者使用随需应变提示时,自适应学习和评估系统中的能力测量
适应性学习和评估系统支持学习者获取特定领域的知识和技能。通过解决与他们的水平相匹配的问题,并针对特定的学习目标来监测学习者的进步。脚手架和为学习者提供提示是帮助学习过程的强大工具。引入提示的一种方法是让提示使用学生的选择。当学习者确定自己的回答时,他们不需要提示,但如果学习者不确定或不知道如何接近这个项目,他们可以要求提示。我们为这些按需提示可用的应用程序开发测量模型。这些模型考虑到暗示的使用可能是能力的信息,但同时也可能受到其他个体特征的影响。考虑了两种建模策略:(1)测量模型基于能力评分规则,该规则包括反应准确性和提示使用。(2)采用Item response Tree模型对提示的选择和基于提示的回答精度进行联合建模。讨论了不同模型的性质及其含义。介绍了一种基于自适应语言学习系统“多邻国”的数据处理方法。在这里,最好的模型是基于评分规则的模型,对没有提示的正确回答得满分,对有提示的正确回答得部分分,对所有错误的回答不得分。模型中的第二个维度解释了使用暗示倾向的个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Applied Psychological Measurement publishes empirical research on the application of techniques of psychological measurement to substantive problems in all areas of psychology and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Differential Item Functioning on Computer Adaptive Testing Under Different Conditions. Evaluating the Construct Validity of Instructional Manipulation Checks as Measures of Careless Responding to Surveys. A Mark-Recapture Approach to Estimating Item Pool Compromise. Estimating Test-Retest Reliability in the Presence of Self-Selection Bias and Learning/Practice Effects. The Improved EMS Algorithm for Latent Variable Selection in M3PL Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1