Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Twin in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review

IF 3.4 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Informatics Pub Date : 2023-01-28 DOI:10.3390/informatics10010014
D. Opoku, S. Perera, R. Osei-Kyei, M. Rashidi, K. Bamdad, Tosin Famakinwa
{"title":"Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Twin in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review","authors":"D. Opoku, S. Perera, R. Osei-Kyei, M. Rashidi, K. Bamdad, Tosin Famakinwa","doi":"10.3390/informatics10010014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital twin (DT) has gained significant recognition among researchers due to its potential across industries. With the prime goal of solving numerous challenges confronting the construction industry (CI), DT in recent years has witnessed several applications in the CI. Hence, researchers have been advocating for DT adoption to tackle the challenges of the CI. Notwithstanding, a distinguishable set of barriers that oppose the adoption of DT in the CI has not been determined. Therefore, this paper identifies the barriers and incorporates them into a classified framework to enhance the roadmap for adopting DT in the CI. This research conducts an extensive review of the literature and analyses the barriers whilst integrating the science mapping technique. Using Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases, 154 related bibliographic records were identified and analysed using science mapping, while 40 carefully selected relevant publications were systematically reviewed. From the review, the top five barriers identified include low level of knowledge, low level of technology acceptance, lack of clear DT value propositions, project complexities, and static nature of building data. The results show that the UK, China, the USA, and Germany are the countries spearheading the DT adoption in the CI, while only a small number of institutions from Australia, the UK, Algeria, and Greece have established institutional collaborations for DT research. A conceptual framework was developed on the basis of 30 identified barriers to support the DT adoption roadmap. The main categories of the framework comprise stakeholder-oriented, industry-related, construction-enterprise-related, and technology-related barriers. The identified barriers and the framework will guide and broaden the knowledge of DT, which is critical for successful adoption in the construction industry.","PeriodicalId":37100,"journal":{"name":"Informatics","volume":"10 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Digital twin (DT) has gained significant recognition among researchers due to its potential across industries. With the prime goal of solving numerous challenges confronting the construction industry (CI), DT in recent years has witnessed several applications in the CI. Hence, researchers have been advocating for DT adoption to tackle the challenges of the CI. Notwithstanding, a distinguishable set of barriers that oppose the adoption of DT in the CI has not been determined. Therefore, this paper identifies the barriers and incorporates them into a classified framework to enhance the roadmap for adopting DT in the CI. This research conducts an extensive review of the literature and analyses the barriers whilst integrating the science mapping technique. Using Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases, 154 related bibliographic records were identified and analysed using science mapping, while 40 carefully selected relevant publications were systematically reviewed. From the review, the top five barriers identified include low level of knowledge, low level of technology acceptance, lack of clear DT value propositions, project complexities, and static nature of building data. The results show that the UK, China, the USA, and Germany are the countries spearheading the DT adoption in the CI, while only a small number of institutions from Australia, the UK, Algeria, and Greece have established institutional collaborations for DT research. A conceptual framework was developed on the basis of 30 identified barriers to support the DT adoption roadmap. The main categories of the framework comprise stakeholder-oriented, industry-related, construction-enterprise-related, and technology-related barriers. The identified barriers and the framework will guide and broaden the knowledge of DT, which is critical for successful adoption in the construction industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑行业采用数字孪生的障碍:文献综述
数字孪生(DT)因其跨行业的潜力而在研究人员中获得了极大的认可。DT的主要目标是解决建筑业(CI)面临的众多挑战,近年来,DT在CI中出现了一些应用。因此,研究人员一直在倡导采用DT来应对CI的挑战。尽管如此,反对在CI中采用DT的一组明显障碍尚未确定。因此,本文确定了障碍,并将其纳入一个分类框架,以加强在CI中采用DT的路线图。本研究对文献进行了广泛的回顾,并在整合科学制图技术的同时分析了障碍。使用Scopus、ScienceDirect和Web of Science数据库,使用科学制图识别和分析了154个相关书目记录,同时系统地审查了40份精心挑选的相关出版物。根据审查,确定的前五大障碍包括知识水平低、技术接受度低、缺乏明确的DT价值主张、项目复杂性和建筑数据的静态性质。结果显示,英国、中国、美国和德国是CI中率先采用DT的国家,而只有来自澳大利亚、英国、阿尔及利亚和希腊的少数机构建立了DT研究的机构合作。在30个已确定障碍的基础上制定了一个概念框架,以支持DT采用路线图。该框架的主要类别包括利益相关者导向、行业相关、建筑企业相关和技术相关的障碍。已确定的障碍和框架将指导和拓宽DT的知识,这对建筑行业的成功采用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Informatics
Informatics Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Simulation of discrete control systems with parallelism of behavior Formal description model and conditions for detecting linked coupling faults of the memory devices A model of homographs automatic identification for the Belarusian language Ontological analysis in the problems of container applications threat modelling Closed Gordon – Newell network with single-line poles and exponentially limited request waiting time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1