Covid-19 Crisis: Government's (Dis)Trust In The People And Pitfalls of Liberal Democracies

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Partecipazione e Conflitto Pub Date : 2021-06-24 DOI:10.1285/i20356609v14i1p152
Marija Sniečkutė, Inga Gaižauskatė
{"title":"Covid-19 Crisis: Government's (Dis)Trust In The People And Pitfalls of Liberal Democracies","authors":"Marija Sniečkutė, Inga Gaižauskatė","doi":"10.1285/i20356609v14i1p152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 crisis highlighted the issue of trust in European democracies. Governments had to both undertake (unprecedented) restrictive measures to manage the spread of COVID-19 and to rely on citizens' willingness to adhere to these measures. Scientific works on political trust generally focus on people's trust in government and stress its centrality during the crisis. Public opinion surveys, conducted during the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, reported fluctuating levels of people's trust in national governments. However, it is as important to ask how government constructs trust, including in its own people. In the article, we aim to focus on the latter aspect of political trust in order to highlight the role of trust in such crises as pandemic, and draw evaluative implications for democratic arrangements. Using discourse analysis, we look at how the Prime Ministers (PMs) of three European countries (Hungary, Lithuania, and the Netherlands) articulated (dis)trust as well as constructed images of \"Us\" in their public speeches informing respective societies about the COVID-19 situation. In PMs' speeches (dis)trust is articulated along a \"trust-control\" continuum, and we identified distinctive patterns of the \"Us\" vs. \"Them\" construction.","PeriodicalId":45168,"journal":{"name":"Partecipazione e Conflitto","volume":"14 1","pages":"152-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partecipazione e Conflitto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v14i1p152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 crisis highlighted the issue of trust in European democracies. Governments had to both undertake (unprecedented) restrictive measures to manage the spread of COVID-19 and to rely on citizens' willingness to adhere to these measures. Scientific works on political trust generally focus on people's trust in government and stress its centrality during the crisis. Public opinion surveys, conducted during the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, reported fluctuating levels of people's trust in national governments. However, it is as important to ask how government constructs trust, including in its own people. In the article, we aim to focus on the latter aspect of political trust in order to highlight the role of trust in such crises as pandemic, and draw evaluative implications for democratic arrangements. Using discourse analysis, we look at how the Prime Ministers (PMs) of three European countries (Hungary, Lithuania, and the Netherlands) articulated (dis)trust as well as constructed images of "Us" in their public speeches informing respective societies about the COVID-19 situation. In PMs' speeches (dis)trust is articulated along a "trust-control" continuum, and we identified distinctive patterns of the "Us" vs. "Them" construction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎危机:政府对人民的信任与自由民主政体的缺陷
新冠肺炎危机凸显了对欧洲民主国家的信任问题。各国政府必须采取(前所未有的)限制性措施来控制COVID-19的传播,并依靠公民的意愿来遵守这些措施。政治信任的科学研究一般关注民众对政府的信任,并强调其在危机中的中心地位。在2019冠状病毒病大流行初期进行的民意调查显示,人们对国家政府的信任水平波动。然而,同样重要的是要问政府如何建立信任,包括对自己人民的信任。在本文中,我们的目标是关注政治信任的后一个方面,以突出信任在诸如流行病等危机中的作用,并得出对民主安排的评价意义。通过话语分析,我们研究了三个欧洲国家(匈牙利、立陶宛和荷兰)的总理如何在向各自社会通报COVID-19形势的公开演讲中表达(不信任)以及构建“我们”的形象。在总理的演讲中,信任是沿着“信任-控制”连续体表达的,我们确定了“我们”对“我们”的独特模式。“他们”建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Partecipazione e Conflitto
Partecipazione e Conflitto POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: PArtecipazione e COnflitto [PArticipation and COnflict] is an International Journal based in Italy specialized in social and political studies. PACO houses research and studies on the transformations of politics and its key players (political parties, interest groups, social movements, associations, unions, etc.), focusing in particular on the dynamics of participation both by individuals acting in conventional ways, and by those who prefer protest-oriented repertoires of action. Special attention is also paid to the dynamics of transformation of contemporary political systems, with an eye fixed on the processes of democratization besides on the spaces opening to the new forms of governance both at local and sub-national, and supra-national level. All are inscribed in that complex phenomenon represented by the trans-nationalization of social, political and economic processes, without neglecting the nation-state dimension. The journal emphasizes innovative studies and research of high methodological rigor, treasuring of the most recent theoretical and empirical contributions in social and political sciences.
期刊最新文献
Community-Led Housing in Yangon: The Struggles of Non-Confrontational Resistance and Feminist Crisis Management The Xi'an Schizophrenia Imaging Lab (SIL) data and ten years of MRI study on schizophrenia. Overcoming the limits of EMU through Covid? Next Generation EU against the unaddressed needs for ambitious structural reform The Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome (Re)Creating "Society in Silico": Surveillance Capitalism, Simulations and Subjectivity in the Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1