Analyse des prélèvements biologiques médico-légaux : quel cadre juridique à l’ère de la qualité?

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL Medecine & Droit Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.meddro.2021.02.003
P. Henry , F. Paysant , H. Fricker-Hidalgo , O. Cognet , H. Pelloux , V. Scolan
{"title":"Analyse des prélèvements biologiques médico-légaux : quel cadre juridique à l’ère de la qualité?","authors":"P. Henry ,&nbsp;F. Paysant ,&nbsp;H. Fricker-Hidalgo ,&nbsp;O. Cognet ,&nbsp;H. Pelloux ,&nbsp;V. Scolan","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2021.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Medico-legal autopsy sometimes requires the use of the Parasitology-Mycology specialty. Two recent medico-legal clinical cases, involving this specialty, have questioned us. First of all, may a non-conformity biological analytical (compared to accepted and accredited standards by COFRAC) fail the whole biological expertise, and thereafter, the medico-legal expertise of the file? The answer must consider that the raw result obtained as a result of a medical biology technique must be interpreted and discussed by the expert in the discipline (in this case by the parasitologist) before being included in the medical discussion and discussed by the medical examiner. The judgment is secondarily delivered by the judge according to his intimate conviction and without determining the probative value of the examination. Should a post-mortem biological examination be part of an expertise in medical biology or is it a technical and scientific examination? This answer is based on the previous one, considering the significant contribution of the expert who will bring his knowledge, interpreting and discussing the raw result. A simple technical and scientific examination would only provide the raw result without any assessment of the context and circumstances of the biological sample.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2021 170","pages":"Pages 98-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.meddro.2021.02.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739121000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medico-legal autopsy sometimes requires the use of the Parasitology-Mycology specialty. Two recent medico-legal clinical cases, involving this specialty, have questioned us. First of all, may a non-conformity biological analytical (compared to accepted and accredited standards by COFRAC) fail the whole biological expertise, and thereafter, the medico-legal expertise of the file? The answer must consider that the raw result obtained as a result of a medical biology technique must be interpreted and discussed by the expert in the discipline (in this case by the parasitologist) before being included in the medical discussion and discussed by the medical examiner. The judgment is secondarily delivered by the judge according to his intimate conviction and without determining the probative value of the examination. Should a post-mortem biological examination be part of an expertise in medical biology or is it a technical and scientific examination? This answer is based on the previous one, considering the significant contribution of the expert who will bring his knowledge, interpreting and discussing the raw result. A simple technical and scientific examination would only provide the raw result without any assessment of the context and circumstances of the biological sample.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法医生物样本分析:质量时代的法律框架是什么?
法医解剖有时需要使用寄生虫学-真菌学专业。最近两起涉及这一专业的医学法律临床案例对我们提出了质疑。首先,不符合标准的生物分析(与COFRAC接受和认可的标准相比)是否可以通过整个生物专业知识,然后是文件的医学法律专业知识?答案必须考虑到,通过医学生物学技术获得的原始结果必须由该学科的专家(在这种情况下由寄生虫学家)解释和讨论,然后才能纳入医学讨论并由法医讨论。判决书是由法官根据自己的信念作出的,而不决定考试的证明价值。死后生物检验应该是医学生物学专业知识的一部分,还是一种技术和科学检验?这个答案是基于前一个,考虑到专家将带来他的知识,解释和讨论原始结果的重大贡献。简单的技术和科学检查只能提供原始结果,而不会对生物样本的背景和情况进行任何评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medecine & Droit
Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues
期刊最新文献
Contents Contents Parcours de soins rénové, e-santé et maillage officinal : une réponse complexe à la pénurie de médecins Le concept de race : serpent de mer de la pratique médicale La loi du 10 mai 2024 contre les dérives sectaires : application dans le domaine de la santé : séparer le bon grain scientifique de l’ivraie charlatanesque
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1