Adolescents’ perceptions of long-term effects of cycle skills training

IF 0.4 Q4 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Road Safety-JRS Pub Date : 2022-11-09 DOI:10.33492/jrs-d-22-00031
S. Mandic, Charlotte Flaherty, J. Mindell, Enrique Garía Bengoechea
{"title":"Adolescents’ perceptions of long-term effects of cycle skills training","authors":"S. Mandic, Charlotte Flaherty, J. Mindell, Enrique Garía Bengoechea","doi":"10.33492/jrs-d-22-00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cycling to school is uncommon among adolescents in most developed countries. Development of cycling skills through cycle skills training (CST) can reduce cycling-related safety concerns. This study examined long-term effects of CST retrospectively by comparing adolescents’ perceptions of cycling to school and their confidence to cycle to school among those who participated in CST in primary and/or intermediate school with non-participants. Adolescents (n=1,260; 51% female; 12 schools) from Dunedin (New Zealand) completed an online survey at school. Adolescents self-reported transport modes to school, perceptions of cycling to school and CST, and previous participation in and perceived benefits of school-based CST programmes. Only 1-2% adolescents usually cycled to school. Overall, 42% agreed CST would make them safer in traffic (no significant difference between CST participants (n=512) and non-participants (n=748)). Among CST participants, 32% reported that CST increased their confidence to cycle to school and those adolescents had more favourable attitudes towards CST than participants who reported no effects. In a multivariable analysis, adolescents’ perceptions that CST increased their cycling confidence were positively associated with self-efficacy for cycling to school (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 1.33 (1.07, 1.67)), perceived school support (1.51 (1.01, 2.25)), parental cycling-related safety concerns (1.84 (1.25, 2.69)) and being Māori (6.47 (2.36, 17.7)) or other ethnic origins (2.26 (1.00, 5.10); reference: New Zealand Europeans). Therefore, CST could be a useful strategy to support adolescents’ cycling to school, ideally (as suggested in the literature) in combination with appropriate infrastructure changes and speed management measures.","PeriodicalId":53198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Road Safety-JRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33492/jrs-d-22-00031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cycling to school is uncommon among adolescents in most developed countries. Development of cycling skills through cycle skills training (CST) can reduce cycling-related safety concerns. This study examined long-term effects of CST retrospectively by comparing adolescents’ perceptions of cycling to school and their confidence to cycle to school among those who participated in CST in primary and/or intermediate school with non-participants. Adolescents (n=1,260; 51% female; 12 schools) from Dunedin (New Zealand) completed an online survey at school. Adolescents self-reported transport modes to school, perceptions of cycling to school and CST, and previous participation in and perceived benefits of school-based CST programmes. Only 1-2% adolescents usually cycled to school. Overall, 42% agreed CST would make them safer in traffic (no significant difference between CST participants (n=512) and non-participants (n=748)). Among CST participants, 32% reported that CST increased their confidence to cycle to school and those adolescents had more favourable attitudes towards CST than participants who reported no effects. In a multivariable analysis, adolescents’ perceptions that CST increased their cycling confidence were positively associated with self-efficacy for cycling to school (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 1.33 (1.07, 1.67)), perceived school support (1.51 (1.01, 2.25)), parental cycling-related safety concerns (1.84 (1.25, 2.69)) and being Māori (6.47 (2.36, 17.7)) or other ethnic origins (2.26 (1.00, 5.10); reference: New Zealand Europeans). Therefore, CST could be a useful strategy to support adolescents’ cycling to school, ideally (as suggested in the literature) in combination with appropriate infrastructure changes and speed management measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年对循环技能训练长期效果的认知
在大多数发达国家,骑车上学在青少年中并不常见。通过骑行技能培训(CST)发展骑行技能可以减少与骑行相关的安全问题。本研究回顾性地考察了骑车上学的长期影响,比较了在小学和/或中学参加骑车上学的青少年和未参加骑车上学的青少年对骑车上学的看法和信心。青少年(n = 1260;51%的女性;来自达尼丁(新西兰)的12所学校在学校完成了一项在线调查。青少年自我报告了上学的交通方式,对骑车上学和社区服务的看法,以及以前参加过的以学校为基础的社区服务项目和所感受到的好处。只有1-2%的青少年通常骑车上学。总体而言,42%的人认为CST会使他们在交通中更安全(CST参与者(n=512)和非参与者(n=748)之间没有显著差异)。在参加CST的青少年中,32%的人报告说CST增加了他们骑车上学的信心,这些青少年对CST的态度比没有报告影响的青少年更有利。在多变量分析中,青少年认为CST提高了他们的骑车信心与骑车上学的自我效能感呈正相关(优势比(OR)(95%置信区间(CI)): 1.33(1.07, 1.67)),感知学校支持(1.51(1.01,2.25)),父母骑车相关的安全担忧(1.84(1.25,2.69))和Māori(6.47(2.36, 17.7))或其他种族(2.26 (1.00,5.10);参考文献:新西兰欧洲人)。因此,CST可能是支持青少年骑自行车上学的一个有用的策略,理想情况下(如文献所建议的)与适当的基础设施变化和速度管理措施相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Road Safety-JRS
Journal of Road Safety-JRS TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
How Do Young Provisional Drivers Who Crash Early Compare With Those Who Only Crash Later? Readability of Australian Road Safety Information for the General Public Auckland Transport’s Mass Action Pedestrian Improvement Programme Driving for Work Crashes: A Systems Analysis Insights Into Wire Rope Safety Barrier Crashes Based on Police-Reported Statistics and Narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1