Can Bike-Sharing Reduce Car Use in Alexandroupolis? An Exploration through the Comparison of Discrete Choice and Machine Learning Models

IF 7 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC Smart Cities Pub Date : 2023-04-30 DOI:10.3390/smartcities6030060
Santhanakrishnan Narayanan, Nikita Makarov, Evripidis Magkos, Josep Maria Salanova Grau, G. Aifadopoulou, C. Antoniou
{"title":"Can Bike-Sharing Reduce Car Use in Alexandroupolis? An Exploration through the Comparison of Discrete Choice and Machine Learning Models","authors":"Santhanakrishnan Narayanan, Nikita Makarov, Evripidis Magkos, Josep Maria Salanova Grau, G. Aifadopoulou, C. Antoniou","doi":"10.3390/smartcities6030060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of bike-sharing systems (BSSs) is expected to lead to modifications in the travel habits of transport users, one of which is the choice of travel mode. Therefore, this research focuses on the identification of factors influencing the shift of private car users to BSSs based on stated preference survey data from the city of Alexandroupolis, Greece. A binary logit model is employed for this purpose. The estimation results indicate the impacts of gender, income, travel time, travel cost and safety-related aspects on the mode shift, through which behavioural insights are derived. For example, car users are found to be twice as sensitive to the cost of BSSs than to that of car. Similarly, they are highly sensitive to BSS travel time. Based on the behavioural findings, policy measures are suggested under the following categories: (i) finance, (ii) regulation, (iii) infrastructure, (iv) campaigns and (v) customer targeting. In addition, a secondary objective of this research is to obtain insights from the comparison of the specified logit model with a machine learning approach, as the latter is slowly gaining prominence in the field of transport. For the comparison, a random forest classifier is also developed. This comparison shows a coherence between the two approaches, although a discrepancy in the feature importance for gender and travel time is observed. A deeper exploration of this discrepancy highlights the hurdles that often occur when using mathematically more powerful models, such as the random forest classifier.","PeriodicalId":34482,"journal":{"name":"Smart Cities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6030060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The implementation of bike-sharing systems (BSSs) is expected to lead to modifications in the travel habits of transport users, one of which is the choice of travel mode. Therefore, this research focuses on the identification of factors influencing the shift of private car users to BSSs based on stated preference survey data from the city of Alexandroupolis, Greece. A binary logit model is employed for this purpose. The estimation results indicate the impacts of gender, income, travel time, travel cost and safety-related aspects on the mode shift, through which behavioural insights are derived. For example, car users are found to be twice as sensitive to the cost of BSSs than to that of car. Similarly, they are highly sensitive to BSS travel time. Based on the behavioural findings, policy measures are suggested under the following categories: (i) finance, (ii) regulation, (iii) infrastructure, (iv) campaigns and (v) customer targeting. In addition, a secondary objective of this research is to obtain insights from the comparison of the specified logit model with a machine learning approach, as the latter is slowly gaining prominence in the field of transport. For the comparison, a random forest classifier is also developed. This comparison shows a coherence between the two approaches, although a discrepancy in the feature importance for gender and travel time is observed. A deeper exploration of this discrepancy highlights the hurdles that often occur when using mathematically more powerful models, such as the random forest classifier.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享单车能减少亚历山德鲁波利斯的汽车使用量吗?通过比较离散选择和机器学习模型的探索
共享单车系统的实施预计将改变交通用户的出行习惯,其中之一就是出行方式的选择。因此,本研究基于希腊亚历山德鲁波利斯市的既定偏好调查数据,重点确定影响私家车用户转向BSS的因素。为此采用了二进制logit模型。估计结果表明,性别、收入、旅行时间、旅行成本和安全相关方面对模式转变的影响,从而得出行为见解。例如,汽车用户对BSS成本的敏感度是汽车成本的两倍。同样,它们对BSS旅行时间高度敏感。根据行为调查结果,建议在以下类别下采取政策措施:(i)金融,(ii)监管,(iii)基础设施,(iv)活动和(v)客户定位。此外,这项研究的第二个目标是通过将指定的logit模型与机器学习方法进行比较来获得见解,因为后者在交通领域正慢慢崭露头角。为了进行比较,还开发了一个随机森林分类器。这一比较显示了两种方法之间的一致性,尽管观察到特征对性别和旅行时间的重要性存在差异。对这种差异的深入探索突显了在使用数学上更强大的模型(如随机森林分类器)时经常出现的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Smart Cities
Smart Cities Multiple-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Smart Cities (ISSN 2624-6511) provides an advanced forum for the dissemination of information on the science and technology of smart cities, publishing reviews, regular research papers (articles) and communications in all areas of research concerning smart cities. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible, with no restriction on the maximum length of the papers published so that all experimental results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Vision-Based Object Localization and Classification for Electric Vehicle Driving Assistance Smart Grid Resilience for Grid-Connected PV and Protection Systems under Cyber Threats Tech Giants’ Responsible Innovation and Technology Strategy: An International Policy Review Grid Impact of Wastewater Resource Recovery Facilities-Based Community Microgrids Development of a Microservice-Based Storm Sewer Simulation System with IoT Devices for Early Warning in Urban Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1