{"title":"Why Learn Artistic Thought?","authors":"J. Kettel","doi":"10.17561/rtc.extra6.6539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My presentation collage looks at image productions that were individually (but also collectively) developed by my students within the concept of art education during their studies for a degree in Art Education. This is combined with the search for the semantic content of the terms \"thought\", \"aesthetic thought\" and \"artistic thought\". Where these aspects are concerned, I am interested in the question as to how artistic art education differs from other concepts. On the one hand, other concepts eliminate the mediation of art because there is apparently nothing to learn and therefore nothing to teach about art (see Ehmer et al.) but on the other hand, they legitimise the existence of art lessons in schools by reducing them to display procedures focusing on image analysis and/or the pragmatic examination of images (Bering, Niehoff et al.) or favour the everyday aesthetic experiences of children and young people without reaching more in-depth and independent transformational processes as a result. The ultimate question that needs to be asked is what are the educational potentials and methods of art education that focuses on training artistic thought?\n“If you don't want to think, you're out!” (himself) (Joseph Beuys, 1977, documenta 6 in Kassel, Germany) (Image: Beuys card)","PeriodicalId":40673,"journal":{"name":"Tercio Creciente","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tercio Creciente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17561/rtc.extra6.6539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
My presentation collage looks at image productions that were individually (but also collectively) developed by my students within the concept of art education during their studies for a degree in Art Education. This is combined with the search for the semantic content of the terms "thought", "aesthetic thought" and "artistic thought". Where these aspects are concerned, I am interested in the question as to how artistic art education differs from other concepts. On the one hand, other concepts eliminate the mediation of art because there is apparently nothing to learn and therefore nothing to teach about art (see Ehmer et al.) but on the other hand, they legitimise the existence of art lessons in schools by reducing them to display procedures focusing on image analysis and/or the pragmatic examination of images (Bering, Niehoff et al.) or favour the everyday aesthetic experiences of children and young people without reaching more in-depth and independent transformational processes as a result. The ultimate question that needs to be asked is what are the educational potentials and methods of art education that focuses on training artistic thought?
“If you don't want to think, you're out!” (himself) (Joseph Beuys, 1977, documenta 6 in Kassel, Germany) (Image: Beuys card)
我的展示拼贴着眼于我的学生在攻读艺术教育学位期间,在艺术教育概念范围内单独(但也集体)开发的图像作品。这与寻找“思想”、“美学思想”和“艺术思想”三个术语的语义内容相结合。就这些方面而言,我感兴趣的是艺术教育与其他概念有何不同。一方面,其他概念消除了艺术的中介作用,因为关于艺术显然没有什么可学的,因此也没有什么可教的(见Ehmer等人),但另一方面,他们通过将艺术课简化为专注于图像分析和/或图像的语用检查的展示程序,使学校中艺术课的存在合法化(Bering,Niehoff et al.),或者倾向于儿童和年轻人的日常审美体验,而没有达到更深入和独立的转变过程。需要问的终极问题是,以培养艺术思维为核心的艺术教育的教育潜力和方法是什么?“如果你不想思考,你就出局了!”(他自己)(约瑟夫·博伊斯,1977年,德国卡塞尔纪录片6)(图片:博伊斯卡片)