{"title":"Confession and the Cultural Turn: Revising the Historical Critique of Lídia Jorge’s The Murmuring Coast","authors":"Frans Weiser","doi":"10.21471/JLS.V3I2.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lídia Jorge’s A costa dos murmúrios (1988) has been primarily theorized as a subversion of historical discourse. Similar to a number of Jorge’s examinations of social changes emerging as the Estado Novo declined, the novel juxtaposes two competing versions of the past, in this case a fictional representation of the colonial wars and a woman’s testimonial account twenty years later. This article reconsiders the novel’s status as historical deconstruction, arguing that its oral and visual strategies instead correspond to the methodology of cultural historiography that emerged during the 1970s and 1980s. Expanding Helena Kaufman’s reading of the testimonial as “deliterarization,” I analyze how a slippage of critical terminology over time has equated historical fiction with narrative history. After examining the competing agendas of cultural history and literary postmodernism, I demonstrate how reconceiving Jorge’s historical “annulment” as a productive revision of fiction provides a model of complementary history facilitating interdisciplinary engagement.","PeriodicalId":52257,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lusophone Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lusophone Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21471/JLS.V3I2.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lídia Jorge’s A costa dos murmúrios (1988) has been primarily theorized as a subversion of historical discourse. Similar to a number of Jorge’s examinations of social changes emerging as the Estado Novo declined, the novel juxtaposes two competing versions of the past, in this case a fictional representation of the colonial wars and a woman’s testimonial account twenty years later. This article reconsiders the novel’s status as historical deconstruction, arguing that its oral and visual strategies instead correspond to the methodology of cultural historiography that emerged during the 1970s and 1980s. Expanding Helena Kaufman’s reading of the testimonial as “deliterarization,” I analyze how a slippage of critical terminology over time has equated historical fiction with narrative history. After examining the competing agendas of cultural history and literary postmodernism, I demonstrate how reconceiving Jorge’s historical “annulment” as a productive revision of fiction provides a model of complementary history facilitating interdisciplinary engagement.
Lídia Jorge的A costa dos murmúrios(1988)主要被理论化为对历史话语的颠覆。与豪尔赫对新国家衰落时出现的社会变化的一些考察类似,这本小说将过去的两个相互竞争的版本并列在一起,在这种情况下,一个是殖民战争的虚构表现,另一个是20年后一位妇女的见证。本文重新考虑小说作为历史解构主义的地位,认为其口头和视觉策略与20世纪70年代和80年代出现的文化史学方法论相对应。扩展海伦娜·考夫曼(Helena Kaufman)对证言的解读为“去iterarization”,我分析了随着时间的推移,批评术语的滑落如何将历史小说与叙事历史等同起来。在考察了文化史和文学后现代主义的相互竞争的议程之后,我展示了如何将乔治的历史“废除”重新视为小说的富有成效的修订,为促进跨学科参与提供了一个互补的历史模型。