Simultaneous and synchronous bilateral endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis: a multicentric study

O. Angerri, O. Mayordomo, A. Kanashiro, F. Millán-Rodríguez, F. Sánchez-Martín, S. Cho, Eran Schreter, M. Sofer, Saeed Bin-Hamri, A. Alasker, Y. Tanidir, T. E. Şener, P. Kalidonis, J. Palou-Redorta, E. Emiliani
{"title":"Simultaneous and synchronous bilateral endoscopic treatment of urolithiasis: a multicentric study","authors":"O. Angerri, O. Mayordomo, A. Kanashiro, F. Millán-Rodríguez, F. Sánchez-Martín, S. Cho, Eran Schreter, M. Sofer, Saeed Bin-Hamri, A. Alasker, Y. Tanidir, T. E. Şener, P. Kalidonis, J. Palou-Redorta, E. Emiliani","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2019.1862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The general prevalence of bilateral urolithiasis has risen to 15% and bilateral non-simultaneous treatment has been reported to have good outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery (SBES). Material and methods An international multicenter analysis was performed between May 2015 and December 2017. All patients with bilateral stone disease that underwent SBES were included. Patients were treated under general anesthesia in either the supine or lithotomy position. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Results A total of 47 patients were included. Mean age was 53.8 years and 70% of the patients were males. The mean American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score was 2. The mean diameter of right- and left-sided stones was 29.43 mm (2–83 mm) and 31.15 (4–102 mm), respectively. Staghorn stones were treated in 18 cases (8 right-sided and 10 left-sided), four of them were defined as complete staghorn. The procedures performed were 42 cases of bilateral URS and PCNL and ureteroscopy. Additionally, 5 bilateral flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) cases were described. Intraoperative complications occurred in five patients: four of them were classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) I and one as CD II. Postoperatively, there were two cases with CD I, 6 with CD II and one CD IIIa. The stone-free status was 70%. Residual stones (30%) were detected only on the side treated for high-volume (complete) staghorn calculi. Conclusions SBES is a feasible, effective and safe procedure. It may potentially avoid repeated anesthetic sessions as needed for staged procedures and reduce the length of patients' hospital stay.","PeriodicalId":86295,"journal":{"name":"Urologia polska","volume":"72 1","pages":"178 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction The general prevalence of bilateral urolithiasis has risen to 15% and bilateral non-simultaneous treatment has been reported to have good outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery (SBES). Material and methods An international multicenter analysis was performed between May 2015 and December 2017. All patients with bilateral stone disease that underwent SBES were included. Patients were treated under general anesthesia in either the supine or lithotomy position. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Results A total of 47 patients were included. Mean age was 53.8 years and 70% of the patients were males. The mean American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score was 2. The mean diameter of right- and left-sided stones was 29.43 mm (2–83 mm) and 31.15 (4–102 mm), respectively. Staghorn stones were treated in 18 cases (8 right-sided and 10 left-sided), four of them were defined as complete staghorn. The procedures performed were 42 cases of bilateral URS and PCNL and ureteroscopy. Additionally, 5 bilateral flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) cases were described. Intraoperative complications occurred in five patients: four of them were classified as Clavien-Dindo (CD) I and one as CD II. Postoperatively, there were two cases with CD I, 6 with CD II and one CD IIIa. The stone-free status was 70%. Residual stones (30%) were detected only on the side treated for high-volume (complete) staghorn calculi. Conclusions SBES is a feasible, effective and safe procedure. It may potentially avoid repeated anesthetic sessions as needed for staged procedures and reduce the length of patients' hospital stay.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时和同步双侧内镜治疗尿石症:一项多中心研究
引言双侧尿石症的总患病率已上升至15%,据报道双侧非同时治疗效果良好。本研究的目的是评估同时进行双侧内窥镜手术(SBES)的有效性和安全性。材料和方法2015年5月至2017年12月进行了一项国际多中心分析。所有接受SBES治疗的双侧结石患者均包括在内。患者在全麻下采用仰卧位或切开取石位进行治疗。对人口统计学、临床、术中和术后数据进行分析。结果共纳入47例患者。平均年龄53.8岁,70%的患者为男性。美国麻醉学学会(ASA)的平均评分为2。右侧和左侧结石的平均直径分别为29.43 mm(2-83 mm)和31.15 mm(4-102 mm)。治疗鹿角形结石18例(右侧8例,左侧10例),其中4例被定义为完全鹿角形结石。所进行的手术包括42例双侧输尿管镜、PCNL和输尿管镜检查。此外,还描述了5例双侧柔性输尿管镜(fURS)病例。术中并发症发生在5例患者中:其中4例为Clavien-Dindo(CD)I,1例为CD II。术后CDⅠ2例,CDⅡ6例,CDⅢa 1例。无结石状态为70%。残余结石(30%)仅在接受大容量(完全)鹿角形结石治疗的一侧检测到。结论SBES是一种可行、有效、安全的手术方法。它可能会避免分期手术所需的重复麻醉,并缩短患者的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choosing a path for CEJU Location of ureteral access sheath in the ureter. Does it affect the fluid flow in different calyces? A new era and future of education: the impact of pandemic on online learning - a study from the European School of Urology. Spermatic vein thrombosis as a rare cause of testicular pain - review of the literature. Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1