Lynn Keets, Pedro Boscan, Logan Arakaki, Benjamin Schraeder, Cyane Tornatzky, Marie Vans, Wenjing Jiang, Sangeeta Rao
{"title":"Interactive Virtual Reality with Educational Feedback Loops to Train and Assess Veterinary Students on the Use of Anesthetic Machine.","authors":"Lynn Keets, Pedro Boscan, Logan Arakaki, Benjamin Schraeder, Cyane Tornatzky, Marie Vans, Wenjing Jiang, Sangeeta Rao","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2022-0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study objective was to assess acceptability, feasibility, likeability, and applicability of interactive virtual reality with feedback loops (VR) to teach and assess veterinary anesthesia machine operation. Data from 60 students were analyzed. Students learned and trained how to use the anesthesia machine components and connections and performed safety checks (such as the pressure check) using real and VR machines. Competency was assessed with oral/practical and VR exams. A questionnaire survey gathered student affective skill perception toward VR for education. Students perceived VR for veterinary education as positive, useful, likeable, and helpful to learn the anesthesia machine. VR appeared to increase cognitive load, inducing lower VR exam scores of 100 (92.4-97.9) when compared to oral/practical exams of 100 (98-99.8) with <i>p</i> = .018. Training times with either real or VR anesthesia machines were similar (<i>p</i> = .71). A positive correlation was found between VR training times and VR exam scores (Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.5; <i>p</i> < .001). No correlations were identified between oral/practical exam scores and training times. Seventy two percent of the students (<i>n</i> = 43) had never used VR before. Prior VR experience was not necessary to train using VR. Computer glitches and cybersickness are important drawbacks to consider when using VR for education. The study demonstrated that interactive, immersive VR received favorable reactions from students. The VR incorporated educational feedback loops can be utilized as a simulation trainer for veterinary education. However, inherent limitations should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2022-0140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study objective was to assess acceptability, feasibility, likeability, and applicability of interactive virtual reality with feedback loops (VR) to teach and assess veterinary anesthesia machine operation. Data from 60 students were analyzed. Students learned and trained how to use the anesthesia machine components and connections and performed safety checks (such as the pressure check) using real and VR machines. Competency was assessed with oral/practical and VR exams. A questionnaire survey gathered student affective skill perception toward VR for education. Students perceived VR for veterinary education as positive, useful, likeable, and helpful to learn the anesthesia machine. VR appeared to increase cognitive load, inducing lower VR exam scores of 100 (92.4-97.9) when compared to oral/practical exams of 100 (98-99.8) with p = .018. Training times with either real or VR anesthesia machines were similar (p = .71). A positive correlation was found between VR training times and VR exam scores (Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.5; p < .001). No correlations were identified between oral/practical exam scores and training times. Seventy two percent of the students (n = 43) had never used VR before. Prior VR experience was not necessary to train using VR. Computer glitches and cybersickness are important drawbacks to consider when using VR for education. The study demonstrated that interactive, immersive VR received favorable reactions from students. The VR incorporated educational feedback loops can be utilized as a simulation trainer for veterinary education. However, inherent limitations should be considered.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society.
The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.