A ’metabolic bundle‘ including Oxandrolone in optimising the metabolic status of severely burn injured patients: a retrospective analysis of the first 50 patients

H. Taha, Björn Steinke, H. Fischer, M. Malcharek, T. Kremer, J. Gille
{"title":"A ’metabolic bundle‘ including Oxandrolone in optimising the metabolic status of severely burn injured patients: a retrospective analysis of the first 50 patients","authors":"H. Taha, Björn Steinke, H. Fischer, M. Malcharek, T. Kremer, J. Gille","doi":"10.3205/iprs000143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Severe burn injuries are associated with a rapid escalating hypermetabolic state and catabolism of muscle mass. To ameliorate this process a standardized approach using pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions was implemented within a single burns center. Whilst individual components of this standardized package are well documented in the literature, their collective or bundled effect has not as yet been assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this standardized bundle of metabolic modulators and assess the safety of including the anabolic steroid oxandrolone within it. Methods: This retrospective observational study constituted all patients in whom the metabolic bundle including oxandrolone therapy was applied. The other elements of the metabolic bundle consisted of early surgical burn excision within seven days to completion, early active mobilization, increased ambient room temperature, expediated carbohydrate and protein rich enteral feeding with glutamine and trace element supplements (such as copper and zinc). Finally, administration of propranolol as a non-selective beta-blocker. Data collection was through review of the patient data management system focusing on the outcome criteria and hepatic blood values. Results: The study looked at fifty consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Median patient age and burned total body surface area (TBSA) were 62 years [51.75; 73] and 33.75% [24.75; 51] respectively with an abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) of 10 [9; 10.25]. Definitive surgical burn wound excision was completed in 44 patients [88%] within 7 days. 39 patients (78%) received propranolol over a therapeutic period of 29 days [19; 44]. Glutamine was supplemented in 45 patients (90%), while zinc and copper were applied to 42 (84%) and 31 (62%) respectively. Significant low zinc values were noted at therapeutic onset (6.5 mmol/l [4.7; 7.9]) requiring sustained substitution over 37.5 days [22; 46.75]). In respect of the inclusion criteria, all patients received oxandrolone at 20 mg/day [20; 20]. This was commenced on day 6.5 [4; 14] post burn injury and continued over 26 days [19; 31]. Despite a transitory elevation of hepatic enzyme values (ALT, GGT), these were only clinically relevant (>10 µmol/l*S) in 2.4% and 4.6% of all measurements respectively. None were sufficiently of concern to merit cessation of treatment. Conclusion: The application of a standardised bundle of metabolic treatment options of severe burns injured patients is reliable, repeatable and safe. Potential concerns of oxandrolone treatment regarding hepatic compromise remain unfounded.","PeriodicalId":43347,"journal":{"name":"GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Severe burn injuries are associated with a rapid escalating hypermetabolic state and catabolism of muscle mass. To ameliorate this process a standardized approach using pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions was implemented within a single burns center. Whilst individual components of this standardized package are well documented in the literature, their collective or bundled effect has not as yet been assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this standardized bundle of metabolic modulators and assess the safety of including the anabolic steroid oxandrolone within it. Methods: This retrospective observational study constituted all patients in whom the metabolic bundle including oxandrolone therapy was applied. The other elements of the metabolic bundle consisted of early surgical burn excision within seven days to completion, early active mobilization, increased ambient room temperature, expediated carbohydrate and protein rich enteral feeding with glutamine and trace element supplements (such as copper and zinc). Finally, administration of propranolol as a non-selective beta-blocker. Data collection was through review of the patient data management system focusing on the outcome criteria and hepatic blood values. Results: The study looked at fifty consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Median patient age and burned total body surface area (TBSA) were 62 years [51.75; 73] and 33.75% [24.75; 51] respectively with an abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) of 10 [9; 10.25]. Definitive surgical burn wound excision was completed in 44 patients [88%] within 7 days. 39 patients (78%) received propranolol over a therapeutic period of 29 days [19; 44]. Glutamine was supplemented in 45 patients (90%), while zinc and copper were applied to 42 (84%) and 31 (62%) respectively. Significant low zinc values were noted at therapeutic onset (6.5 mmol/l [4.7; 7.9]) requiring sustained substitution over 37.5 days [22; 46.75]). In respect of the inclusion criteria, all patients received oxandrolone at 20 mg/day [20; 20]. This was commenced on day 6.5 [4; 14] post burn injury and continued over 26 days [19; 31]. Despite a transitory elevation of hepatic enzyme values (ALT, GGT), these were only clinically relevant (>10 µmol/l*S) in 2.4% and 4.6% of all measurements respectively. None were sufficiently of concern to merit cessation of treatment. Conclusion: The application of a standardised bundle of metabolic treatment options of severe burns injured patients is reliable, repeatable and safe. Potential concerns of oxandrolone treatment regarding hepatic compromise remain unfounded.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包括奥雄龙在内的“代谢束”优化严重烧伤患者的代谢状态:对前50名患者的回顾性分析
目的:严重烧伤与快速升级的高代谢状态和肌肉的分解代谢有关。为了改善这一过程,在一个烧伤中心实施了使用药理学和非药理学干预的标准化方法。虽然这一标准化方案的个别组成部分在文献中有很好的记录,但它们的集体或捆绑效应尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是评估这种标准化代谢调节剂束的疗效,并评估在其中加入合成代谢类固醇奥雄龙的安全性。方法:本研究为回顾性观察性研究,纳入所有采用含奥胺龙治疗的代谢束治疗的患者。代谢束的其他组成部分包括:烧伤术后7天内早期手术切除、早期主动活动、提高环境室温、加快含谷氨酰胺和微量元素补充剂(如铜和锌)的富含碳水化合物和蛋白质的肠内喂养。最后,将心得安作为非选择性阻滞剂。通过审查患者数据管理系统收集数据,重点关注结果标准和肝血值。结果:该研究观察了50例符合纳入标准的连续患者。患者中位年龄和烧伤总体表面积(TBSA)为62岁[51.75;73]和33.75% [24.75;51],烧伤严重指数(ABSI)为10;10.25]。44例(88%)患者在7天内完成烧伤创面的最终手术切除。39例患者(78%)在29天的治疗期内服用心得安[19;44)。45例(90%)患者补充谷氨酰胺,42例(84%)患者补充锌,31例(62%)患者补充铜。治疗开始时锌值明显偏低(6.5 mmol/l [4.7;7.9]),需要持续替换超过37.5天[22;46.75])。在纳入标准方面,所有患者接受20mg /天的奥雄龙治疗[20;20)。试验开始于第6.5天[4];14]烧伤后持续26天[19;31)。尽管肝酶值(ALT, GGT)短暂升高,但在所有测量值中,这些值分别只有2.4%和4.6%具有临床相关性(bbb10µmol/l*S)。没有一个足以引起人们的关注,值得停止治疗。结论:一套标准化的代谢治疗方案在严重烧伤患者中的应用是可靠的、可重复的和安全的。奥胺龙治疗对肝损害的潜在担忧仍然没有根据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scalp reconstruction with locoregional and free flaps - a retrospective cohort study. Results of a patient survey using an online questionnaire after implant removal for breast implant illness. Acral melanoma of the heel mimicking a pressure sore. Intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee joint with additional femoral neck screw to prevent periprosthetic fracture of the proximal femur. A case report. Subtotal diaphyseal replacement of the femur with modular mega-endoprosthesis following interprosthetic fracture. A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1